gates

[Dugout DickStone]

"I have often spelled 'who' as 'how' and claimed its a simple misspelling and it's not at all because I struggle with simple methods of communication"

A word with the same 3 letters is never inadvertently misspelled!!   (Super Slow Dug:  Perpetually Angry- Easily Manipulated - Useful Idiot)

Are you going to run away and cry again?

[Rage Against the McKee]

An owl would spell it "hoo".

[Rage Against the McKee]

Rick Flair would spell it "woooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo".

[Dugout DickStone]

I guess it's obvious and I'm missing it but what is Bill Gates's motivation?

This is a great question because bookie/dax think you’re asking what his motivation is to make a vaccine and everyone else thinks you’re asking what his motivation is for whatever bookie/dax thinks he’s doing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I am still wondering why he invented windows and became so rich?  Like, what is your deal Gates?

[sonofdaxjones]

I guess it's obvious and I'm missing it but what is Bill Gates's motivation?

This is a great question because bookie/dax think you’re asking what his motivation is to make a vaccine and everyone else thinks you’re asking what his motivation is for whatever bookie/dax thinks he’s doing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He apparently is making a vaccine . . . but so are literally, like, dozens, if not hundreds of other entities who are comprised of what is collectively 1000's of years of medical/pharmaceutical research and drug production experience.   So asking why TechnoOligarch Bill Gates is also in the vaccine business is pretty relevant given the hyper monopolistic and proprietary licensing ways (with no expiration) of the company that created his wealth (as he touts a digital immunization certificate that uses his companies highly proprietary platforms). 

[Institutional Control]

I guess it's obvious and I'm missing it but what is Bill Gates's motivation?

This is a great question because bookie/dax think you’re asking what his motivation is to make a vaccine and everyone else thinks you’re asking what his motivation is for whatever bookie/dax thinks he’s doing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He apparently is making a vaccine . . . but so are literally, like, dozens, if not hundreds of other entities who are comprised of what is collectively 1000's of years of medical/pharmaceutical research and drug production experience.   So asking why TechnoOligarch Bill Gates is also in the vaccine business is pretty relevant given the hyper monopolistic and proprietary licensing ways (with no expiration) of the company that created his wealth (as he touts a digital immunization certificate that uses his companies highly proprietary platforms).

Oh wow. I had no idea Bill Gates was so sinister. 

[Bqqkie Pimp]

I guess it's obvious and I'm missing it but what is Bill Gates's motivation?

This is a great question because bookie/dax think you’re asking what his motivation is to make a vaccine and everyone else thinks you’re asking what his motivation is for whatever bookie/dax thinks he’s doing.

Nope.  His motivation(s) seem(s) to be two-fold....

One, world de-population as he's on record discussing.

and two....



But, mainly world depopulation.


https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:8UaszQkH2WMJ:https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Thierry_De_Mees3/post/What_do_you_know_about_Global_Warming_what_are_there_causes_And_can_we_prevent_it_and_how/attachment/5e431b18cfe4a740247fde87/AS%253A857503030063105%25401581456062398/download/Bill%2BGates%2BAdmits%2BVaccines%2BAre%2BUsed%2Bfor%2BHuman%2BDepopulation.pdf+&cd=10&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us

Bill Gates Admits Vaccines Are Used for Human Depopulation

https://www.ted.com/talks/bill_gates_innovating_to_zero/discussion
https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/salud/salud_vacunas55.htm

In a recent TED conference presentation, Microsoft billionaire Bill Gates donated hundreds of millions of dollars to new vaccine efforts, speaks on the issue of CO2 emissions and its effects on climate change.

He presents a formula for tracking CO2 emissions as follows:

CO2 = P x S x E x C.

P = People
S = Services per person
E = Energy per serviceC = CO2 per energy unit
Then he adds that in order to get CO2 to zero,"probably one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty close to zero."

Following that, Bill Gates begins to describe how the first number - P (for People) - might be reduced.

He says: "The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."  Watch this for yourself...

Reducing the world population through vaccines

This statement by Bill Gates was not made with any hesitation, stuttering or other indication that it might have been a mistake. It appears to have been a deliberate,calculated part of a well developed and coherent presentation.

So what does it mean when Bill Gates says,"if we do a really great job on new vaccines... we could lower [world population] by 10 or15 percent?" Clearly, this statement implies that vaccines are a method of population reduction.

So is "health care," which all Natural News readers already know to be more of a "sick care" system that actually harms more people than it helps. Perhaps that's the whole point of it.

Given that vaccines technology help almost no one from a scientific point of view, it raises the question:For what purpose are vaccines being so heavily pushed in the first place?Bill Gates seems to be saying that one of the primary purposes is to reduce the global population as a mechanism by which we can reduce CO2 emissions.

Once again, watch the video yourself to hear him say it in his own words...

How can vaccines actually be used to reduce world population?

Let's conduct a mental experiment on this issue. If vaccines are to be used to reduce world population, they obviously need to be accepted by the majority of the people.

Otherwise the population reduction effort wouldn't be very effective.

And in order for them to be accepted by the majority of the people, they obviously can't just kill people outright. If everybody started dropping dead within 24 hours of receiving the flu shot, the danger of vaccines would become obvious rather quickly and the vaccines would be recalled.

Thus, if vaccines are to be used as an effective population reduction effort, there are really only three ways in which they might theoretically be "effective" from the point of view of those who wish to reduce world population:

1. They might kill people slowly in a way that's unnoticeable, taking effect over perhaps 10- 30 years by accelerating degenerative diseases.

2. They might reduce fertility and therefore dramatically lower birth rates around the world,thereby reducing the world population over successive generations. This "soft kill" method might seem more acceptable to scientists who want to see the world population fall but don't quite have the stomach to outright kill people with conventional medicine. There is already evidence that vaccines may promote miscarriages.

3. They might increase the death rate from a future pandemic. Theoretically, widespread vaccination efforts could be followed by a deliberate release of a highly virulent flu strain with a high fatality rate. This "bioweapon" approach could kill millions of people whose immune systems have been weakened by previous vaccine injections. This is a known side effect of some vaccines, by the way.

A study documenting this was published in PLoS. Read the story here.

Here's the study title and citation:

Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1Pandemic Virus?
Viboud C, Simonsen L (2010)
Does Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Increase the Risk of Illness with the 2009 A/H1N1Pandemic Virus?
PLoS Med 7(4): e1000259. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000259
The short answer is yes, seasonal flu vaccines do cause increased susceptibility to theH1N1 pandemic virus.

In other words, seasonal flu vaccines could set up the population for a "hard kill" pandemic that could wipe out a significant portion of the global population (perhaps 10 to 15 percent,as Bill Gates suggested ).

Conveniently, their deaths could be blamed on the pandemic, thereby diverting blame from those who were really responsible for the plot. As yet another beneficial side effect for the global population killers, the widespread deaths could be used as a fear tool to urge more people to get vaccinated yet again, and the entire cycle could be repeated until world population was brought down to whatever manageable level was desired... all in the name of health care!

The more people around the world are vaccinated before the release of the "hard kill" pandemic virus, the more powerful the effect of this approach.




The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Perhaps not coincidentally, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has funneled hundreds of millions of dollars into vaccine programs targeting people all over the world.

One such program is researching the development of "sweat-triggered vaccines" thatcould use specially-coated nano-materials to deliver vaccines to people without using injections.

More interestingly, his foundation has also invested millions in sterilization technologies that have been called a "temporary castration" solution.

It seems that the actions of the Gates foundation are entirely consistent with the formula for CO2 reduction that Bill Gates eluded to in his TED conference speech:
CO2 = P x S x E x C

By reducing birth rates (through sterilization technologies) and increasing vaccine penetration throughout the world population (by using sweat-triggered nano-vaccines), his stated goal of reducing the world population by 10 to 15 percent could be reached within just a few years.



Who will be left alive?  The smart people.

The interesting thing about all this is that this campaign to reduce global population through vaccines will obviously not impact people who consciously avoid vaccines.

And those people, by and large, tend to be the more intelligent, capable people who actually have an improved ability to move human civilization forward with thoughtful consideration.

I can only imagine that those people designing this vaccine-induced population control measure might be sitting around a table chuckling to themselves and saying, "It's only the stupid people that are going to be killed off anyway, so this is actually helping the future of humankind!" (Their words, not mine.) In a weird world government kind of way, this effort might actually be based on some distorted vision of philanthropy where some of the most powerful people in the world quite literally believe the way to save humanity is to kill off as many of the gullible people as possible.



Vaccines are, in effect, an "evil genius" kind of way to conduct an IQ test on the population at large:

If you go get vaccinated every flu season, you're not too bright and probably don't engage the kind of strong mental faculties that humanity will no doubt need if it is to face a future where it is now all but obvious we are not alone in the universe. If humanity is to save itself from its own destruction and compete as an uplifted species in our universe, killing off the least intelligent members of society (or making them infertile)may appear to the world controllers to be a perfectly reasonable approach. I disagree with that approach, but it may be precisely what they are thinking.

In any case, choosing to receive a seasonal flu shot is undoubtedly an admission that you have failed some sort of universal IQ test, whether or not this is the intention of world influencers such as Bill Gates.

More importantly, it is also a betrayal of your own biology, because it indicates you don'tbelieve in the ability of your own immune system to protect you even from mild infections.

Perhaps the world vaccine conspirators figure that if people are willing to betray themselves anyway, it's not much different for governments and institutions to betray them as well. 

In other words, if you don't even care enough about your own health to take care of your health, why should any government care about protecting your health, either?

As you ponder this, also consider something else: The U.S. is going broke due to sick-care costs which are rising dramatically under the new federal health care reform guidelines.

Can you guess the fastest and easiest way to reduce those health care costs?

If you guessed,"unleash a hard-kill pandemic that takes out a significant portion of the weak or sick people" then you guessed right. Sadly, killing off those most vulnerable to sickness could save the U.S. government literally billions of dollars in sick-care expenditures. Plus, it would save Social Security yet more billions by avoiding ongoing monthly payouts.

(Again, I am completely against such an approach because I value human life, but I also know we live in a world where the people in charge have little or no respect for human life and will readily sacrifice human lives to achieve their aims.)

As far as Bill Gates goes, consider his statement in the context of what we've discussed here:

"The world today has 6.8 billion people... that's headed up to about 9 billion. Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15 percent."It suddenly seems to make a lot of sense when you understand that reducing the population reduces CO2 emissions, and using more vaccines on more people increases the death rate of the population.My advice? Try to avoid being among those 10 to 15 percent who get culled through global vaccine programs.



You will not only save your life, you'll also pass the "universal IQ test" which determines whether you're smart enough to know that injecting your body with chemicals and viral  fragments in order to stop "seasonal flu" is a foolish endeavor.   

Be healthy and wise, and you'll survive the world depopulation effort that victimizes conventional thinkers who don't have the intelligence to question what they're being told to do by their own corrupt government

[Rage Against the McKee]

People who have access to vaccines have fewer kids because they expect all of the kids they have to survive to adulthood.

[Spracne]

[Bqqkie Pimp]

People who have access to vaccines have fewer kids because they expect all of the kids they have to survive to adulthood.

Ok, I lol'd... well played.

 

[sonofdaxjones]

1000's of years of collective vaccine creation at work . . . but now, they can't get it done without Bill Gates - Check

[Trim]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

Interesting.  Who doesn't deserve to live?

[chum1]

1000's of years of collective vaccine creation at work . . . but now, they can't get it done without Bill Gates - Check

You can have your trash socialist vaccine. But this is the U.S. of A. and I'm not settling for anything less than the BEST healthcare. I want the Gates Vaccine^TM!

[LickNeckey]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

Interesting.  Who doesn't deserve to live?

Ultimately depopulation is probably best for our species and planet.

I don't mean in terms of eliminating current individuals but rather taking productive steps to address birthrate and pop growth in developing nations

[Dugout DickStone]

I guess it's obvious and I'm missing it but what is Bill Gates's motivation?

This is a great question because bookie/dax think you’re asking what his motivation is to make a vaccine and everyone else thinks you’re asking what his motivation is for whatever bookie/dax thinks he’s doing.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

He apparently is making a vaccine . . . but so are literally, like, dozens, if not hundreds of other entities who are comprised of what is collectively 1000's of years of medical/pharmaceutical research and drug production experience.   So asking why TechnoOligarch Bill Gates is also in the vaccine business is pretty relevant given the hyper monopolistic and proprietary licensing ways (with no expiration) of the company that created his wealth (as he touts a digital immunization certificate that uses his companies highly proprietary platforms).

Oh wow. I had no idea Bill Gates was so sinister.

Also had no idea he was in the vaccine business. crap, peel the onion stuff right here

[Trim]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

Interesting.  Who doesn't deserve to live?

Well, nobody would have to cease living unnaturally. It’d just be a matter of not exponentially adding people.

[Bqqkie Pimp]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

Interesting.  Who doesn't deserve to live?

Well, nobody would have to cease living unnaturally. It’d just be a matter of not exponentially adding people.

Poisoning people with vaccines that cause a slow, disease ridden death as gates describes in the Ted Talk linked above is very much "cease living unnaturally".

There's  YUUUGGE difference between not reproducing exponentially and actually killing people off with vaccines as he has clearly proposed.

[Trim]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

Interesting.  Who doesn't deserve to live?

Well, nobody would have to cease living unnaturally. It’d just be a matter of not exponentially adding people.

Poisoning people with vaccines that cause a slow, disease ridden death as gates describes in the Ted Talk linked above is very much "cease living unnaturally".

There's  YUUUGGE difference between not reproducing exponentially and actually killing people off with vaccines as he has clearly proposed.

Sorry, I forgot to have already posted my at that ted talk recap.

Vaccines make people live longer, and in turn expand the prospects of more spawn coming from them.

Now if we wanted to speed thing up, I volunteer to take on the burdensome duty of Judge’n who gots to go now. I’d start with all cigarette smokers, save maybe a dozen.

[Dugout DickStone]

I think I’m pro-depopulation but I disagree that vaccines are a good step toward that goal.

Interesting.  Who doesn't deserve to live?

Well, nobody would have to cease living unnaturally. It’d just be a matter of not exponentially adding people.

Poisoning people with vaccines that cause a slow, disease ridden death as gates describes in the Ted Talk linked above is very much "cease living unnaturally".

There's  YUUUGGE difference between not reproducing exponentially and actually killing people off with vaccines as he has clearly proposed.

So, that dipshit wrote that the goal is to kill them slowly with a disease ridden death thereby reducing the government's medical costs?  And it will literally take 100s of years (well after Gates is dead) to even work slightly?

That is only a plan the stroke compromised idiots could buy.  Like, can I sell idiots who believe that some total crap or are they too poor to be worth grifting?

[Dugout DickStone]

Soros:  "Hey Bill, in order to reduce CO2 we want you to come up with the dumbest, slowest, least effective and hardest to conceal plan. It should also have some pretty significant health benefits and may actually increase population but it needs to include that."

Gates: "Vaccines!"

[Bqqkie Pimp]

Soros:  "Hey Bill, in order to reduce CO2 we want you to come up with the dumbest, slowest, least effective and hardest to conceal plan."

Gates: "Vaccines!"

Pretty much nailed it...  (after a small edit for accuracy)

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaF-fq2Zn7I[/youtube]

03:54 - "This equation has four factors, a little bit of multiplication. So you've got a thing on the left, CO2, that you want to get to zero, and that's going to be based on the number of people, the services each person is using on average, the energy, on average, for each service, and the CO2 being put out per unit of energy. So let's look at each one of these, and see how we can get this down to zero. Probably, one of these numbers is going to have to get pretty near to zero."

04:29 -- "First, we've got population. The world today has 6.8 billion people. That's headed up to about nine billion. Now, if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by, perhaps, 10 or 15 percent. But there, we see an increase of about 1.3."

 

[Dugout DickStone]

Why not just fund free birth control?  Would be much better at controlling costs.

[Trim]

https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bill-gates-vaccinations-depopulation/

[star seed 7]

Snopes is owned by liberal globalists