Author Topic: Tulane  (Read 9706 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Tulane
« on: September 11, 2022, 09:06:55 AM »
Are they better than Missouri?  They might be!  Tricky game this week.


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2022, 09:15:01 AM »
Break down the scout for us
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2022, 09:17:59 AM »
They absolutely destroyed UMass and Alcorn. I think we win by about 3 scores and this ends up being the tune-up for OU that Missouri failed to provide.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19427
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: Tulane
« Reply #3 on: September 11, 2022, 09:43:55 AM »
This will be the third consecutive undefeated team the cats will face this season.  Really good chance we face four in a row too!

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9380
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #4 on: September 11, 2022, 11:04:28 AM »
All I know is they aren't going to be a push over so we need to ball out a bit.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline Church Creeper

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 230
  • Help me get rid of it by sniffing it up
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2022, 10:23:47 AM »
Will by far be the toughest test yet this year

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19300
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2022, 10:46:47 AM »
they're not in the Sunbelt, are they :ohno:
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #7 on: September 12, 2022, 10:57:45 AM »
 :lol: luckily not, but the last time we played a team from The American, we lost :ohno:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #8 on: September 12, 2022, 11:07:07 AM »
Need the Chingon 3000 power rankings to get a good read on how we stack up. I would guess our offensive efficiency is in the shitter.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #9 on: September 12, 2022, 12:42:04 PM »
Let’s be honest. Outside of the concern with the passing game, we’ve barely broken a sweat so far this year.

So it will be interesting how this plays out this Saturday.

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #10 on: September 12, 2022, 12:49:27 PM »
Excited for Tulane’s uniforms.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16751
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #11 on: September 12, 2022, 01:05:30 PM »
i will be terrified about every game moving forward until we lose

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #12 on: September 12, 2022, 05:04:50 PM »
I would guess our offensive efficiency is in the shitter.
Not horrific using _fan's numbers. We are running the holy crap out of the ball, but of course passing has a long way to go.

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #13 on: September 12, 2022, 07:52:01 PM »
I would guess our offensive efficiency is in the shitter.
Not horrific using _fan's numbers. We are running the holy crap out of the ball, but of course passing has a long way to go.

And receiving.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Online nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #14 on: September 12, 2022, 07:54:05 PM »
We also block exceptionally well at all positions.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12817
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #15 on: September 13, 2022, 11:13:56 AM »
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #16 on: September 13, 2022, 07:51:49 PM »
Jesus Christ, katdaddy, enough with this. I know you've watched football before, you've watched enough to know how this works, and that ain't it.

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12817
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #17 on: September 13, 2022, 08:14:07 PM »
What the eff do you think we need to do, since we don't have a QB with any experience to replace AM who is been hurt more than ST.  Don't bring up our other back QB as an option since it came from your lips that he doesn't have any talent.
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #18 on: September 13, 2022, 08:16:28 PM »
What in the world??!!

Offline BW

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 331
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #19 on: September 13, 2022, 08:36:37 PM »
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
I had to listen to K-State Karl spew this for the whole second half from a row behind me on Saturday. Infuriating.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #20 on: September 14, 2022, 10:15:25 AM »
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
I had to listen to K-State Karl spew this for the whole second half from a row behind me on Saturday. Infuriating.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Has there ever been a football coach making roster decisions, a game and a half into the season, for next season? Are we the first fan base in college football history actually asking for a two quarterback system?

A back up quarterback 4-4 for 42 yds and 0 tds in garbage time against FCS backups and some people absolutely lose their minds.

We don't even know if Rubley is the backup. Klieman made it clear that he's trying to preserve Howard's red shirt.

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #21 on: September 14, 2022, 12:59:33 PM »
AM was similar to ST stat-wise but on a much shittier team. He’s going to be fine passing the ball

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64049
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #22 on: September 14, 2022, 01:03:25 PM »
Yeah, against big 10 defenses. The big 12 might tear him to shreds  :ohno:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #23 on: September 14, 2022, 02:01:08 PM »
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
I had to listen to K-State Karl spew this for the whole second half from a row behind me on Saturday. Infuriating.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Has there ever been a football coach making roster decisions, a game and a half into the season, for next season? Are we the first fan base in college football history actually asking for a two quarterback system?

A back up quarterback 4-4 for 42 yds and 0 tds in garbage time against FCS backups and some people absolutely lose their minds.

We don't even know if Rubley is the backup. Klieman made it clear that he's trying to preserve Howard's red shirt.

I’m not sure it’s really fair to ask if we are first fan base when the only human I’ve seen type or talk about it is katdaddy from goEMAW.com

Offline stunted

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5571
    • View Profile
Re: Tulane
« Reply #24 on: September 14, 2022, 03:17:40 PM »
Yeah, against big 10 defenses. The big 12 might tear him to shreds  :ohno:

Big 10 is a nice tune-up conference before playing in the big 12