Author Topic: Trump owns Russia (Read 770100 times)

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7475 on:** August 28, 2018, 10:18:49 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 10:16:25 AM

Quote from: sonofdaxjones on August 28, 2018, 10:02:42 AM
. I don’t think it’s particularly grave at all, even if it’s true. I think it’s a very pedestrian event.”

Literal quote, dumdumdax

He was talking about Russian hacking, not direct COLUSION. Again, amaze

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7476 on:** August 28, 2018, 10:27:18 AM »

Lol, ok dax

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7477 on:** August 28, 2018, 10:33:16 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 10:27:18 AM

Lol, ok dax

Nice job LibBot7, you're really nailing it right now.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7478 on:** August 28, 2018, 10:34:11 AM »

What's got you confused today bud, let's work this out for you.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7479 on:** August 28, 2018, 10:53:09 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 10:34:11 AM

What's got you confused today bud, let's work this out for you.

I'll help you out since you didn't read the article.

“We have, all the time, different levels of evidentiary certainty based on the context, based on the role that we’re playing,” Greenwald said. To allege Russian interference in 2016 was to levy a charge against “a longtime adversary of the United States, one that is still in possession of thousands of nuclear weapons aimed at American cities.” He continued, “Before we all accuse that country of having done something so grave as have its leader order the hacking of these e-mails in order to interfere in an election, I think the evidence we demand ought to be pretty high.”

Was the charge “grave”? He had just called it the stuff of everyday international relations. “I personally don’t think it’s grave,” he said. “But there are millions of Americans who believe the election of Trump is this grave threat. So if you convince them that what has endangered them is Putin—you hear Democrats comparing this to 9/11 or Pearl Harbor—that’s really dangerous rhetoric. I don’t think it’s particularly grave at all, even if it’s true. I think it’s a very pedestrian event.” The risk, then—one also identified by President Trump—was that unfounded American hysteria could set off a nuclear war. Put another way: the choice is between Greenwald and the end of the world.

Let me know when we charge Putin with Treason.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7480 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:02:23 AM »

You're right that I'm not going to read an article fellating glenn Greenwald about fellating trump. Keep c&p'n, bolding, and underlining tho if it makes you happy bud, older people find joy in very strange things but no judgement from me

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7481 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:06:10 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 11:02:23 AM

You're right that I'm not going to read an article fellating glenn Greenwald about fellating trump. Keep c&p'n, bolding, and underlining tho if it makes you happy bud, older people find joy in very strange things but no judgement from me

Just admit that you don't get it, it's okay, you're wrong most of the time LibBot7, we all know that already.

Nice

, tho

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7482 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:15:02 AM »

Also lol that dax thinks accusing Russia of interfering in our elections (is it even an accusation anymore? More like a statement of fact) is going to to lead to them shooting nukes at us.

The only chance that happens is if dumbo trump (daxbot hero) let's one off first because he is losing his mind.

Goodness dax, that's pretty crazy even for you. My grandfather with alzheimer's had "bad" days too tho, maybe tomorrow you'll be thinking clearer.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7483 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:16:50 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 11:15:02 AM

Also lol that dax thinks accusing Russia of interfering in our elections (is it even an accusation anymore? More like a statement of fact) is going to to lead to them shooting nukes at us.

The only chance that happens is if dumbo trump (daxbot hero) let's one off first because he is losing his mind.

Goodness dax, that's pretty crazy even for you. My grandfather with alzheimer's had "bad" days too tho, maybe tomorrow you'll be thinking clearer.

Now I wrote that article. That's just fascinating LibBot7.

But good to see you've turned the deflecto shields up to "Full" now.

You're a real geopolitical thinker Lib, great job.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7484 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:20:46 AM »

DaBigTrain · « **Reply #7485 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:22:52 AM »

Dax is getting triggered pretty easily today, sad.

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7486 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:25:59 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 11:20:46 AM

Yep, I mean with the United States rolling out a trillion dollar nuclear weapons modernization plan, signed by your guy, with the Russians rolling out new and upgraded ICBM/s/Nukes, with NATO still engaged in surrounding Russia (with Spanish jets "accidentally" firing missiles towards Russia in NATO exercises), with the growing Anti-Russian rhetoric etc. etc. etc.

Who could possibly have any concern about how things could escalate?

You've got your finger on the pulse as always LibBot7.

Look at The Big Tuck/LibBot7 trying to work together here.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7487 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:33:27 AM »

Yeah, who could have predicted an "anti-russian" sentiment after we caught them dicking around in our elections? Like you said earlier, it's not even a big deal so why do people even care? Russian nukes inc

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7488 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:36:51 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 11:33:27 AM

Yeah, who could have predicted an "anti-russian" sentiment after we caught them dicking around in our elections? Like you said earlier, it's not even a big deal so why do people even care? Russian nukes inc

LOL, posted like the simpleton we've always known you were, LibBot7.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7489 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:40:27 AM »

Dax having flashbacks from his youth?

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7490 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:42:30 AM »

Is it time to rummage around for some of those "John Bolton is gonna get us in a nuclear war" posts?

Good to see you're trying to play both sides of the fence as usual LibBot7.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7491 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:44:37 AM »

Now dax loves bolton, wow, it really is one of those "bad" days

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7492 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:45:48 AM »

Quote from: libliblibliblibliblib on August 28, 2018, 11:44:37 AM

Now dax loves bolton, wow, it really is one of those "bad" days

LOL, no.

Just admit you're all

because as usual, you didn't understand what the article was actually saying. You're

and when you get

you get all

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7493 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:50:31 AM »

https://twitter.com/RepMarkMeadows/status/1034264442786246656

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7494 on:** August 28, 2018, 11:52:38 AM »

Can't wait to hear this NEW information

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7495 on:** August 28, 2018, 12:13:08 PM »

Quote

To meet this new challenge, first, their equipment must catch up.

A RAND Corporation official earlier this year noted that Russian cannons have 50 percent to 100 percent greater range than current U.S. cannons.

Trillion dollar sign off on new nukes by "their guy", NATO forces ever closer to Russia, arms to the Ukraine, a new white hot conventional arms race.

No doubt the New NeoCon has gone from 9 to full midnight as we've got to fight those meddling Russians on the beaches, streets and hills.

https://www.armytimes.com/news/your-army/2018/08/27/return-of-fires-how-the-army-is-getting-back-to-its-big-guns-as-it-prepares-for-the-near-peer-fight/

Great times for you guys, but still not satisfied that we've got enough military-industrial-intelligence stuff going on at nearly $1 trillion a year.

What's next, implicit trust in all findings from the once hated RAND corporation?

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7496 on:** August 28, 2018, 12:38:36 PM »

Devin Nunes :

2017/2018 Unitemized individual contributions = $1,923,418.03

2015/16 Unitemized individual con = $25,038.01

2013/14 Unitemized ?individual con = $21,008.79

Hmmm......

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7497 on:** August 28, 2018, 12:39:56 PM »

Appreciate the new and highly selective awareness of campaign contributions, LibBot7.

star seed 7 · « **Reply #7498 on:** August 28, 2018, 01:04:22 PM »

https://twitter.com/perlberg/status/1034246868228820992

Giant dumbass

sonofdaxjones · « **Reply #7499 on:** August 28, 2018, 01:09:46 PM »

Oh look, known Clinton slug/crony Lanny Davis is being a slug (no one is surprised).