0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.
Meh. They could have traded down and gotten Poe but oh well. On the bright side, we did fill our biggest need.
Quote from: PowercatPat on April 26, 2012, 08:49:27 PMMeh. They could have traded down and gotten Poe but oh well. On the bright side, we did fill our biggest need.He's going to play quarterback?Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Quote from: kitten_mittons on April 26, 2012, 08:54:14 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on April 26, 2012, 08:49:27 PMMeh. They could have traded down and gotten Poe but oh well. On the bright side, we did fill our biggest need.He's going to play quarterback?Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2QB is a need but definitely not the biggest. Are you saying you wanted to take a QB in the first round?
Quote from: PowercatPat on April 26, 2012, 09:04:16 PMQuote from: kitten_mittons on April 26, 2012, 08:54:14 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on April 26, 2012, 08:49:27 PMMeh. They could have traded down and gotten Poe but oh well. On the bright side, we did fill our biggest need.He's going to play quarterback?Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2QB is a need but definitely not the biggest. Are you saying you wanted to take a QB in the first round?I hate the chiefs, but quarterback is their biggest need. I said it last year as well, you can scroll back some pages and see it, but that's not really necessary.Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2
Quote from: kitten_mittons on April 26, 2012, 09:06:01 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on April 26, 2012, 09:04:16 PMQuote from: kitten_mittons on April 26, 2012, 08:54:14 PMQuote from: PowercatPat on April 26, 2012, 08:49:27 PMMeh. They could have traded down and gotten Poe but oh well. On the bright side, we did fill our biggest need.He's going to play quarterback?Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2QB is a need but definitely not the biggest. Are you saying you wanted to take a QB in the first round?I hate the chiefs, but quarterback is their biggest need. I said it last year as well, you can scroll back some pages and see it, but that's not really necessary.Sent from my SPH-D700 using Tapatalk 2So who would you have drafted?
Dude has a shot ton of potential. If you were able to forget the Chiefs' recent history with 1st round DLs, he would be much more exciting. He is a bit of a gamble but so is pretty much every draftee. Not a great pick but not a horrible one either.
Poe wasn't going to be around in the second round, so if the Chiefs couldn't get anything in trade that they thought was worth Poe, they made a good pick. I still think it's ridiculous that they didn't even bother to enter the Peyton Manning sweepstakes. They need a QB.
outside of the most important position, the chiefs have the best roster in the division. next year, they better give up a couple 1st rounders, move up and take one of the Tyler's (Wilson/Bray) because they won't be able to get Barkley. and they better laugh in Landry Jones face. if they go into another year with cassel/anyothercrappyjourneymanfailure... i will be finished. i will quit them.
Quote from: j-dub on April 29, 2012, 11:58:32 AMoutside of the most important position, the chiefs have the best roster in the division. next year, they better give up a couple 1st rounders, move up and take one of the Tyler's (Wilson/Bray) because they won't be able to get Barkley. and they better laugh in Landry Jones face. if they go into another year with cassel/anyothercrappyjourneymanfailure... i will be finished. i will quit them.Bro. Stop. You ain't quittin' nothin'.
Quote from: j-dub on April 29, 2012, 11:58:32 AMoutside of the most important position, the chiefs have the best roster in the division. next year, they better give up a couple 1st rounders, move up and take one of the Tyler's (Wilson/Bray) because they won't be able to get Barkley. and they better laugh in Landry Jones face. if they go into another year with cassel/anyothercrappyjourneymanfailure... i will be finished. i will quit them.Just imagine if they had the same roster, only Peyton Manning at QB. God forbid they mortgage the future, though.
Quote from: Nuts Kicked on April 29, 2012, 04:20:33 PMQuote from: j-dub on April 29, 2012, 11:58:32 AMoutside of the most important position, the chiefs have the best roster in the division. next year, they better give up a couple 1st rounders, move up and take one of the Tyler's (Wilson/Bray) because they won't be able to get Barkley. and they better laugh in Landry Jones face. if they go into another year with cassel/anyothercrappyjourneymanfailure... i will be finished. i will quit them.Just imagine if they had the same roster, only Peyton Manning at QB. God forbid they mortgage the future, though.maybe.. my issue wasn't "mortgaging the future" btw.. just wish the chiefs would join the rest of the nfl in recognizing that qb is the cornerstone, not the final piece.