goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: CHONGS on September 11, 2022, 09:06:55 AM

Title: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 11, 2022, 09:06:55 AM
Are they better than Missouri?  They might be!  Tricky game this week.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 11, 2022, 09:15:01 AM
Break down the scout for us
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 11, 2022, 09:17:59 AM
They absolutely destroyed UMass and Alcorn. I think we win by about 3 scores and this ends up being the tune-up for OU that Missouri failed to provide.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 11, 2022, 09:43:55 AM
This will be the third consecutive undefeated team the cats will face this season.  Really good chance we face four in a row too!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 11, 2022, 11:04:28 AM
All I know is they aren't going to be a push over so we need to ball out a bit.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Church Creeper on September 12, 2022, 10:23:47 AM
Will by far be the toughest test yet this year
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: WillieWatanabe on September 12, 2022, 10:46:47 AM
they're not in the Sunbelt, are they :ohno:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 12, 2022, 10:57:45 AM
 :lol: luckily not, but the last time we played a team from The American, we lost :ohno:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 12, 2022, 11:07:07 AM
Need the Chingon 3000 power rankings to get a good read on how we stack up. I would guess our offensive efficiency is in the shitter.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 12, 2022, 12:42:04 PM
Let’s be honest. Outside of the concern with the passing game, we’ve barely broken a sweat so far this year.

So it will be interesting how this plays out this Saturday.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 12, 2022, 12:49:27 PM
Excited for Tulane’s uniforms.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: 'taterblast on September 12, 2022, 01:05:30 PM
i will be terrified about every game moving forward until we lose
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 12, 2022, 05:04:50 PM
I would guess our offensive efficiency is in the shitter.
Not horrific using _fan's numbers. We are running the holy crap out of the ball, but of course passing has a long way to go.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 12, 2022, 07:52:01 PM
I would guess our offensive efficiency is in the shitter.
Not horrific using _fan's numbers. We are running the holy crap out of the ball, but of course passing has a long way to go.

And receiving.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 12, 2022, 07:54:05 PM
We also block exceptionally well at all positions.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Katpappy on September 13, 2022, 11:13:56 AM
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 13, 2022, 07:51:49 PM
Jesus Christ, katdaddy, enough with this. I know you've watched football before, you've watched enough to know how this works, and that ain't it.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Katpappy on September 13, 2022, 08:14:07 PM
What the eff do you think we need to do, since we don't have a QB with any experience to replace AM who is been hurt more than ST.  Don't bring up our other back QB as an option since it came from your lips that he doesn't have any talent.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 13, 2022, 08:16:28 PM
What in the world??!!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BW on September 13, 2022, 08:36:37 PM
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
I had to listen to K-State Karl spew this for the whole second half from a row behind me on Saturday. Infuriating.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 14, 2022, 10:15:25 AM
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
I had to listen to K-State Karl spew this for the whole second half from a row behind me on Saturday. Infuriating.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Has there ever been a football coach making roster decisions, a game and a half into the season, for next season? Are we the first fan base in college football history actually asking for a two quarterback system?

A back up quarterback 4-4 for 42 yds and 0 tds in garbage time against FCS backups and some people absolutely lose their minds.

We don't even know if Rubley is the backup. Klieman made it clear that he's trying to preserve Howard's red shirt.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on September 14, 2022, 12:59:33 PM
AM was similar to ST stat-wise but on a much shittier team. He’s going to be fine passing the ball
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: star seed 7 on September 14, 2022, 01:03:25 PM
Yeah, against big 10 defenses. The big 12 might tear him to shreds  :ohno:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 14, 2022, 02:01:08 PM
CK needs the team to build a large lead in the first half and then bench AM.  Put Rubley in the rest of the game, as we need to get this kid ready to play next year.  Also, AM might not stay healthy for the season and we don't want to be left short at QB.
I had to listen to K-State Karl spew this for the whole second half from a row behind me on Saturday. Infuriating.

Sent from my SM-G975U using Tapatalk

Has there ever been a football coach making roster decisions, a game and a half into the season, for next season? Are we the first fan base in college football history actually asking for a two quarterback system?

A back up quarterback 4-4 for 42 yds and 0 tds in garbage time against FCS backups and some people absolutely lose their minds.

We don't even know if Rubley is the backup. Klieman made it clear that he's trying to preserve Howard's red shirt.

I’m not sure it’s really fair to ask if we are first fan base when the only human I’ve seen type or talk about it is katdaddy from goEMAW.com
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on September 14, 2022, 03:17:40 PM
Yeah, against big 10 defenses. The big 12 might tear him to shreds  :ohno:

Big 10 is a nice tune-up conference before playing in the big 12
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 02:10:55 PM
Why are we playing North Carolina, I thought today's game was against the Green Wave?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 02:28:21 PM
Wind apparently a factor today
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on September 17, 2022, 02:31:49 PM
we suck!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 02:33:25 PM
we suck!
Yeah. :frown:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on September 17, 2022, 02:34:22 PM
we look sexy but at what cost
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 02:35:20 PM
we look sexy but at what cost

Losing never looks sexy.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 02:37:26 PM
Boring game, hard to get hyped
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 02:38:14 PM
Sounds like we're just not caring, idk, tired of us offensively being meh
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 02:39:52 PM
Sounds like we're just not caring, idk, tired of us offensively being meh
Meh deuce will probably break one and we'll win
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 02:41:31 PM
Sounds like we're just not caring, idk, tired of us offensively being meh
Meh deuce will probably break one and we'll win

I'm sure we probably will but it's goddamn annoying, same with the penalties
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 02:41:53 PM
Sounds like we're just not caring, idk, tired of us offensively being meh

Yeah, our offense has not really impressed me up to this point in the season. We only have 40 yards and 2 first downs. That's going to get us run out of the stadium against Oklahoma.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 02:44:38 PM
Really impressive 1st quarter by us, we really came out swinging
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2022, 02:47:30 PM
Well the good news is we probably don’t have to worry about Klein getting poached after this year
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 02:47:50 PM
Welp, that first quarter wasn't much fun
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2022, 02:48:57 PM
Gross
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2022, 02:49:21 PM
Put in rubely
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 02:54:56 PM
The deuce code has been cracked, apparently
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 02:56:02 PM
I'm worried if we don't win this we will never have alternate uniforms again  :ohno:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 03:04:48 PM
Duece has not been good in short yardage situations straight up the middle. Not sure why we keep trying that with him due to his size.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 03:05:21 PM
What the eff?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Church Creeper on September 17, 2022, 03:05:33 PM
4th and half a yard we do that stupid shotgun crap with Duece behind him...same old crap CK
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 03:06:46 PM
Before the narrative gets started, there are open receivers down field, Adrian is afraid to throw the ball and his short throws are off target.

Horse crap play call on 4th and less than a yard.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 03:06:48 PM
I'm worried if we don't win this we will never have alternate uniforms again  :ohno:

Yup, well never do it again even if we do
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 03:07:34 PM
And how do you not just qb sneak it, for fucks sake
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 03:09:10 PM
Before the narrative gets started, there are open receivers down field, Adrian is afraid to throw the ball and his short throws are off target.

Horse crap play call on 4th and less than a yard.

Ding, ding, ding...

This offense will be stagnant as long as Martinez cant/won't make a throw longer than 5 yards.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 03:16:53 PM
Is Martinez not recovered from his surgery?

Also these refs suck in our favor lol
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 03:20:19 PM
That was a very tight fit, maybe now he'll let it go
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 03:20:58 PM
Kade has made two amazing catches. That one handed grab on the sideline was crazy
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 03:21:15 PM
Thank God.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 03:21:42 PM
4th and half a yard we do that stupid shotgun crap with Duece behind him...same old crap CK

CK's tribute to Messingham
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Katpappy on September 17, 2022, 03:22:59 PM
I believe I mentioned that AM wasn't very good, but of course, the FB master thought he is doing good.  Welp like someone just posted, "horseshit".  :flush:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 03:23:20 PM
WTF did the Tulane QB put on his neck
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 03:26:42 PM
Defense bailing us out again!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 03:30:40 PM
Finally
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 03:33:11 PM
Well.... at least we have the lead.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 17, 2022, 03:34:01 PM
So was knowles wide open on that last play?  Or was that just the camera angle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 03:35:03 PM
So was knowles wide open on that last play?  Or was that just the camera angle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had to rewind it too. He looked wide open to me.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 17, 2022, 03:36:41 PM
So was knowles wide open on that last play?  Or was that just the camera angle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I had to rewind it too. He looked wide open to me.
I thought he paused, looked at him, and thought “too open”


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 03:37:42 PM
I didn't see Knowles open but I guess everyone else in my section did, people were pissed.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 03:40:20 PM
Important to come out after half and score, and put the game away.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on September 17, 2022, 03:43:25 PM
am passed for a billion yards at nebraska. he'll figure it out. a few more big plays like the one to kade and hopefully that gets his confidence back.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on September 17, 2022, 03:44:53 PM
Important to come out after half and score, and put the game away.

i want to see 3 tuddies. that would turn the game from terrible to just slightly disappointing.
Title: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 03:49:51 PM
Yeah. Don’t throw that pass.

https://twitter.com/pufizzle/status/1571236816589672450?s=46&t=Gcn-sY5mLFuHJh_cPHiDhw
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2022, 03:50:55 PM
Agree, that's down at the 1
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 03:55:19 PM
yeah, announcer pointed out 37 was baiting AM to throw it to Knowles and he didn't fall for it. . .
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 03:59:01 PM
Yeah, seems like the wise decision.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Church Creeper on September 17, 2022, 04:00:34 PM
This offense is just atrocious
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 04:03:17 PM
I'm fully on the Rubley train at this point. 9AM wasn't even aggressive on a 4th down run.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: zackole1 on September 17, 2022, 04:05:02 PM
Both defensive and offensive lines getting whipped....
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 04:05:51 PM
It feels like we're going to lose this.  Everything seems very hard on both offense and defense. 
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: ksuchris2000 on September 17, 2022, 04:06:06 PM
AM looks really tentative at everything he does.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 17, 2022, 04:10:04 PM
Guys I'm not sure if you have noticed or not but we really suck ass. This is not good football.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:10:09 PM
It's just so boring
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: zackole1 on September 17, 2022, 04:10:17 PM
Martinez does not impress...
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 04:10:54 PM
This entire offensive package just sucks balls.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: goCats101 on September 17, 2022, 04:11:40 PM
This has felt very Fresno State 2004-y, despite being tied at the moment
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 04:12:06 PM
Blame whatever, but the Martinez at Nebraska has yet to appear for Kstate.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 04:12:25 PM
We really suck at 3rd quarters
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 04:12:40 PM
ffs
Title: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 04:16:02 PM
This offensive team has the zeal of a molding apple right now


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:16:03 PM
Defense has honestly been fine
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CNS on September 17, 2022, 04:20:15 PM
We have a good line, a good running back, and an athletic QB. I feel like we should be doing some option or something.

We also have Mr. Running Concussion as an OC. Seems like we should look into that.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 04:20:40 PM
So much woof
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 04:20:48 PM
I don't think we have a good line if I'm honest.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 04:20:59 PM
I'm legitimately worried about whether we're going to win or not.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 17, 2022, 04:21:04 PM
Jesus Christ this is so bad
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 04:21:16 PM
We have a good line, a good running back, and an athletic QB. I feel like we should be doing some option or something.

We also have Mr. Running Concussion as an OC. Seems like we should look into that.

Yeah, our play calling is as if we're playing in molasses, just slow and ineffective
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:21:28 PM
Booooooo
Title: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 04:22:03 PM
This offense looks like IDGAF

Vaughn in the dressing room.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 04:22:51 PM
That's really great but Katori's issue has always been the abundance of false start and holding penalties he's racked up.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 17, 2022, 04:25:47 PM
Defense has honestly been fine

Yeah, the defense is having a good game.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2022, 04:29:24 PM
Over the first couple games I just thought 9AM was cautious. Now I’m convinced he’s just not accurate (which explains why he’s so cautious).
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 04:29:29 PM
So tired of 1 yard runs, rough ridin' do something different
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:30:01 PM
Have we had players wear chains before? Giddens may be a trailblazer
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:30:56 PM
Over the first couple games I just thought 9AM was cautious. Now I’m convinced he’s just not accurate (which explains why he’s so cautious).
Good to be cautious if you're inaccurate!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 04:31:10 PM
Picking up the the flag and AM’s passing pretty much blows.  He’s sailing everything. 
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Pete on September 17, 2022, 04:31:24 PM
1-10 third downs?!?!?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 04:32:07 PM
Is Martinez not recovered from his surgery?


Has to be something to this, right?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 17, 2022, 04:32:30 PM
Has Martinez completed a in stride pass that the receiver didn't have to make a huge adjustment to? I mean Jesus Christ he is inaccurate.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:33:54 PM
Sheesh
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 04:34:09 PM
1-10 third downs?!?!?

1-4 on fourth downs.  :facepalm:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 04:34:38 PM
https://twitter.com/jake_rubley/status/1212487977156239361?t=xqqlHBD7S66vu5I85E_L-A&s=19
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2022, 04:35:22 PM
Has Martinez completed a in stride pass that the receiver didn't have to make a huge adjustment to? I mean Jesus Christ he is inaccurate.

It’s pretty clear his shoulder surgery rendered his arm ineffective.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 04:35:23 PM
This blows. Terrible play calling, no pop, AM couldn’t hit the Grand Canyon standing on the rim. 
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 04:35:34 PM
Wow... if we can't start completing passes, we're going to lose. It's just that simple. They're selling out for the run.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2022, 04:35:48 PM
I mean Rubley can do anything Martinez has done so far. They’re going to sell out to stop the run until we show we can throw it within 5 yards of a receiver.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:36:07 PM
I like giddens but we need Deuce if we're gonna win. Against Tulane.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 17, 2022, 04:36:38 PM
Has Martinez completed a in stride pass that the receiver didn't have to make a huge adjustment to? I mean Jesus Christ he is inaccurate.

Just the touchdown to Warner.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:37:51 PM
He's hit some players standing still
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2022, 04:37:52 PM
Has Martinez completed a in stride pass that the receiver didn't have to make a huge adjustment to? I mean Jesus Christ he is inaccurate.

Just the touchdown to Warner.
In hindsight that pass seems like a “broken clock right twice a day” situation.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 04:37:54 PM
This game is atrocious
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sys on September 17, 2022, 04:38:17 PM
i expected us to be winning by more.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 04:38:27 PM
the shotgun formation on 4th and short and failing miserably every time is just poetry in motion
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 04:38:32 PM
I mean Rubley can do anything Martinez has done so far. They’re going to sell out to stop the run until we show we can throw it within 5 yards of a receiver.

Welcome to the Rubley band wagon. It will be a short journey until we can get to the AJ wagon but enjoy the ride.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Purple Derpathy on September 17, 2022, 04:41:03 PM
I like giddens but we need Deuce if we're gonna win. Against Tulane.

No, we just need AM to play like an average QB.
Title: Tulane
Post by: Pete on September 17, 2022, 04:41:38 PM
Is there a chance our coaches are blindfolded? Perhaps some sort of coaches versus cancer wear a blindfold day or something?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 17, 2022, 04:42:25 PM
Turn to page 2 of the playbook now CK and go rough ridin' score, this is so stupid right now we are tied with these clowns.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:42:30 PM
I like giddens but we need Deuce if we're gonna win. Against Tulane.

No, we just need AM to play like an average QB.
Perhaps
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Purple Derpathy on September 17, 2022, 04:44:35 PM
Is there a chance our coaches are blindfolded? Perhaps some sort of coaches versus cancer wear a blindfold day or something?

This is not a coaching problem, unless you believe are coaches are blind to the fact AM sucks.  Problem is, Howard sucks and Rubes is unproven. 

Half our drives have been stalled out by AM's inability to complete a pass, break a tackle, etc.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 04:44:41 PM
Turn to page 2 of the playbook now CK and go rough ridin' score, this is so stupid right now we are tied with these clowns.

That is where the passing plays are, not sure that is gonna help
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 04:44:54 PM
Our o line is getting mushed. 
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 04:46:36 PM
This defense is so good and deserves an offense to help them out
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 17, 2022, 04:46:48 PM
This is so pathetic
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: zackole1 on September 17, 2022, 04:47:13 PM
should probably run a rough ridin' pattern past the first down line...
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sys on September 17, 2022, 04:48:05 PM
one problem i've noticed is that we like to get a little bit less than is necessary for a first down.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on September 17, 2022, 04:48:29 PM
:frown:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2022, 04:48:44 PM
Rubley should have went in by now. If we don’t trust Martinez to make a pass on the first two downs he shouldn’t be out there.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:49:09 PM
one problem i've noticed is that we like to get a little bit less than is necessary for a first down.

It's our version of Nebraska's one score losses. So close!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Purple Derpathy on September 17, 2022, 04:49:38 PM
This is awful. Is AM blind to where the first down marker is? Like, if we need 8 yards, you need to throw the ball to a receiver 8 yards downfield unless he is short of the marker but wide rough ridin' open.  He's so scared of throwing a pick he's willing to hit the relief valve every time regardless of down and distance.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 04:49:46 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Purple Derpathy on September 17, 2022, 04:50:54 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.

The playcalling is fine.  The execution at QB is a damn nightmare.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 04:51:57 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.

The playcalling is fine.  The execution at QB is a damn nightmare.

On balance AM is worde than the playcalling, but the latter hasn't been great this game either
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 04:52:19 PM
Unless the defense/return team scores we will lose this game.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2022, 04:54:43 PM
Unless the defense/return team scores we will lose this game.

We are effectively playing for overtime, as sad as that is.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 04:55:13 PM
We're averaging 4.6 ypp on offense - in this Era of college football, that's terrible. AM is responsible for some of this, but Klein needs to figure out how to be better if this is the version of AM that we're going to get.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 17, 2022, 04:55:24 PM
Unless the defense/return team scores we will lose this game.

We are effectively playing for overtime, as sad as that is.

It's pretty rough ridin' stupid.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 17, 2022, 04:56:30 PM
We need to go with Rubley. He might not be better, but he can't be worse.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2022, 04:56:50 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.

The playcalling is fine.  The execution at QB is a damn nightmare.

On balance AM is worde than the playcalling, but the latter hasn't been great this game either
When you can’t call like 90% of your pass plays there’s only so much a play caller can do.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 04:59:41 PM
Klein is having an all time pants shitting
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 04:59:52 PM
Jesus Christ
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on September 17, 2022, 05:00:04 PM
That HAS GOT to be Martinez’s last play.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 05:00:21 PM
eff this, like eff this, how can you do that
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 05:01:14 PM
What the actually eff is Klein doing
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sys on September 17, 2022, 05:01:23 PM
why not just get more yards?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on September 17, 2022, 05:01:33 PM
Putrid
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 05:01:45 PM
This team is amazing at like just not getting a first down
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:01:48 PM
What a disappointing game and potentially season.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 05:01:57 PM
Guys we're going to lose this one
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 05:02:01 PM
How can we eff up an option that bad, who the hell are we?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 05:02:26 PM
Guys we're going to lose this one

Yup
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: zackole1 on September 17, 2022, 05:02:34 PM
don't tell me the defense is playing fine....
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 05:03:16 PM
don't tell me the defense is playing fine....

Oh eff off, they're having to live out there cause this offense is crap
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2022, 05:03:33 PM
Will be interesting to see how composed Klieman can be post game after losing to Tulane on the back of his new OC completely shitting the bed.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 05:03:39 PM
That's likely ballgame. We haven't sniffed the redzone all half.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:04:05 PM
don't tell me the defense is playing fine....

[redacted], you blind?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 05:04:28 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.

The playcalling is fine.  The execution at QB is a damn nightmare.

On balance AM is worde than the playcalling, but the latter hasn't been great this game either
When you can’t call like 90% of your pass plays there’s only so much a play caller can do.

The coaches know what they have to work with and if they can't adapt that's on them. Our ofense looked better with Will Howard and Messingham calling plays last year. That's pathetic.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 05:05:07 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.

The playcalling is fine.  The execution at QB is a damn nightmare.

On balance AM is worde than the playcalling, but the latter hasn't been great this game either
When you can’t call like 90% of your pass plays there’s only so much a play caller can do.

The coaches know what they have to work with and if they can't adapt that's on them. Our ofense looked better with Will Howard and Messingham calling plays last year. That's pathetic.
Let's not get carried away but it's not much better
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:05:24 PM
Klieman hasn't done enough yet to get away with losing this game. 
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 05:06:16 PM
Even if we somehow pull this off, all confidence in this season popped, what a joke
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:06:27 PM
Will be interesting to see how composed Klieman can be post game after losing to Tulane on the back of his new OC completely shitting the bed.

He ruined his friendship for this, big yikes
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 05:06:28 PM
Klieman hasn't done enough yet to get away with losing this game.
You would fire him?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:06:28 PM
West Virginia might be the only team we can beat at this point. And I'm not sure we could.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Purple Derpathy on September 17, 2022, 05:07:30 PM
Is Messinham holding Klein at gunpoint in the press box? AM is not playing well, but that doesn't mean we have to be this predictable.

The playcalling is fine.  The execution at QB is a damn nightmare.

On balance AM is worde than the playcalling, but the latter hasn't been great this game either
When you can’t call like 90% of your pass plays there’s only so much a play caller can do.

The coaches know what they have to work with and if they can't adapt that's on them. Our ofense looked better with Will Howard and Messingham calling plays last year. That's pathetic.

Howard could have run a better option on that 4th down play (along with a few other running plays), but there is no way he is better than AM throwing the football. They both are terrible, but Howard's decision-making and accuracy is that of a JV QB.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:07:39 PM
Klieman hasn't done enough yet to get away with losing this game.
You would fire him?
Probably not. But this can't be swept away.  It's a permanent mark against him.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 05:07:58 PM
I think we've failed to get a first on 10+ 3rd/4th and 1's   :facepalm:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:08:26 PM
Is Martinez's shitty arm causing Klein to repeatedly run shotgun from 4th and 1? LHC Bill Snyder is rolling over in his grave.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: ksuchris2000 on September 17, 2022, 05:09:20 PM
Why are we in shotgun on 4th and 1
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:09:37 PM
I mean if we win only 2 conference games or less i'd be fine firing him
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:09:42 PM
Was that on Martinez too?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 05:10:23 PM
Un-rough ridin'-real
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Purple Derpathy on September 17, 2022, 05:10:52 PM
WTF was that
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:11:00 PM
The offensive line is getting destroyed.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: cfbandyman on September 17, 2022, 05:11:35 PM
Why are we trying to do short ass passes on rough ridin' 3rd down
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:11:54 PM
I mean if we win only 2 conference games or less i'd be fine firing him

My guess is you wouldn't have had this take if Tulane finished off OU last year.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 17, 2022, 05:13:14 PM
Why are we trying to do short ass passes on rough ridin' 3rd down

There are downfield routes, but Martinez isn't willing to throw them.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:13:36 PM


I mean if we win only 2 conference games or less i'd be fine firing him

My guess is you wouldn't have had this take if Tulane finished off OU last year.

Well they didn't. And we look like a team ready to lose 7+  conference games.

Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 05:15:03 PM


I mean if we win only 2 conference games or less i'd be fine firing him

My guess is you wouldn't have had this take if Tulane finished off OU last year.

Well they didn't. And we look like a team ready to lose 7+  conference games.
We won't lose 7 conference games lol
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Pete on September 17, 2022, 05:15:25 PM
Is Houston worse than Tulane?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:15:34 PM
Klieman hasn't done enough yet to get away with losing this game.

This game and decision making in key short line to gain situations is very similar to the UT game. I wonder what Klieman's role is in play calling.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Kid In the Hall on September 17, 2022, 05:16:22 PM
Our offensive output today is worse than every game with the Howard/Mess combo except for the ISU shutout in 2020.

Let that sink in...
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 05:16:41 PM
Our offensive output today is worse than every game with the Howard/Mess combo except for the ISU shutout in 2020.

Let that sink in...


I mean if we win only 2 conference games or less i'd be fine firing him

My guess is you wouldn't have had this take if Tulane finished off OU last year.

Well they didn't. And we look like a team ready to lose 7+  conference games.

Exactly. We've looked more inept today than KU did all last season.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2022, 05:17:04 PM
Chiefs school anyway
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:17:15 PM
Is Houston worse than Tulane?

They're probably similar
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Hurricane Cat on September 17, 2022, 05:17:28 PM
Well crap
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Pete on September 17, 2022, 05:17:55 PM
Is Houston worse than Tulane?

They're probably similar
Ooofff
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Pete on September 17, 2022, 05:18:28 PM
Good news is that we play KU (our super bowl) last
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 05:18:41 PM
This fever dream is not fun
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 17, 2022, 05:18:55 PM
eff this hee haw mofo thinking he can Fargo his way through FBS football.

Another crap show home loss for The Mole. 


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 17, 2022, 05:19:02 PM
studs/duds joke on twitter is gonna fall a little flat tomorrow
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:19:49 PM
No sugar coating this.  This is a terrible loss and a terrible performance.  This season is probably DOA.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:21:46 PM
I feel bad for Deuce.  His post season accolades are gone now. 
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sys on September 17, 2022, 05:22:25 PM
we probably have to fire klysmann, i think.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 17, 2022, 05:23:02 PM
I feel bad for Deuce.  His post season accolades are gone now. 

I’d opt out of the season honestly if I were him.  Focus on getting drafted.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 05:23:06 PM
No sugar coating this.  This is a terrible loss and a terrible performance.  This season is probably DOA.

At least the Mets are still dinkin and doinkin around. For now, anyway
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: PurpleOil on September 17, 2022, 05:23:11 PM
I can't believe we were picked to be a dark horse to win the conference. We're going to be lucky to make a bowl game.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: ksuchris2000 on September 17, 2022, 05:25:36 PM
That loss belongs to OC Klein. Defense did all it could with NO help.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 05:25:44 PM
I still want to know what was on that qb's neck
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2022, 05:27:34 PM
I still want to know what was on that qb's neck

I've noticed a few nfl players wearing it too.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 05:33:24 PM
https://twitter.com/Pete_goEMAW_com/status/1571265506463588352?t=Wr_0ffqBx_qPLX72n3qRmQ&s=19

Nice!
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 05:40:57 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 05:44:14 PM
A big factor is how uncompetitive we looked on offense.  They gave us +2 in turnovers.  They just destroyed our offensive line.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 05:52:16 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 17, 2022, 05:52:31 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?

Arkansas State was significantly worse than both of those and today.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Houstoncat93 on September 17, 2022, 05:59:22 PM
https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/1571270991938043904?t=TVpt-nIBHbe7WUKrtfL2EA&s=19

Well, at least he sees the same problem we do. Now go fix it
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 06:01:01 PM
https://twitter.com/KellisRobinett/status/1571270991938043904?t=TVpt-nIBHbe7WUKrtfL2EA&s=19

Well, at least he sees the same problem we do. Now go fix it
I'm pretty sure the coaches have drilled him to not make mistakes above everything. They've probably taken it too far.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CHONGS on September 17, 2022, 06:01:35 PM
Maybe during the game was the time to deliver that message.  I hear they take a break about halfway though these days.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: KITNfury on September 17, 2022, 06:06:38 PM
We suck crap and that makes me sad.
Title: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 17, 2022, 06:14:17 PM
https://twitter.com/DerekYoungKSO/status/1571271777753391106?s=20&t=hgtBldcdoy9Bq0_LGgz1wQ

Odd timing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on September 17, 2022, 06:22:30 PM
https://twitter.com/DerekYoungKSO/status/1571271777753391106?s=20&t=hgtBldcdoy9Bq0_LGgz1wQ

Odd timing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 17, 2022, 06:30:47 PM
We’ve got a QB who won’t lay it on the line for the extra foot. Goddammit, this is a crap loss.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 17, 2022, 06:33:47 PM
https://twitter.com/DerekYoungKSO/status/1571271777753391106?s=20&t=hgtBldcdoy9Bq0_LGgz1wQ

Odd timing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who?
Transfer from Missouri who moved to LB (from safety).  He appeared top of the depth chart, but sounded like injuries were an issue so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: CNS on September 17, 2022, 06:37:01 PM
Martinez is an old guy and has nothing behind him. If he is playing nervous, he’s stupid.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 17, 2022, 06:38:17 PM
What a sack of crap. Ruined my Jamaican vacation. Goddammit, such trash. Feel bad for the Defense.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: KSUfaithful on September 17, 2022, 06:39:09 PM
https://twitter.com/DerekYoungKSO/status/1571271777753391106?s=20&t=hgtBldcdoy9Bq0_LGgz1wQ

Odd timing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who?
Transfer from Missouri who moved to LB (from safety).  He appeared top of the depth chart, but sounded like injuries were an issue so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’d leave too if Austin Moore was playing in front of me. Nothing against Austin but Shawn has x1000 more talent and skill.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Winters on September 17, 2022, 06:41:09 PM
I will get violently ill if I ever see a shovel pass from this offense again
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 17, 2022, 06:42:37 PM
Martinez had about 5 fptc plays. Sack up and get the first down. Get it together Klein.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 17, 2022, 06:46:31 PM
Ell Roberson wouldn’t have gone down like that. rough ridin' Skylar Thompson wouldn’t have either.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BIG APPLE CAT on September 17, 2022, 07:16:15 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Winters on September 17, 2022, 07:18:20 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on September 17, 2022, 07:21:33 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse

Way worse. This is Klieman year four, and we’re looking like complete crap in a home non con loss. Maybe Klein should eat a rough ridin' cheeseburger and teach his QB how to sack up and get crap done.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 17, 2022, 07:34:24 PM
I don’t think so. Tulane might end up being pretty solid and maybe even good. Marshall was the worst one imo. I know Ell was hurt but man, that 2003 team was so goddamn good.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: BoondockSooner on September 17, 2022, 08:01:54 PM
Tulane is an incredible football team. Do not panic.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Winters on September 17, 2022, 08:07:41 PM
Tulane is an incredible football team. Do not panic.
Lol
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Brock Landers on September 17, 2022, 08:08:19 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse

Way worse. This is Klieman year for, and we’re looking like complete crap in a home non con loss. Maybe Klein should eat a rough ridin' cheeseburger and teach his QB how to sack up and get crap done.

IIRC Arky State had some stud receiver who went on to the NFL.  Tulane is solid but doesn't have anyone line that, this was a crap performance by our offense so therefore far worse than Arkansas State.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2022, 08:09:39 PM
What a sack of crap. Ruined my Jamaican vacation. Goddammit, such trash. Feel bad for the Defense.

(https://y.yarn.co/d7413671-798b-4b47-9bf7-beaffa5fbe13_text.gif)
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Trim on September 17, 2022, 08:55:58 PM
Espn+ stopped working at the watch party when it was still 0-0. Probably a blessing on a few fronts. Call for hyperlocal anecdotes.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: star seed 7 on September 17, 2022, 09:01:45 PM
It's such a piece of crap
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 17, 2022, 09:17:00 PM
I still can’t get over AM getting the yips on pitching on that option.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: ben ji on September 17, 2022, 09:19:21 PM
Espn+ stopped working at the watch party when it was still 0-0. Probably a blessing on a few fronts. Call for hyperlocal anecdotes.

Yeah, my ESPN+ worked fine on the ESPN app on my TV for the first half, switched over to watch our sunflower brothers at half and when I came back it made me start from the 1st quarter and wouldnt let me fast forward. I could still watch it on my phone with no issues and eventually figured out that if I fired up my xbox and watched it on the ESPN app on there it was not an issue.

How does that even happen?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: ben ji on September 17, 2022, 09:20:54 PM
I still can’t get over AM getting the yips on pitching on that option.

CK7 needs to put AM9 through some Oklahoma Drills in the parking lot until he is no longer afraid of making contact.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 17, 2022, 09:28:12 PM
Espn+ stopped working at the watch party when it was still 0-0. Probably a blessing on a few fronts. Call for hyperlocal anecdotes.

Yeah, my ESPN+ worked fine on the ESPN app on my TV for the first half, switched over to watch our sunflower brothers at half and when I came back it made me start from the 1st quarter and wouldnt let me fast forward. I could still watch it on my phone with no issues and eventually figured out that if I fired up my xbox and watched it on the ESPN app on there it was not an issue.

How does that even happen?
Can confirm, happened on my tv as well.  I just gave up.  Sounds like it was for the better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Cire on September 17, 2022, 10:00:01 PM
Really bad miscalculation by the staff. 3 years from now we will find out that Klein didn’t like rubley because jakes not religious


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2022, 12:38:43 AM
https://twitter.com/DerekYoungKSO/status/1571271777753391106?s=20&t=hgtBldcdoy9Bq0_LGgz1wQ

Odd timing

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Who?
Transfer from Missouri who moved to LB (from safety).  He appeared top of the depth chart, but sounded like injuries were an issue so far.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I’d leave too if Austin Moore was playing in front of me. Nothing against Austin but Shawn has x1000 more talent and skill.

Three schools in three seasons says otherwise
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2022, 12:41:37 AM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse

Non elite college football programs lose games like this all the damn time, the margins are too thin and college football players and coaches aren't that good.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2022, 12:48:30 AM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse

Way worse. This is Klieman year for, and we’re looking like complete crap in a home non con loss. Maybe Klein should eat a rough ridin' cheeseburger and teach his QB how to sack up and get crap done.

IIRC Arky State had some stud receiver who went on to the NFL.  Tulane is solid but doesn't have anyone line that, this was a crap performance by our offense so therefore far worse than Arkansas State.

Jonathan Adams was never drafted. Later that season he got charged after he was smoking weed in his car that was parked in a handicapped spot. Cop came up to the car and he also admitted he had an unlicenced gun in the car. The Lions signed him as to a free agent contract, he got cut, then like a week later he got a 6 game PED suspension from the NFL and never played a second of NFL football.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 18, 2022, 07:38:22 AM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse

Non elite college football programs lose games like this all the damn time, the margins are too thin and college football players and coaches aren't that good.

I get that. This one is different to me because the coaches are playing a QB that can’t/won’t do half of what a QB is supposed to do. He’s high/low on 80% of his passes. Once he starts to role out he refuses to look/throw down field. The most frustrating part to me is knowing the season will have to bottom out before they make a switch. This game wasn’t just a bad game. It’s who we are on offense & it’s going to waste this defense.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: SkinnyBenny on September 18, 2022, 07:58:16 AM
This one also feels different because the expectations for the season were so high.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 18, 2022, 08:10:00 AM
This one also feels different because the expectations for the season were so high.

I’m having a very hard time not thinking this is 2004 all over again, but it’s wasting a much better defense.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2022, 09:29:14 AM
recency bias
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 18, 2022, 09:40:21 AM
Martinez had a first and ten late in the game (last drive?) and just ran out of bounds ten feet before he got close to the defender. That left us with a second and four and then third and three and then 4th and one that we non shockingly didn’t covert. Never thought I’d say this but why not give someone else a shot. That dude really didn’t seem to care. I’m not asking him to put his body in harms way or initiate contact but he easily could’ve made it 2nd and two instead of second and four with just a mild amount of effort with the game completely on the line.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 18, 2022, 10:03:49 AM
recency bias

The guy was a turnover machine that shattered his jaw/shredded his should & now turtles at everything.  Unless they’re going to Rube Baker him & have him start reciting playmate bios as he plays, I’m not sure what further back data there is offset the recent data that results in him being a good QB.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 18, 2022, 10:07:05 AM
recency bias

The guy was a turnover machine that shattered his jaw/shredded his should & now turtles at everything.  Unless they’re going to Rube Baker him & have him start reciting playmate bios as he plays, I’m not sure what further back data there is offset the recent data that results in him being a good QB.
It couldn’t hurt


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 18, 2022, 10:17:34 AM
To his credit on the passing, he’s probably doing close to what they asked him to do thinking the OL wasn’t going to crap the bed.  Adrian’s performance is taking the heat off that shitshow.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: wetwillie on September 18, 2022, 10:25:18 AM
I think they have to play panzer at Center and Leingang at RG if KT can go next week. Gillum can’t hack.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Pete on September 18, 2022, 10:42:27 AM
Espn+ stopped working at the watch party when it was still 0-0. Probably a blessing on a few fronts. Call for hyperlocal anecdotes.

Yeah, my ESPN+ worked fine on the ESPN app on my TV for the first half, switched over to watch our sunflower brothers at half and when I came back it made me start from the 1st quarter and wouldnt let me fast forward. I could still watch it on my phone with no issues and eventually figured out that if I fired up my xbox and watched it on the ESPN app on there it was not an issue.

How does that even happen?
Can confirm, happened on my tv as well.  I just gave up.  Sounds like it was for the better.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Same
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on September 18, 2022, 11:36:05 AM
recency bias

The guy was a turnover machine that shattered his jaw/shredded his should & now turtles at everything.  Unless they’re going to Rube Baker him & have him start reciting playmate bios as he plays, I’m not sure what further back data there is offset the recent data that results in him being a good QB.

The recency bias is in thinking this loss is anything close to Arkansas State and others mentioned, I'm not sure this loss is any worse than the '19 and '20 losses to West Virginia.

I've been pretty clear that I think Martinez is broken mentally and probably physically. I would wonder about the lack of confidence in what's behind Martinez
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: TheHamburglar on September 18, 2022, 11:50:01 AM
recency bias

The guy was a turnover machine that shattered his jaw/shredded his should & now turtles at everything.  Unless they’re going to Rube Baker him & have him start reciting playmate bios as he plays, I’m not sure what further back data there is offset the recent data that results in him being a good QB.

The recency bias is in thinking this loss is anything close to Arkansas State and others mentioned, I'm not sure this loss is any worse than the '19 and '20 losses to West Virginia.

I've been pretty clear that I think Martinez is broken mentally and probably physically. I would wonder about the lack of confidence in what's behind Martinez

My bad.
Title: Tulane
Post by: wiley on September 18, 2022, 12:08:17 PM
recency bias

The guy was a turnover machine that shattered his jaw/shredded his should & now turtles at everything.  Unless they’re going to Rube Baker him & have him start reciting playmate bios as he plays, I’m not sure what further back data there is offset the recent data that results in him being a good QB.

The recency bias is in thinking this loss is anything close to Arkansas State and others mentioned, I'm not sure this loss is any worse than the '19 and '20 losses to West Virginia.

I've been pretty clear that I think Martinez is broken mentally and probably physically. I would wonder about the lack of confidence in what's behind Martinez
Probably anecdotal, but as a NYG fan i’ve enjoyed watching 3 coaching staffs try to fix Daniel Jones turnover issue.  The Jason Garrett/Joe Judge experience broke him to the point of only throwing check downs and running routes no longer than sticks on 3rd down.  It was abysmal to watch.  And now that we have Kafka and Daboll, they are doing everything to get Jones to “let it rip”. And so far the only thing we’ve seen in game is sterling shepherd running wide open.

** im not entirely sure it’s fixable for either Martinez or Jones is what im getting at


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: DaBigTrain on September 18, 2022, 01:02:16 PM
Man guys that game really sucked some ass yesterday huh?  :flush:
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: KITNfury on September 18, 2022, 01:06:29 PM
Man guys that game really sucked some ass yesterday huh?  :flush:
Yea, how many weeks until something makes me feel better? Prior to season I felt pretty damn good going to Norman, but reactionary or not, I think OU puts it on us.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: michigancat on October 25, 2022, 02:33:44 PM
WTF did the Tulane QB put on his neck

interesting!

Quote
The band, which is made with similar material as a Fitbit, wraps around the back of the neck and places about 1.2 pounds of pressure on the internal jugular vein, which carries oxygen-free blood from the brain back to the heart.

This increases the blood volume in the skull, providing extra cushion and an airbag effect for the brain against the skull during any impact against or to the head.

“Just putting a little bit of a kink in the hose of the jugular vein or collar is enough to place a teaspoon or two (more blood) in the brain, and that seems to be sort of like bubble wrap or it limits the brain’s ability to move,” said Julian Bailes, Chief Medical Advisor for Q30.

The Q-Collar received FDA approval after the organization assessed the safety and effectiveness of the Q-Collar through several studies. One study featured 284 teenage high school football players. The study found “no significant changes” in deeper tissues of the brain in 77% of the players who wore the Q-Collar compared with only 27% that didn’t wear it.

https://www.actionnetwork.com/ncaaf/q-collar-medical-device-limit-concussions-college-football-nfl?utm_source=Twitter&utm_medium=Social&utm_campaign=BrettMcMurphy
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MadCat on October 25, 2022, 04:32:58 PM
Sketti-brain voodoo
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: ben ji on October 25, 2022, 09:00:32 PM
We need to get all Katz QB's that ASAP and run them 25 times a game.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: sys on October 25, 2022, 09:10:00 PM
man, that's really cool.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: catastrophe on October 25, 2022, 09:42:08 PM
Say what you want about this barbaric sport, but until it dies it’s going to fund a crap ton of research on brain health.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on October 25, 2022, 10:23:35 PM
Say what you want about this barbaric sport, but until it dies it’s going to fund a crap ton of research on brain health.

The football gods hath giveth more than they’ve taketh away.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on October 25, 2022, 11:07:06 PM
Say what you want about this barbaric sport, but until it dies it’s going to fund a crap ton of research on brain health.

The football gods hath giveth more than they’ve taketh away.

ummm, nah
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on October 26, 2022, 12:47:19 AM
How is every player not using it? Incredible results for something so simple.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: MakeItRain on October 26, 2022, 01:19:23 AM
How is every player not using it? Incredible results for something so simple.

Still new technology, same goes for newer helmet technology that not all players and teams are using yet. The more people that use those collars the more people wearing them will get concussions tho.
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: Cire on October 26, 2022, 08:11:36 AM
Can we get one for our QB's shoulders too?
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: nicname on October 29, 2022, 11:55:27 PM
Where does this rank in terms of all time worst losses? Not quite as bad as north Dakota but worse than Marshall?
Arkansas State was probably worse

Oh good point! I had somehow managed to psychologically block that one out. That was bad
This one is worse

Way worse. This is Klieman year four, and we’re looking like complete crap in a home non con loss. Maybe Klein should eat a rough ridin' cheeseburger and teach his QB how to sack up and get crap done.

oof
Title: Re: Tulane
Post by: stunted on October 30, 2022, 01:25:09 AM
How is every player not using it? Incredible results for something so simple.

Still new technology, same goes for newer helmet technology that not all players and teams are using yet. The more people that use those collars the more people wearing them will get concussions tho.

they should say f it and implement it, a whole season of 32 teams doing it should be a big sample size