Author Topic: Supreme Court Cases Thread  (Read 35031 times)

Cire (+ 1 Hidden) and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #425 on: June 25, 2022, 05:59:15 PM »
This thread has not disappointed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you like about it?
Not much, you? Still amazed how many wacky can get to respond him. Also cire tirelessly searching Twitter for his next thought since he can’t come up with his own.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you take exception to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21749
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #426 on: June 25, 2022, 06:02:12 PM »
This thread has not disappointed


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you like about it?
Not much, you? Still amazed how many wacky can get to respond him. Also cire tirelessly searching Twitter for his next thought since he can’t come up with his own.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What do you take exception to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I mean, you do sound a little super earthy/organic.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13252
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #427 on: June 25, 2022, 06:03:03 PM »
Nothing, I just don’t believe you have the capacity to formulate your own thoughts to be honest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #428 on: June 25, 2022, 06:06:22 PM »
Nothing, I just don’t believe you have the capacity to formulate your own thoughts to be honest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think it’s a mistake to repeal roe and I think there’s a lot of unintended consequences to do so


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #429 on: June 25, 2022, 06:11:57 PM »
I’m sorry I posted things that you don’t have Ammo to refute because your beliefs on the issue are faith based


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #430 on: June 25, 2022, 07:21:44 PM »
Waks dipped the hell out of here when he learned IVF is definitely baby killing under the new law.  Ope
We did IUI 5 times. Sorry, I was at a friends doctorate graduation. Hell, yeah, tho! Let’s shame people who want to create life but can’t due to science!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #431 on: June 25, 2022, 07:40:52 PM »
Waks dipped the hell out of here when he learned IVF is definitely baby killing under the new law.  Ope
We did IUI 5 times. Sorry, I was at a friends doctorate graduation. Hell, yeah, tho! Let’s shame people who want to create life but can’t due to science!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So you killed four baby’s to have one in a science experiment rather than adopt or foster.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #432 on: June 25, 2022, 07:43:44 PM »
We tried to have our own you giant weirdo. Last name runs through me. God you is good!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #433 on: June 25, 2022, 07:46:32 PM »
I feel like god didn’t want you go have a baby and science helped. But what do I know.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53904
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #434 on: June 25, 2022, 07:46:48 PM »
Nothing, I just don’t believe you have the capacity to formulate your own thoughts to be honest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you formulate thoughts on Roe being overturned?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #435 on: June 25, 2022, 07:51:05 PM »
You know IUI isn’t IVF, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #436 on: June 25, 2022, 07:54:57 PM »
You know IUI isn’t IVF, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I was thinking ivf


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15268
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #437 on: June 25, 2022, 07:55:41 PM »
You know IUI isn’t IVF, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you have a problem with couples that do use IVF, even though fertilized embryos are discarded?

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #438 on: June 25, 2022, 07:56:21 PM »
Yeah, we did 5 IUI’s. It was a pretty emotional time for my wife. Happy we got a good one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13252
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #439 on: June 25, 2022, 07:58:28 PM »
Nothing, I just don’t believe you have the capacity to formulate your own thoughts to be honest.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did you formulate thoughts on Roe being overturned?
I did, have you?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19870
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #440 on: June 25, 2022, 08:00:08 PM »
My sister had 4 ivf’s and still has embryos frozen which they haven’t decided to try and use yet.

One she lost at week 28 due to some freak complication. It was awful, but the medical term was “aborting the fetus” which was not viable.

Wonder where she’d be if Kansas had a ban.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #441 on: June 25, 2022, 08:03:54 PM »
You know IUI isn’t IVF, right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Do you have a problem with couples that do use IVF, even though fertilized embryos are discarded?
I’m not educated enough to have an opinion on the matter. Like most things, there’s silver linings. If you are raped and forced to have a baby, I think that’s mumped up. If you got drunk and knocked someone up tho, that’s on you. My biggest issue with it are the people acting like it should be a one stop shop for being careless. Wear a condom and pull out with a condom on. Speak to your partner if they’re on birth control too.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6711
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #442 on: June 25, 2022, 08:08:47 PM »
Some people drink to excess and make bad choices. We should ban all alcohol consumption

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #443 on: June 25, 2022, 08:09:09 PM »
After 5 IUI’s, I wasn’t about to throw another 50K on IVF for a 20% chance to land. I never looked into the details on it, because I was done.

My wife feels differently on the matter than I do and I respect her opinions. My parents had my brother when they were 18. I’m happy they stuck with it. I might not be here today if they didn’t, which would probably be great for this board.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #444 on: June 25, 2022, 08:09:49 PM »
Some people drink to excess and make bad choices. We should ban all alcohol consumption
You’re really too emotional sometimes.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6711
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #445 on: June 25, 2022, 08:19:44 PM »
I’m referring to Powell v Texas, this is the SCOTUS thread

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21749
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #446 on: June 25, 2022, 08:22:04 PM »
I'm not sure where people get the idea that other people who wanted to keep Roe were all in favor of "abortion on demand." The polling data overwhelmingly supported upholding Roe, while at the same time, the data also showed that a majority of Americans were in favor of *some* restrictions on abortion. That's exactly what the framework was under Roe. Hate that I have to use past tense verbs, here. 1% of abortions take (took?) place after the approximate point of viability. I would bet my bottom dollar that the vast majority of that 1% is due to really terrible medical complications. There was never any good reason to demonize women seeking abortions or call them "baby killers."

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15911
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #447 on: June 25, 2022, 08:29:04 PM »
So many issues would be better served without involving the federal government. It’s a great day for our republic.
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #448 on: June 25, 2022, 08:32:39 PM »
People who are ok with someone pregnant to have an abortion 3 months in and beyond is what really bothers me. crap or get off the pot.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 21749
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Supreme Court Cases Thread
« Reply #449 on: June 25, 2022, 08:33:31 PM »
So many issues would be better served without involving the federal government. It’s a great day for our republic.

Have you seen our states?