Author Topic: CoronaBro Meltdown/SARS-Covid-19 Spitballing Thread  (Read 1065367 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Yeah, saw that yesterday. I'm saying, advertising your bar on social media with a picture of a packed bar, not social distancing, probably isn't smart in the end game right now.
« Last Edit: May 14, 2020, 08:30:42 AM by 420seriouscat69 »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39127
    • View Profile
they're advertising to a certain clientele

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Fair

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85304
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
He makes a great point about the economy and about everything people built for the last 20-30 years and how they’re about to lose it to a .05/1 percent death rate disease. I’m not a Q guy or a Dax guy, but how long are you willing to shutdown for, for a disease that’s killing people with weak immune systems (who are MAINLY suffering)?

wacky, for your own mental well being I'd suggest you mute portney. this is true in pandemic season but also in general.

https://twitter.com/aud_bowler/status/1260673897009160194

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37086
    • View Profile
talking, shouting and singing.

https://twitter.com/carlzimmer/status/1260652736783069184

makes sense that the clubs in Korea led to super-spreading. also another reason restaurants are more likely to cause transmission than grocery stores. I'm not talking to anyone at a grocery store if I can help it.

Is dinner conversation that boisterous?  Thinking its a lot closer to a grocery store risk than a club risk.

obviously depends on the restaurant, but there's definitely more talking at restaurants than grocery stores. I mean the point is usually to talk while you eat.

True.  Guess I'm thinking overall risk profile with tables spread apart and I'm only with my group vs. passing dozens of mouth breathers at the grocery store makes it kind of closer together than when I think of being at Last Chance.

Walking past a mouth breather infected with coronavirus is much less likely to get you sick than sitting 6 feet away from one for a whole hour is.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63975
  • good dog
    • View Profile
He makes a great point about the economy and about everything people built for the last 20-30 years and how they’re about to lose it to a .05/1 percent death rate disease. I’m not a Q guy or a Dax guy, but how long are you willing to shutdown for, for a disease that’s killing people with weak immune systems (who are MAINLY suffering)?

wacky, for your own mental well being I'd suggest you mute portney. this is true in pandemic season but also in general.

https://twitter.com/aud_bowler/status/1260673897009160194

He's such a gigantic douche, feels bad to have him influencing our friend 420seriouscat69.
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
I'm usually a mouth breather because my sinuses aren't quite right. :frown:

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15293
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
talking, shouting and singing.

https://twitter.com/carlzimmer/status/1260652736783069184

makes sense that the clubs in Korea led to super-spreading. also another reason restaurants are more likely to cause transmission than grocery stores. I'm not talking to anyone at a grocery store if I can help it.

Is dinner conversation that boisterous?  Thinking its a lot closer to a grocery store risk than a club risk.

obviously depends on the restaurant, but there's definitely more talking at restaurants than grocery stores. I mean the point is usually to talk while you eat.

True.  Guess I'm thinking overall risk profile with tables spread apart and I'm only with my group vs. passing dozens of mouth breathers at the grocery store makes it kind of closer together than when I think of being at Last Chance.

Walking past a mouth breather infected with coronavirus is much less likely to get you sick than sitting 6 feet away from one for a whole hour is.

Everything I read they are both low risk and much lower risk than a club, which was my entire point.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15293
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
re: my last post, fantastic breakdown of a lot of different spreading event dynamics.

https://twitter.com/mugecevik/status/1257392347010215947

and this study in the Lancet regarding 350 contacts to the first known person to person spread in the US
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30607-3/fulltext

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53174
    • View Profile
The evidence supporting mask use is rolling in on a country-by-country level at this point.

Unfortunately we have a contingent extolling one false narrative after another in the United States.


Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15293
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
The evidence supporting mask use is rolling in on a country-by-country level at this point.

Unfortunately we have a contingent extolling one false narrative after another in the United States.

you can just say the President, it's okay.  Lead by example they say.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53174
    • View Profile
The evidence supporting mask use is rolling in on a country-by-country level at this point.

Unfortunately we have a contingent extolling one false narrative after another in the United States.

you can just say the President, it's okay.  Lead by example they say.

Well, one thing for sure, we can always count on you to inject politics.  I'm surprised you're even posting, figured you'd be rubbing one out while watching Bright's #FearPorn hour.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53174
    • View Profile
re: my last post, fantastic breakdown of a lot of different spreading event dynamics.

https://twitter.com/mugecevik/status/1257392347010215947

and this study in the Lancet regarding 350 contacts to the first known person to person spread in the US
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)30607-3/fulltext

Viral Load?   Useful Idiot.9 and other are going to be super enraged (per usual) to hear that phrase again. 


Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15293
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
The evidence supporting mask use is rolling in on a country-by-country level at this point.

Unfortunately we have a contingent extolling one false narrative after another in the United States.

you can just say the President, it's okay.  Lead by example they say.

Well, one thing for sure, we can always count on you to inject politics.  I'm surprised you're even posting, figured you'd be rubbing one out while watching Bright's #FearPorn hour.

it's not political to point our the #1 in the USA isn't leading by an example in a practice we both want the country's citizens to adopt.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53174
    • View Profile
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus-test-shortages-trigger-a-new-strategy-group-screening2/

This sounds nice.

This is interesting.

And in the proud tradition of Phil Titola, I'll gladly get political.   This article is indicative of how much bullshit the narrative that Barry Obama handed Trump a "playbook" on Pandemic's.    He handed Trump a White Paper backed by a bunch of people talking about things, but not doing much acting on things.   I'm sure the conference locations and expense reports were fantastic, though.




Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15293
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus-test-shortages-trigger-a-new-strategy-group-screening2/

This sounds nice.

This is interesting.

And in the proud tradition of Phil Titola, I'll gladly get political.   This article is indicative of how much bullshit the narrative that Barry Obama handed Trump a "playbook" on Pandemic's.    He handed Trump a White Paper backed by a bunch of people talking about things, but not doing much acting on things.   I'm sure the conference locations and expense reports were fantastic, though.

You continue to be wrong about this and here is the playbook.  Just open it up and see that it's not what you describe.  You don't have to admit it, just stop looking so dumb.  Note: Nobody is "talking about things", it literally talks about how to act on things.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6819268/Pandemic-Playbook.pdf

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19734
    • View Profile


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53174
    • View Profile
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus-test-shortages-trigger-a-new-strategy-group-screening2/

This sounds nice.

This is interesting.

And in the proud tradition of Phil Titola, I'll gladly get political.   This article is indicative of how much bullshit the narrative that Barry Obama handed Trump a "playbook" on Pandemic's.    He handed Trump a White Paper backed by a bunch of people talking about things, but not doing much acting on things.   I'm sure the conference locations and expense reports were fantastic, though.

You continue to be wrong about this and here is the playbook.  Just open it up and see that it's not what you describe.  You don't have to admit it, just stop looking so dumb.  Note: Nobody is "talking about things", it literally talks about how to act on things.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6819268/Pandemic-Playbook.pdf

You can stop the charade that a document actually accomplishes anything.   That's literally nothing but pages of bullet points that can be found on government documents created by working groups by the tens of thousands every year.   It literally accomplishes nothing that matters, but makes everyone feel better about themselves. 

Was there any movement what-so-ever in reducing the ridiculous FDA bureaucracy on to many things to even get into here?   Clearly not.

Was there any attempt to re-domesticate and ramp up production of vital items and materials needed to respond to a world wide pandemic?   Clearly not.

Was there any attempt to de-couple strategically important pharmaceutical items and domesticate them in the United States?   Clearly not.


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44880
    • View Profile
The evidence supporting mask use is rolling in on a country-by-country level at this point.

Unfortunately we have a contingent extolling one false narrative after another in the United States.

you can just say the President, it's okay.  Lead by example they say.

Well, one thing for sure, we can always count on you to inject politics.  I'm surprised you're even posting, figured you'd be rubbing one out while watching Bright's #FearPorn hour.

People are dipshits and they shouldn't be looking for guidance on their.own and their families health from any president or vice president. However, SOME of these people that frustrate us are the very ones most likely to mask up, if the president and vice president do so. I give them a little bit of credit for finally making the workers in the white house wear them, but it's ridiculous that their reasoning for not wearing them is simply tied to vanity.

Offline Phil Titola

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15293
  • He took it out!
    • View Profile
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/coronavirus-test-shortages-trigger-a-new-strategy-group-screening2/

This sounds nice.

This is interesting.

And in the proud tradition of Phil Titola, I'll gladly get political.   This article is indicative of how much bullshit the narrative that Barry Obama handed Trump a "playbook" on Pandemic's.    He handed Trump a White Paper backed by a bunch of people talking about things, but not doing much acting on things.   I'm sure the conference locations and expense reports were fantastic, though.

You continue to be wrong about this and here is the playbook.  Just open it up and see that it's not what you describe.  You don't have to admit it, just stop looking so dumb.  Note: Nobody is "talking about things", it literally talks about how to act on things.

https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/6819268/Pandemic-Playbook.pdf

You can stop the charade that a document actually accomplishes anything.   That's literally nothing but pages of bullet points that can be found on government documents created by working groups by the tens of thousands every year.   It literally accomplishes nothing that matters, but makes everyone feel better about themselves. 

Was there any movement what-so-ever in reducing the ridiculous FDA bureaucracy on to many things to even get into here?   Clearly not.

Was there any attempt to re-domesticate and ramp up production of vital items and materials needed to respond to a world wide pandemic?   Clearly not.

Was there any attempt to de-couple strategically important pharmaceutical items and domesticate them in the United States?   Clearly not.

Those are all valid points but separate from the point of having a strategy for handling a pandemic, something clearly this administration did not have.  Glad Trump got started on them in 2017 :/

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51456
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
The evidence supporting mask use is rolling in on a country-by-country level at this point.

Unfortunately we have a contingent extolling one false narrative after another in the United States.

you can just say the President, it's okay.  Lead by example they say.

Well, one thing for sure, we can always count on you to inject politics.  I'm surprised you're even posting, figured you'd be rubbing one out while watching Bright's #FearPorn hour.

Daqs posts about other men masturbating close to 100% more than anyone I have ever seen.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17576
    • View Profile
Strange to see all the Trumpers complaining that they didn't get an Obama solution to this problem

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
I actually went through that playbook and it assumes that we can test and screen early and does not assume the president will intentionally limit testing because he doesn't want to make his numbers look bad so it doesn't really cover the situation we're in now.

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53771
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile