The Biden (interim) Dictator

[Dugout DickStone]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

[BIG APPLE CAT]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

[sonofdaxjones]

Randomized frontier gibberish . . . thy name is BAC

[BIG APPLE CAT]

sorry you missed out on nancy givin it to ya sloppy style, dax

[sonofdaxjones]

Oh so your post was about Nancy and not about how in your dwindled mind the entirety of the economy in the year of our Flying Spaghetti Monster 2024 leads back to Ronald Reagan.

That's like walking from East to West (or vice versa) in Nepal thinking you're not going to run into a few hills along the way.

[kim carnes]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

Bro wtf are u talking about

[Dugout DickStone]

the free market does free market crap.  Real estate is valuable because there is a finte amount and your loan is expensive because you are a credit risk.  It's been that way for a really long time

[kim carnes]

the free market does free market crap.  Real estate is valuable because there is a finte amount and your loan is expensive because you are a credit risk.  It's been that way for a really long time

dude what are u even saying?  real estate is expensive because of fed and govt policy/spending since covid began

[wetwillie]

Well that and hedge funds taking significant amounts of existing SFH off the market forever.

[Dugout DickStone]

15 year are 5.25.  Not ideal but...

[wetwillie]

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MSPUS

[wetwillie]

https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/LES1252881600Q

[CNS]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

If we are still at a point where we need to wait a few years, the problem is morons not time. 

[BIG APPLE CAT]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

Bro wtf are u talking about

kimberly do i really need to explain this to you or are you just goofin? b/c i mean, i can if you want.

for now i'll just put this here. see how that blue line and red line really start to sharply diverge (or develop a gap) i'll keep going if you'd like but its entirely possible you were just gEin with me

[catastrophe]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

Bro wtf are u talking about

kimberly do i really need to explain this to you or are you just goofin? b/c i mean, i can if you want.

for now i'll just put this here. see how that blue line and red line really start to sharply diverge (or develop a gap) i'll keep going if you'd like but its entirely possible you were just gEin with me

I mean there are probably at least a thousand ways you can explain that graphic aside from pinning it on Regan or even any Regan-era policy.

For example, should we just assume that the relative value of services provided by the top 10% should always stay a consistent ratio vs. the bottom 90%? Why?

[kim carnes]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

Bro wtf are u talking about

kimberly do i really need to explain this to you or are you just goofin? b/c i mean, i can if you want.

for now i'll just put this here. see how that blue line and red line really start to sharply diverge (or develop a gap) i'll keep going if you'd like but its entirely possible you were just gEin with me

You’re blaming reagan for post-covid real estate prices, u sound insane

[Pete]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

Bro wtf are u talking about

kimberly do i really need to explain this to you or are you just goofin? b/c i mean, i can if you want.

for now i'll just put this here. see how that blue line and red line really start to sharply diverge (or develop a gap) i'll keep going if you'd like but its entirely possible you were just gEin with me

You’re blaming reagan for post-covid real estate prices, u sound insane

Earlier in this thread you blamed economic policy for real estate prices, and now you are blaming covid? WHICH IS IT, KIM CARNES?

Also Carnes, this is how capitalism works.  If you are unable to compete the socialist chicken exit is over there, comrade.

[Sandstone Outcropping]

We need to do away with this "president-as-emperor" thingy.

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1756043463181623675?s=20

[kim carnes]

It’s a great economy if you’re a baby boomer with a lot of assets, it’s horrible for anyone who wants to acquire assets at a reasonable price.  So it’s bad for like 95% of the population (really, closer to 99 but I’ll be generous).

I agree with your grievance but I think wealth inequality and the economy are separate conversations.

Wealth inequality didn’t create these conditions, economic policy did.

chicken egg

The optimist in me believes that in the next few years, there will no longer be some mystique about ronald reagan and everyone will realize "oh crap, everything really changed to a shitty trajectory like the day he took office"

Like as a fun game, take just about anything policy-related that you don't like or seems completely unfair to everyone except gazillionaires. 99.9% of the time there is a straight line back to ronnie.

the thing i hate most about him is he did not deserve any of those tornado blowies from nance

Bro wtf are u talking about

kimberly do i really need to explain this to you or are you just goofin? b/c i mean, i can if you want.

for now i'll just put this here. see how that blue line and red line really start to sharply diverge (or develop a gap) i'll keep going if you'd like but its entirely possible you were just gEin with me

You’re blaming reagan for post-covid real estate prices, u sound insane

Earlier in this thread you blamed economic policy for real estate prices, and now you are blaming covid? WHICH IS IT, KIM CARNES?

Also Carnes, this is how capitalism works.  If you are unable to compete the socialist chicken exit is over there, comrade.

Hey bud, the policies were implemented during covid.

[Dugout DickStone]

the ease with which everyone i know has entered and moved about the real estate market must mean I am only friends with rich boomers who were born in the 80s

[star seed 7]

So obviously dax was melting down yesterday, but checking texags today they are also melting down. There are no specifics mentioned (same with dax). What happened yesterday?

[Dugout DickStone]

So obviously dax was melting down yesterday, but checking texags today they are also melting down. There are no specifics mentioned (same with dax). What happened yesterday?

The best I can tell is tucker's interview didn't break the internet and Biden was old AF and no one cared.  And Taylor

[steve dave]

So obviously dax was melting down yesterday, but checking texags today they are also melting down. There are no specifics mentioned (same with dax). What happened yesterday?

Toby Keith went out like Stan Chera?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[sonofdaxjones]

DeflectoBot forgets how horned up #blueanon got about the raid on Trump's place in Florida.  Nothing gets #blueanon/#blueanongE  six to midnight like a good FBI raid.

Now DeflectoBot's boy is too old, feeble and mentally incapacitated to face charges for illegally mishandling classified documents.

If it were a Pub, #blueanongE would have already pooped out about another 40 - 50 pages and 3 additional threads.

[steve dave]

Is that why you were melting down dax? Seems weird.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk