how do you "vet" something so subjective as "the best BBQ in the world"? How the eff should I know? Unlike MIR, who has apparently eaten at more BBQ places than everybody on this board combined, I don't have that kind of time.
Yeah, sometimes, I just accept other perople's opinions. Like, if Neil Armstrong tells me the moon is pretty rad? I'll accept it. If I'm told America is a better place to live than Ghana? I'll accept it. If a deep sea diver tells me that deep sea diving can be hazardous, I'll accept it. If a food writer tells me that Kansas City has better BBQ than Oklahoma City, I'll accept it.
Are you intentionally bad at analogies, goodness gracious.
I also love how in the first sentence you talk about how the topic is too subjective and then in the same breath continue to tell me why my subjective opinion is wrong.
Pissclams has tried to end this stupidity twice, just in case you missed it
and that's ok because i'm not going to tell you what you like any more than you telling me what i like.
no reason to argue something as subjective as one's taste
but KC style bbq is what the national food pundits declare the best in the country. not a particular place
Since Belvis' bus fight appears to be over for now, I'm sure he'll find some ridiculous way to keep this going though.
