Supreme Court Cases Thread

[sonofdaxjones]

Good ol Andrew Lawrence.  A low self esteem simp.

The kind of dude that Spracs will always gravitate to.

(Using the word “dude” very very loosely here)

So sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sonofdaxjones]

Media matters

[catastrophe]

Good ol Andrew Lawrence.  A low self esteem simp.

The kind of dude that Spracs will always gravitate to.

(Using the word “dude” very very loosely here)

So sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is there anything about the spirit of his tweet you disagree with?

[Spracne]

Good ol Andrew Lawrence.  A low self esteem simp.

The kind of dude that Spracs will always gravitate to.

(Using the word “dude” very very loosely here)

So sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dax--a man in his mid 50's and allegedly married--just used the term "simp."

[sonofdaxjones]

Good ol Andrew Lawrence.  A low self esteem simp.

The kind of dude that Spracs will always gravitate to.

(Using the word “dude” very very loosely here)

So sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Is there anything about the spirit of his tweet you disagree with?

People can opine on whatever they want.

I’ll laugh at, but certainly accept the director or VP of “rapid response” at media matters (stand back people, media matters rapid responder coming through!!) right to opine on whatever he wants.

[sonofdaxjones]

Good ol Andrew Lawrence.  A low self esteem simp.

The kind of dude that Spracs will always gravitate to.

(Using the word “dude” very very loosely here)

So sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dax--a man in his mid 50's and allegedly married--just used the term "simp."

That makes absolutely no sense Spracs aka just one of the herd

[star seed 7]

Good ol Andrew Lawrence.  A low self esteem simp.

The kind of dude that Spracs will always gravitate to.

(Using the word “dude” very very loosely here)

So sad.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dax--a man in his mid 50's and allegedly married--just used the term "simp."

That makes absolutely no sense Spracs aka just one of the herd

Yeah, he's in his early 60's

[sonofdaxjones]

Wrong, as always.

[Spracne]

Late Forties?

[sonofdaxjones]

[chum1]

They've gotta be just dying to undo a lot of the crap they hated at the time.

https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1522222698415329281

[steve dave]

we've got roberts comments on the leak, use the picture of him that screams "it was me" please.

https://twitter.com/axios/status/1522329008150654978

[BIG APPLE CAT]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

[Spracne]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

[Justwin]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

[steve dave]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

 

[Spracne]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

[Justwin]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

There are lots that I've never read. I've never read the Dred Scott decision either.

[Justwin]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

Can you explain to me again why Biden's employer vaccine mandate will be found constitutional again?

[Spracne]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

Can you explain to me again why Biden's employer vaccine mandate will be found constitutional again?

The one that this Court found unconstitutional? Or the government employees one? Thanks for admitting you found Roe wrongly decided without having actually read it, btw.

[steve dave]

trying to fight spracne on supreme court stuff :: a moose trying to fight me

[Spracne]

 

[Justwin]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

Can you explain to me again why Biden's employer vaccine mandate will be found constitutional again?

The one that this Court found unconstitutional? Or the government employees one? Thanks for admitting you found Roe wrongly decided without having actually read it, btw.

The one this court found unconstiutional.

[Spracne]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

Can you explain to me again why Biden's employer vaccine mandate will be found constitutional again?

The one that this Court found unconstitutional? Or the government employees one? Thanks for admitting you found Roe wrongly decided without having actually read it, btw.

The one this court found unconstiutional.

Feel free to quote my post about it. I stand by every word. My thinking hasn't changed, but it appears the Court has.

[Justwin]

so the only potential recourse would be to impeach a sitting Justice...i guess my question would be "is lying during your confirmation hearing an impeachable offense?"

I am not joking when I say that if decision comes down as expected, the Supreme Court just tazed their balls off. eff around and find out kinda stuff.

They tazed their balls off with the original Roe decision.

You mean the one you've never read?

Can you explain to me again why Biden's employer vaccine mandate will be found constitutional again?

The one that this Court found unconstitutional? Or the government employees one? Thanks for admitting you found Roe wrongly decided without having actually read it, btw.

Roe was wrongly decided. I don't have to read the decision if the conclusion it reached was wrong.

Regardless, there are plenty of legal scholars that think Roe was poorly reasoned and there are many in favor of the conclusion that believe it was poorly reasoned. That's enough for me to conclude it was poorly reasoned, especially given that I think the conclusion it reached was wrong.