0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.
yeah, that's what I'm saying. front line medical, essential workers, then the people who are going to spread it around the absolute most. and I'm assuming that's youngest most to oldest least. if olds are going to be super spreaders I'd listen to that argument but if they've survived to this point I'm guessing they are the opposite of spreaders and we can do a lot more damage against this thing by getting to the people that are.
Quote from: steve dave on November 18, 2020, 09:13:56 PMyeah, that's what I'm saying. front line medical, essential workers, then the people who are going to spread it around the absolute most. and I'm assuming that's youngest most to oldest least. if olds are going to be super spreaders I'd listen to that argument but if they've survived to this point I'm guessing they are the opposite of spreaders and we can do a lot more damage against this thing by getting to the people that are.I'd be okay with this if we were able to get everyone vaccinated fairly quickly. These younger people that you and justwin want to get vaccinated first (early), could potentially have a gap of three quarters to a year before we could get to vaccinating older citizens, that's unacceptable to me. Yes, young people spread it more than the elderly, but the elderly have higher hospitalization and death rates. I think it stands to reason that the burden on hospitals would be significantly less if we could keep the olds and compromised out of them.
Quote from: MakeItRain on November 18, 2020, 10:12:08 PMQuote from: steve dave on November 18, 2020, 09:13:56 PMyeah, that's what I'm saying. front line medical, essential workers, then the people who are going to spread it around the absolute most. and I'm assuming that's youngest most to oldest least. if olds are going to be super spreaders I'd listen to that argument but if they've survived to this point I'm guessing they are the opposite of spreaders and we can do a lot more damage against this thing by getting to the people that are.I'd be okay with this if we were able to get everyone vaccinated fairly quickly. These younger people that you and justwin want to get vaccinated first (early), could potentially have a gap of three quarters to a year before we could get to vaccinating older citizens, that's unacceptable to me. Yes, young people spread it more than the elderly, but the elderly have higher hospitalization and death rates. I think it stands to reason that the burden on hospitals would be significantly less if we could keep the olds and compromised out of them.News reports are saying all US citizens will have it available by April, not 3/4 a year.
What are the things (setting aside government incompetence or sabotage) preventing there from being as many chips as we want being made and implanted? I still doubt it’s anything money can’t solve.
I think that states that performed well should be rewarded and get first crack at vaccines while shitty states like the Dakotas should go last. I like actually changed my life and should go before those idiots who did absolutely nothing to slow the spread. It might actually be more effective in areas where the spread is already low. But seriously I think who you vaccinate depends largely on how many, when, and where they'll be available.
So who is initially going to take receipt of the vaccines? Trump is going to eff with the process almost assuredly.
I'm interested in how the vaccine will be delivered/administered at a local level. Will they show up to my work one day and chip us all like they do with the flu shot?Will I have to go into my Dr's office?Will I get a robo call one day telling me to report to XYZ address as it is my time to get the vaccine?Will they track everyone that didn't get chipped then hunt them down 1 by 1 until everyone has been chipped?
good job outta fresno.https://twitter.com/mmcphate/status/1328934945516105729
I can never remember if the CoronaBros are the one's who wear a mask and stay inside and stuff or people who don't care about getting the virus? I tried reading a few pages of this thread to find out but even context clues have failed me.
Quote from: _33 on November 19, 2020, 10:34:07 AMI can never remember if the CoronaBros are the one's who wear a mask and stay inside and stuff or people who don't care about getting the virus? I tried reading a few pages of this thread to find out but even context clues have failed me.Coronabros wear masks. Manly lovers of freedom do not. Scroll through Clay Travis's twitter feed for reference, he either coined the term or at the very least popularized its use.
They’ve already put out guidelines. Welcome to a week ago (or more), cRusty It was updated today you dumbass. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/daily-life-coping/holidays/thanksgiving.html