Author Topic: MEGA MAGA  (Read 449180 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5675 on: February 28, 2022, 08:50:38 AM »

Offline WildcatNkilt

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6923
  • Had the worst birthday ever on Dec. 5th of '98.
    • View Profile
Kansas City Blue Barbecue fan.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5677 on: February 28, 2022, 09:41:21 AM »
i'm confident boebert is that dumb

yeah, that one is a complete palin level moron

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5678 on: February 28, 2022, 03:31:31 PM »

Offline mocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 39042
    • View Profile

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12793
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5680 on: February 28, 2022, 09:31:21 PM »
i'm confident boebert is that dumb

yeah, that one is a complete palin level moron

Be careful what you say, due to Whacky googling AOC and these ladies during his "free time" and could unload at "any time".  :ohno:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5681 on: March 01, 2022, 09:10:36 PM »

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7072
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5682 on: March 01, 2022, 10:07:52 PM »
Boebert had a triumphant moment as well.  Cross post to pos 'pubs thread.

Online Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19680
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5683 on: March 02, 2022, 05:48:16 AM »

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5684 on: March 02, 2022, 07:24:39 AM »
holy crap, lmao


Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5685 on: March 02, 2022, 07:56:00 AM »
good lord

Offline Brock Landers

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7072
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5686 on: March 02, 2022, 08:49:24 AM »
They're grotesque.  Looks just like a couple of howler monkeys.  Will any 'Pub say anything denouncing them?  Don't hold your breath!

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15788
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5687 on: March 02, 2022, 11:31:05 AM »
Woo girls
If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline CHONGS

  • Master of the Atom
  • Administrator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 19381
    • View Profile
    • goEMAW.com
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5688 on: March 02, 2022, 11:41:16 AM »
Two savvy politicians who know their voter base. 

It's the future of the GOP.

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21894
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5689 on: March 02, 2022, 12:02:56 PM »
I'm actually hopeful that the MAGAs will start running out of steam on feeling hyper aggrieved.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5690 on: March 02, 2022, 01:23:23 PM »
I'm actually hopeful that the MAGAs will start running out of steam on feeling hyper aggrieved.

I have no idea what would give you hope of that happening any time soon.

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5691 on: March 02, 2022, 01:42:28 PM »
I'm actually hopeful that the MAGAs will start running out of steam on feeling hyper aggrieved.

I have no idea what would give you hope of that happening any time soon.

they felt attacked by the superbowl commercials.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5692 on: March 02, 2022, 06:09:58 PM »

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5693 on: March 02, 2022, 06:40:03 PM »

Offline Katpappy

  • I got my eye on you
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12793
  • Party on gE
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5694 on: March 02, 2022, 08:13:19 PM »
holy crap, lmao



Looks like they're rehearsing for Trump's mushroom contest.   :lol:
Hot time in Kat town tonight.

Offline Sandstone Outcropping

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 8559
  • a punk who rarely ever took advice
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5695 on: March 03, 2022, 07:35:43 AM »

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85174
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5696 on: March 03, 2022, 08:06:56 AM »

Online Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51305
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5697 on: March 03, 2022, 08:29:50 AM »
trump is going to smack that brave big man

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37049
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5698 on: March 03, 2022, 10:29:13 AM »

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 20946
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: MAGA
« Reply #5699 on: March 03, 2022, 01:59:39 PM »
Sorry if Luk'd:

https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1499191856948662272?s=20&t=upsvmeS_PCq8HrGAply-hQ

Tucker's racist insinuation (that she's not smart/qualified because she's a black woman) is not lost on me. That said, I WOULD like to know the LSAT scores of every Supreme Court justice, just out of my own morbid curiosity. However, I'd bet Tucker would get posterized if we did know. This woman went to Harvard (undergrad + law school), where she was a law review editor. She earned a clerkship at SCOTUS. I won't list all her other accomplishments, but the few I've mentioned are enough for me (as a member of the legal community) to say she must be smart as eff. Still, I would like to know whether I scored higher on the LSAT...