Nothing but the same ol same ol from edn.
Walks in days late, then doesn't approve the sources.
Nothing to see here, as usual.
Maybe I'd approve of the Caller if Tucker bought me whores. 
But great job still flailing because you can't find one legit news source that practices any kind of journalistic integrity to base your bullshit on.
Enraged tap out noted and accepted. It's laughable how you think you can decide what does or doesn't have "journalistic integrity".
But let's continue. So what's you're point of contention Whackadoo? The Steele Report doesn't exist? That the Steele Report doesn't reference "unnamed" Kremlin sources? The Steele Report was or was not sanctioned by Democrats? That Democrats (never Trumpers like McCain) didn't float the Steele report to the NYT's (and others) and that it isn't in front of the FBI?
Again, you walk in with you're usual bullshit wanting to rehash crap that was discussed pages ago.
It's hilarious that you can't even defend your positions and try and turn this into a referendum on the person pointing out your crazy (the simple facts are we have discussed this at length. Now are you going to answer the questions or not?). You made a claim. You failed to back it up with anything but alt right trash that has been well known to fabricate stories even going as far as paying whores to make it happen. But yeah, I'm the one with issues with the truth and sound reasoning (Then why are your fellow libs trying to say this is not the same, why is Fusion GPS the subject of Senate Hearings this week? Did you even bother to read the Grassley letter to the Intelligence committee that I posted? )
Why don't you see if our J school has a journalism 101 you can take online to find out what integrity in journalism actually means. Might be pretty eye opening (oh wait your tribe things colleges and universities can't be trusted now). (LOL, anything less then your own self affirming sources is you deem not legitimate, it's the typical edn bullshit tactic).
And yeah, I'll let Bucket dick all over you about the false comparison between treason and working with our enemies and working with our allies. (It's good to see you sanction political parties using foreign governments to smear political opposition, nothing short of a Banana Republic for you, congrats).
rage post
Still understand what the difference is between integrity and agreement can you?
Again, we don't need hearings for a party getting info from an independent 3rd party commissioned to gather information. We have SPECIFIC parts of our constitution that deal with people collaborating with foreign enemies. We have specific laws passed by our founders that say you can't work with foreign governments. You are trying to direct all the attention to something else that is totally meaningless, away from arguably treason. When questioned why you can't stay on topic you flail and rant like a small child upset you aren't getting your way.
Do you agree Russia is a hostile foreign power?
Do you agree Trump's team had meetings with a hostile foreign power?
Do you know what the content of those meetings were? Because right now the coverup and the slow leaks suggests it was bad and directly on point to affect the election with Russian information, as admitted by Trump's team.
