gates

[Trim]

I'm not arguing a position, dax.  You whine about how all the useful idiots have been manipulated to believe/say/do things you disagree with.  Don't get mad at the manipulators or manipulated; just manipulate the useful idiots to your side instead.  Finesse the eff out of them!

[sonofdaxjones]

I'm not arguing a position, dax.  You whine about how all the useful idiots have been manipulated to believe/say/do things you disagree with.  Don't get mad at the manipulators or manipulated; just manipulate the useful idiots to your side instead.  Finesse the eff out of them!

There's no finessing. 

[Trim]

Sounds like whatever the group that is the generals to libderp nation's globetrotters just needs better marketing people.

[sonofdaxjones]

Sounds like whatever the group that is the generals to libderp nation's globetrotters just needs better marketing people.

That doesn't make any sense.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

 https://twitter.com/lt_freedom/status/1253777479938048001

[Trim]

Sounds like whatever the group that is the generals to libderp nation's globetrotters just needs better marketing people.

That doesn't make any sense.

[sonofdaxjones]

Dale targeted that at those with open minds and less taken with hyperbolic overtures.

That's opposite world for Useful Idiot Nation

[Dugout DickStone]

https://twitter.com/lt_freedom/status/1253777479938048001

1000% MAGA

[Dugout DickStone]

Why not just fund free birth control?  Would be much better at controlling costs.

Isn't that kinda what they're doing at Planned Parenthood, except waiting to kill babies that have developed heartbeats and can feel pain?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Did you really just check with that crazy dude and his hooker wife!?!?!   

You refused to answer my question.  That's how valid this one is.

Time to move on to one that hasn't been completely destroyed

I take it you're not a "bidness man"....

Let's see, free birth control = HUGE cash outlays to purchase said birth control = MASSIVE negative cash flow/financial expense

On the other hand, selling 7 BILLION "hits" of a vaccine = HUGE positive cash flows/revenues = MASSIVE PROFITS

Guys.  Look at professor business over here has typed one of the most opposite things in the history of idiots.

[Trim]

Dale targeted that at those with open minds and less taken with hyperbolic overtures.

That's opposite world for Useful Idiot Nation

Well that’s good, open-minded Dax. Maybe it’ll teach you and your ilk how to influence all the useful idiots and make them more useful for you.

[Trim]

Why not just fund free birth control?  Would be much better at controlling costs.

Isn't that kinda what they're doing at Planned Parenthood, except waiting to kill babies that have developed heartbeats and can feel pain?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Did you really just check with that crazy dude and his hooker wife!?!?!   

You refused to answer my question.  That's how valid this one is.

Time to move on to one that hasn't been completely destroyed

I take it you're not a "bidness man"....

Let's see, free birth control = HUGE cash outlays to purchase said birth control = MASSIVE negative cash flow/financial expense

On the other hand, selling 7 BILLION "hits" of a vaccine = HUGE positive cash flows/revenues = MASSIVE PROFITS

Guys.  Look at professor business over here has typed one of the most opposite things in the history of idiots.

I was still lol’n at this one last night while walking the dog. Can’t collectively lol in the office these days.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

https://twitter.com/cjtruth/status/1253782815147266050

[Dugout DickStone]

Why not just fund free birth control?  Would be much better at controlling costs.

Isn't that kinda what they're doing at Planned Parenthood, except waiting to kill babies that have developed heartbeats and can feel pain?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Did you really just check with that crazy dude and his hooker wife!?!?!   

You refused to answer my question.  That's how valid this one is.

Time to move on to one that hasn't been completely destroyed

I take it you're not a "bidness man"....

Let's see, free birth control = HUGE cash outlays to purchase said birth control = MASSIVE negative cash flow/financial expense

On the other hand, selling 7 BILLION "hits" of a vaccine = HUGE positive cash flows/revenues = MASSIVE PROFITS

Guys.  Look at professor business over here has typed one of the most opposite things in the history of idiots.

I was still lol’n at this one last night while walking the dog. Can’t collectively lol in the office these days.

I think he will likely take the Trump "sarcasm" route to explain this one.  No one can actually believe that available cheap generic BC would cost more than sickening your entire population with crippling illness that will require extensive emergency medical care.  Or that the latter would somehow be faster when it will take generations. Good one bqqk

[Trim]

Why not just fund free birth control?  Would be much better at controlling costs.

Isn't that kinda what they're doing at Planned Parenthood, except waiting to kill babies that have developed heartbeats and can feel pain?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Did you really just check with that crazy dude and his hooker wife!?!?!   

You refused to answer my question.  That's how valid this one is.

Time to move on to one that hasn't been completely destroyed

I take it you're not a "bidness man"....

Let's see, free birth control = HUGE cash outlays to purchase said birth control = MASSIVE negative cash flow/financial expense

On the other hand, selling 7 BILLION "hits" of a vaccine = HUGE positive cash flows/revenues = MASSIVE PROFITS

Guys.  Look at professor business over here has typed one of the most opposite things in the history of idiots.

I was still lol’n at this one last night while walking the dog. Can’t collectively lol in the office these days.

I think he will likely take the Trump "sarcasm" route to explain this one.  No one can actually believe that available cheap generic BC would cost more than sickening your entire population with crippling illness that will require extensive emergency medical care.  Or that the latter would somehow be faster when it will take generations. Good one bqqk

 I liked the lack of expense involved with vaccines when determining profit.

[sonofdaxjones]

Dale targeted that at those with open minds and less taken with hyperbolic overtures.

That's opposite world for Useful Idiot Nation

Well that’s good, open-minded Dax. Maybe it’ll teach you and your ilk how to influence all the useful idiots and make them more useful for you.

Deranged monolithic thinkers are not easily swayed

[Bqqkie Pimp]

You’ve either totally missed the point, or intentionally redirected the argument as a good lawyer would.

This wasn’t about societal or governmental costs. I was simply talking about potential expenses/revenues for gates in that scenario

My point, as easily inferred, was that if gates wanted to reduce population through “free” birth control, that would be a huge cost to him as “someone” would have to pay for the BC.

On the other hand, he stands to make billions selling his vaccines. I have no earthly idea how you got to the point that he’d be covering the long term medical health costs. That doesn’t seem to be any of his concern and as such that’d fall on us peasants that pay taxes.

[chum1]

[Dugout DickStone]

You’ve either totally missed the point, or intentionally redirected the argument as a good lawyer would.

This wasn’t about societal or governmental costs. I was simply talking about potential expenses/revenues for gates in that scenario

My point, as easily inferred, was that if gates wanted to reduce population through “free” birth control, that would be a huge cost to him as “someone” would have to pay for the BC.

On the other hand, he stands to make billions selling his vaccines. I have no earthly idea how you got to the point that he’d be covering the long term medical health costs. That doesn’t seem to be any of his concern and as such that’d fall on us peasants that pay taxes.

Your premise was that he was working with the government to reduce their costs.  It said that in the links you sent.

So your premise is now that 64 year old Bill Gates (with a net worth of over $100 bn) wants to now SPEND 100's of millions of dollars to attempt to develop a vaccine that will cripple the entire population so he can make more money but would also kill lots of consumers who won't be able to buy his already developed and insanely profitable and legal products.

Can I sell you some real estate?  How about a cure for Covid? (I have it trust me)

[Bqqkie Pimp]

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iK6SS8CXYZo[/youtube]

Damn you, Al Pieda!!! 

[Dugout DickStone]

Why not just fund free birth control?  Would be much better at controlling costs.

Isn't that kinda what they're doing at Planned Parenthood, except waiting to kill babies that have developed heartbeats and can feel pain?

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

Did you really just check with that crazy dude and his hooker wife!?!?!   

You refused to answer my question.  That's how valid this one is.

Time to move on to one that hasn't been completely destroyed

I take it you're not a "bidness man"....

Let's see, free birth control = HUGE cash outlays to purchase said birth control = MASSIVE negative cash flow/financial expense

On the other hand, selling 7 BILLION "hits" of a vaccine = HUGE positive cash flows/revenues = MASSIVE PROFITS

Guys.  Look at professor business over here has typed one of the most opposite things in the history of idiots.

I was still lol’n at this one last night while walking the dog. Can’t collectively lol in the office these days.

I think he will likely take the Trump "sarcasm" route to explain this one.  No one can actually believe that available cheap generic BC would cost more than sickening your entire population with crippling illness that will require extensive emergency medical care.  Or that the latter would somehow be faster when it will take generations. Good one bqqk

 I liked the lack of expense involved with vaccines when determining profit.

Self proclaimed bidness men never actually know crap about bidness

[Trim]

Dale targeted that at those with open minds and less taken with hyperbolic overtures.

That's opposite world for Useful Idiot Nation

Well that’s good, open-minded Dax. Maybe it’ll teach you and your ilk how to influence all the useful idiots and make them more useful for you.

Deranged monolithic thinkers are not easily swayed

You're gonna have to quit calling them useful as you're apparently incapable of using them for your purposes.

[CHONGS]

[Institutional Control]

Monolithic thinkers are generally very easily swayed.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

You’ve either totally missed the point, or intentionally redirected the argument as a good lawyer would.

This wasn’t about societal or governmental costs. I was simply talking about potential expenses/revenues for gates in that scenario

My point, as easily inferred, was that if gates wanted to reduce population through “free” birth control, that would be a huge cost to him as “someone” would have to pay for the BC.

On the other hand, he stands to make billions selling his vaccines. I have no earthly idea how you got to the point that he’d be covering the long term medical health costs. That doesn’t seem to be any of his concern and as such that’d fall on us peasants that pay taxes.

Your premise was that he was working with the government to reduce their costs.  It said that in the links you sent.

So your premise is now that 64 year old Bill Gates (with a net worth of over $100 bn) wants to now SPEND 100's of millions of dollars to attempt to develop a vaccine that will cripple the entire population so he can make more money but would also kill lots of consumers who won't be able to buy his already developed and insanely profitable and legal products.

Can I sell you some real estate?  How about a cure for Covid? (I have it trust me)

That takes a bit of mental gymnastics to see how you got there, however I can openly admit that I see where the misunderstanding comes from.

I was not discussing this from the premise of reducing governmental costs however...  Sometime back, someone (cant remember who and don't feel like going back to look) asked some form of "what's in it for gates" or "why would he want to do that", to which I replied "world depopulation" and/or :kstategrad (money)

Based on the former premise, I agree. It'd be more expensive for society.  Based on the latter, I remain correct.

By the way, what are his "already developed and insanely profitable products & legal products"?

[Spracne]

Monolithic thinkers are generally very easily swayed.

This has been bugging me, but I can't remember what you changed your name from. Help a brother out?