Author Topic: CHIEFS  (Read 1503144 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1050 on: March 18, 2012, 12:44:43 AM »
Winston is a good pickup. Quinn really surprised me but I guess we need a backup.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1051 on: March 18, 2012, 01:19:16 AM »
Not so sure Quinn won't be the starter eventually, this season.

Offline econocat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 203
  • The father of Economics
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1052 on: March 19, 2012, 11:36:44 AM »
Do ypu Chefs fans want Tebow now that he is on market?
"Capitalism is the astounding belief that the most wickedest of men will do the most wickedest of things for the greatest good of everyone." — John Maynard Keynes

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1053 on: March 19, 2012, 12:36:29 PM »
I'm interested to hear J-Dub's predictos for the AFC west over the next 3 years, hell, the next 10 years while we're at it. 

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16045
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1054 on: March 19, 2012, 12:57:29 PM »
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1055 on: March 19, 2012, 01:07:27 PM »
I wanted Manning, but not for 5 years 90 million.  That's stupid if that's what he gets.

Why not? If he is healthy, he's worth it. I'm sure Denver put some kind of clause in his contract relating to his surgeries. What is important is the guaranteed portion of a contract.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27092
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1056 on: March 19, 2012, 04:19:17 PM »
I wanted Manning, but not for 5 years 90 million.  That's stupid if that's what he gets.

Why not? If he is healthy, he's worth it. I'm sure Denver put some kind of clause in his contract relating to his surgeries. What is important is the guaranteed portion of a contract.

Really no way of knowing his value until a game is played, and 90 million is mortgaging the future. 

Offline kitten_mittons

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 4587
  • Clawing at your furnitures.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1057 on: March 19, 2012, 04:32:13 PM »
I wanted Manning, but not for 5 years 90 million.  That's stupid if that's what he gets.

Why not? If he is healthy, he's worth it. I'm sure Denver put some kind of clause in his contract relating to his surgeries. What is important is the guaranteed portion of a contract.

Really no way of knowing his value until a game is played, and 90 million is mortgaging the future.
Didn't kc give cassel 63 million?  Also, he passed the physical for SF, Ten, and Den.  He'll be fine.

Sent from my Kindle Fire using Tapatalk

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1058 on: March 19, 2012, 04:56:32 PM »
I wanted Manning, but not for 5 years 90 million.  That's stupid if that's what he gets.

Why not? If he is healthy, he's worth it. I'm sure Denver put some kind of clause in his contract relating to his surgeries. What is important is the guaranteed portion of a contract.

Really no way of knowing his value until a game is played, and 90 million is mortgaging the future.

Do you really think that Manning is guaranteed $90 million? If he sucks, cut him. Besides, we are talking about a franchise that needed to spend about $20 million this offseason just to get to the salary cap minimum.

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29283
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1059 on: March 19, 2012, 07:01:32 PM »
#teamQuinn (or at least the "idea" of him).

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19762
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1060 on: March 19, 2012, 07:11:14 PM »
Man I hope derrick johnson breaks the rest of his neck

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1061 on: March 19, 2012, 07:52:18 PM »
Do ypu Chefs fans want Tebow now that he is on market?

no

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1062 on: March 19, 2012, 07:55:24 PM »
It'd be hard to imagine a team wanting Tebow at QB. At least, a contending team. Some team like the Jaguars may take a risk on him just to fill some seats. Allegedly, the Patriots want him, but as a FB or something.

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16045
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1063 on: March 20, 2012, 12:13:52 PM »
I would love for the chiefs to have all the Tebow media attention, do want. Will not get...but still want.
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16751
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1064 on: March 20, 2012, 01:08:42 PM »
Do ypu Chefs fans want Tebow now that he is on market?

lol he said chefs

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2542
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1065 on: April 07, 2012, 04:26:26 PM »
hearing they'll open at home against the chargers  :surprised:

Offline Saulbadguy

  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 9941
  • what
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1066 on: April 07, 2012, 04:28:41 PM »
hearing they'll open at home against the chargers  :surprised:
Monday Night? ;)
Where did you get that overnight bag?

Offline j rake

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2542
    • View Profile
    • @j_rake
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1067 on: April 08, 2012, 12:42:10 AM »
no

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1068 on: April 09, 2012, 02:55:33 PM »
Hearing more and more reports that the Chiefs interested in Ryan Tannehill at #11 if he's still there. Thoughts?
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline Winters

  • The King of Real Zeal
  • Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *********
  • Posts: 16045
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1069 on: April 09, 2012, 03:52:43 PM »
Hearing more and more reports that the Chiefs interested in Ryan Tannehill at #11 if he's still there. Thoughts?
OHHHHHHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Best #heel and/or #babyface on this blogsite



If it were up to me, Wintz would be on a fan scholarship, full ride.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1070 on: April 09, 2012, 08:43:07 PM »
Hearing more and more reports that the Chiefs interested in Ryan Tannehill at #11 if he's still there. Thoughts?

Hopefully Cleveland picks him first :pray:

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1071 on: April 09, 2012, 09:48:37 PM »
Glad to see that I'm not alone, cuz  :chainsaw: that
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline Pete

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29283
  • T-Shirt KSU Football Fan, Loves Lawrence and KU
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1072 on: April 09, 2012, 10:37:36 PM »
I really doubt that KC is interested in Tannehill.  A sketchy first round quarterback is exactly the opposite of Scott Peoli.

Offline joda

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3757
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1073 on: April 09, 2012, 11:10:44 PM »
At this point I'm actually hoping they go with the G from Stanford DeCastro(sp?). I know it probably pushes Lilja to the bench but that guy looks like he's going to be a stud. Winston/DeCastro/Hudson/Asumoh/Albert could be opening some pretty big running lanes for a long time.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: CHIEFS
« Reply #1074 on: April 09, 2012, 11:32:54 PM »
Saw Cassel in church yesterday, looked great, but very thin.