I really like the current overtime rule, but the over emphasis on the two point conversion is really stupid, imagine losing in the 3rd overtime because of two lousy yards. In a sport where winning and losing a single game means so much, this as a tiebreaker is unconscionable.
There were only three multiple overtime games last year and only one of those went beyond two overtimes. Two of those multiple games were all-time classics and no one wanted them to just "be done with." The NCAA can't get out of it's own way.
25 lousy yards is also stupid
I don't think 25 is a gimme for a lot of college teams but I wouldn't be mad if they move back to the 35 or 40. That's really what they should be doing instead of the football version of a one-on-one layup to determine who wins a game.
This is totally fine with me. I really love CFB's OT rules, so much better than the NFLs (and that's after the much needed fix to who scores first). Moving it back definitely would keep the game focused on the competitive side more. I like rules that force you to perform more.
I though didn't mind the having to go for 2 after 3 OTs. Thinking back for example K-State vs A&M 4OT game, those 2 pt plays in the 3 OT made it more exciting as a fan. I don't think it was that much of a detriment, you still after all had to score a TD to even have the chance to score a 2 pt conversion. Also, at least the 2 pt conversion is at least a football play, not the most lay-uppy play for an extra point. There is more of a earning factor to it.
That being said, if you just go to alternating 2 pt plays then it is junky, it becomes more luck and less skill, and I don't like that.