Author Topic: Kansas Completely Irrelevant  (Read 23784 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #50 on: June 07, 2010, 08:04:12 PM »
Look at the actual numbers Ben . . . and should I post Lew's quotes again from this last April about ku athletics operating in the red??

There's a reason the IRS is still auditing ku athletics.




Offline pike

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5138
  • BIG GREEN EGG!!!!
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #51 on: June 07, 2010, 09:59:58 PM »
My guess is he goes to whichever offers first.  Nail in KU basketball's coffin.  They had a pretty nice run despite all the violations and junk. 

Rapings, shootings, DUIs, and fast food incidents.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #52 on: June 07, 2010, 11:13:46 PM »
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/stewart_mandel/06/07/expansion-scenarios/index.html


Some highlights from the article:


Quote
6. Kansas becomes a LeBron-like free agent.
One of the great mysteries amid the ongoing Pac-16 speculation is what will become of Kansas, which, while not necessarily a football power, has a huge alumni base, sits in a decent TV market and, most notably, boasts one of the nation's most prestigious basketball programs. It's seems hard to believe the Jayhawks will fade into the wilderness.

Kansas has pledged its loyalty to the Big 12, but if the league implodes, who's to say the Big Ten wouldn't couple KU with Missouri? For all we know, Jim Delany prefers the Jayhawks. If not the Big Ten, what about the basketball-centric Big East, which knows no geographic bounds (see: Marquette)? It could be that KU can't go anywhere without K-State, thus diminishing its appeal, but if not, another major program could be changing major conferences.


Quote
11. A new conference is born.
For a brief, glorious four-year run in the early '90s, Nick Van Exel (Cincinnati), Penny Hardaway (Memphis) and Tom Kleinschmidt (DePaul) wreaked havoc in the short-lived Great Midwest. Why not bring it back -- only with a different lineup and a football edition?
I hereby propose the following consortium of teams plucked from the potential wreckage of the Big 12 and Big East: Cincinnati, Memphis, Louisville, West Virginia, USF, Connecticut, Kansas, Kansas State, Iowa State and Baylor. With a couple of strong years, who's to say this league wouldn't qualify for BCS status?




Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42623
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #53 on: June 08, 2010, 12:16:20 AM »
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/stewart_mandel/06/07/expansion-scenarios/index.html


Some highlights from the article:


Quote
6. Kansas becomes a LeBron-like free agent.

Both 2nd-round losers?  :dunno:

Offline FHSU92

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #54 on: June 08, 2010, 08:06:09 AM »
Would they be more attractive than ksu if teams could actually fly into Lawrence like they can with the Hat?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #55 on: June 08, 2010, 09:03:31 AM »
Butt hurt squawkville has cranked the validation and affirmation up to 11 . . . shooting for 12.


Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #56 on: June 08, 2010, 10:33:21 AM »
ku fans are not taking this confirmation of their irrelevance very well. 


Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #57 on: June 08, 2010, 10:45:15 AM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53907
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #58 on: June 08, 2010, 11:00:12 AM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

Pac 10 couldn't care less about ku.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47951
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #59 on: June 08, 2010, 11:45:05 AM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

Pac 10 couldn't care less about ku.
only b/c the P10 listens to 810 and also had read Pete's post about the schools being connected.  if it weren't for Pete and BITB, KU would already be in the PAC 10 or Conference Elite.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline FHSU92

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #60 on: June 08, 2010, 12:13:01 PM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

What's the "unable to" part?  Is it being in a FBI/IRS investigation thingy; or, that they don't have room for a team from Hickrence, KS?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #61 on: June 08, 2010, 12:28:32 PM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

Pac 10 couldn't care less about ku.
only b/c the P10 listens to 810 and also had read Pete's post about the schools being connected.  if it weren't for Pete and BITB, KU would already be in the PAC 10 or Conference Elite.

You know clams the overall power and weight this board carries across the spectrum of sports and world affairs can be a burden at times . . . but I think you'll agree it's worth it.



Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #62 on: June 08, 2010, 12:51:00 PM »
only b/c the P10 listens to 810 and also had read Pete's post about the schools being connected.  if it weren't for Pete and BITB, KU would already be in the PAC 10 or Conference Elite.

Exactly.  Here's what happened:

1)  Pac 10 "bigwig" really really wants Kansas.
2)  Bigwig reads Pete's post.
3)  Bigwig says, "well, guess we'll take OU/OSU instead.  Shucks."

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23381
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #63 on: June 08, 2010, 12:56:51 PM »
only b/c the P10 listens to 810 and also had read Pete's post about the schools being connected.  if it weren't for Pete and BITB, KU would already be in the PAC 10 or Conference Elite.

Exactly.  Here's what happened:

1)  Pac 10 "bigwig" really really wants Kansas.
2)  Bigwig reads Pete's post.
3)  Bigwig says, "well, guess we'll take OU/OSU instead.  Shucks."

big 10 was a little different though.

1) big 10 wants to expand
2) big 10 studies expansion for like a year
3) big 10 totally wants ku
4) big 10 backs off as soon as they read a quote from BoR member dan lykins online in the topeka capital journal saying that ku and ksu as besties

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7241
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #64 on: June 08, 2010, 01:07:36 PM »
uk trying to convince everyone they are worthy of a megaconference invite reminds me of the scene in Risky Business, where Joel has the guy from Harvard in for an interview while there is a giant party going on around them.


Big 10/Pac 10 Guy:  "Let's see here.  A couple of fluky National Championships, multiple Final Four appearances.....ooooh, are those Helms title banners up there?  JV Tennis.....You've done some solid work but it's just not BCS Conference now, is it?"

uk:  (puts on sunglasses)  "Looks like Mountain West to me!!"

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #65 on: June 08, 2010, 01:11:59 PM »
http://collegesportsblog.dallasnews.com/archives/2010/06/why-texas-tech-got-the-nod-ahead-of-kans.html


Some people in Kansas City have expressed surprise that Texas Tech was included among the six Big 12 schools getting possible invites to the Pac-10, ahead of Kansas and Baylor.

(Don't take offense, Red Raider fans. It's a fair question).

One person with knowledge of the college football landscape offered an interesting explanation. The Texas political scene might make it difficult for Texas and Texas A&M to exit, leaving Tech in a husk of a conference. Rather than risk losing the Longhorns and Aggies, the Pac-10 opted for Tech, which has been extremely competitive in football and has added capacity to Jones AT&T Stadium. Three members in Texas is not necessarily a bad thing.

Kansas has great basketball tradition and some name value, along with bringing the Kansas City market. But the Pac-10 would probably have to take Kansas State along with KU.

Baylor, despite success in just about every sport except football, was hurt by being a private, church-affiliated school. The Pac-10 consists of large, secular, state schools. Remember the reports of how the conference was not sold on BYU? Baylor may have found itself in the same situation, which is a little bit of a shame given the basketball success this past season.



 :curse:




Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55963
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #66 on: June 08, 2010, 01:13:50 PM »
That article is from Friday, bro.  The bolded part is false.

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #67 on: June 08, 2010, 01:14:16 PM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

Pac 10 couldn't care less about ku.




The Pac 10 wants KU, but they don't want K-State.  You guys are like a cancer that won't go away.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38080
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #68 on: June 08, 2010, 01:15:11 PM »
Am I the only one not hearing all the swirling rumors of other conferences wanting KU?

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19406
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #69 on: June 08, 2010, 01:15:20 PM »
I just checked phog on this stuff for the first time.  It seems many are taking solace in the notion that the Pac-10 actually wants to take KU, but is unable to. 

Pac 10 couldn't care less about ku.




The Pac 10 wants KU, but they don't want K-State.  You guys are like a cancer that won't go away.



excellent work...great bbsing.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7175
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #70 on: June 08, 2010, 01:17:53 PM »
That article is from Friday, bro.  The bolded part is false.
Yep it's false, and they are still being passed over. Ouchies.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #71 on: June 08, 2010, 01:18:22 PM »
 :bawl:

It's all K-State's fault. It has nothing to do with your fans not showing up to football games, or your football team sucking. Did you know that the BCS bowl last year with the two mid-majors actually drew better ratings than your Orange Bowl victory over Virginia Tech? To make matters worse, you know that everyone with even a curiosity about KU was watching that game because it was probably the last time KU will ever be in that position.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #72 on: June 08, 2010, 01:20:35 PM »
Poor kid . . . that post was just an absolute fail on every level.

Sad . . .

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59566
    • View Profile
Re: Kansas Completely Irrelevant
« Reply #73 on: June 08, 2010, 01:21:57 PM »
Ben is just relegated to parrotting Tardville talking points . . . it has literally been weeks since he had anything original . . . so very sad.


Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22452
    • View Profile
Re: K-State is dragging KU down with them
« Reply #74 on: June 08, 2010, 01:22:32 PM »
The Pac-10 wants Texas and anyone else needed to get Texas.  That's it.  Whether or not KU and KSU are tied together is completely irrelevant.