I don’t know why he would, I’m making fun of Pete as much as I’m making fun of people being mad about Pete
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Catastrophe is a moron. He refuses to believe that Pete being deceptive is why anyone cares about this, no one actually cares about McKinsey.
Just a little mom and pop firm, nothing to see here. Some posters have done some work with McKinsey clients, so they're good.
https://twitter.com/propublica/status/1205902893284347904
lol, eff context
I quoted the whole entire post
Pro Publica published that article because of Pete. This message board is 11 years old, the word McKinsey didn't appear until a month ago.
Well no crap. And you posted the article because you let yourself fall for the same stupid talking point since you already disliked Pete.
I already disliked Pete? Interesting, this makes your clumsy defense of him make a bit more sense. I don't dislike Pete, I simply don't trust him, there's a difference. I literally defended him on the previous page. He campaigned for Obama in Iowa before anyone knew who he was, I don't doubt he's a liberal. I want him to stop with the everyman act, he's the only candidate left doing it and I can't help think it's because of immaturity or naivete.
You're also wrong as to my motivation for posting the article, I've told you a half dozen times. Either you're too stupid to understand or you're just being dishonest, which is definitely the case, so I'm just not going to discuss it with you anymore. I am discussing how he's changed how he formed the nature of what he did there, you want to have a discussion about what the firm is, I'm not interested in having that conversation as it's completely irrelevant to my point.