0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Dlew12 on December 28, 2015, 01:39:42 PM do you understand why they're upset, but you disagree with how they're going about voicing their anger? yesYou might not have been personally inconvenienced, but a lot of business owners were.http://www.chicagotribune.com/business/ct-black-friday-mag-mile-fallout-1201-biz-20151130-story.htmlI would like to see changes in police training and how the justice system handles cops who murder people, but I don't see how worsening your local economy helps things. It's very difficult for me to read that article and support BLM.
do you understand why they're upset, but you disagree with how they're going about voicing their anger?
I would like to see changes in police training and how the justice system handles cops who murder people, but I don't see how worsening your local economy helps things.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 01:52:14 PMI would like to see changes in police training and how the justice system handles cops who murder people, but I don't see how worsening your local economy helps things. People affected by a hurt "local economy" (ie people with money) are people who really can influence change. Even if they're just like, "hey mayor, these BLM folks are hurting my business, make them stop", it's a win for BLM, because otherwise no one gives two shits about them.
Quote from: lopakman on December 27, 2015, 04:03:29 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. If black people know black on black crime is a problem then why don't they stop it instead of just blaming and white people for their problems? "Hey bro, did you know our lives matter? Yes bro, now let's shoot each other" I'm baffled you refuse to accept any accountability, but youre a racist and an idiot so I guess I shouldn't be surprisedI literally addressed your point in that paragraph but you're too stupid to understand. The irony of you calling me an idiot is rich. Also you say I refuse to accept responsibility, what do I need to accept responsibility for, and who did I blame for anything?I need someone to also explain to me why this makes cat27 and lopakman so blind with rage where they have to call me names? The BLM movement has little to no effect on my day-to-day life, I can't imagine how it does for these people. I can't imagine being so angry about something that has no effect on me that I rage out on strangers.Some of you people that has met this dude in irl, let me know when he gets arrested for harming someone, it's coming.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. If black people know black on black crime is a problem then why don't they stop it instead of just blaming and white people for their problems? "Hey bro, did you know our lives matter? Yes bro, now let's shoot each other" I'm baffled you refuse to accept any accountability, but youre a racist and an idiot so I guess I shouldn't be surprised
Black Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 06:15:31 PMQuote from: lopakman on December 27, 2015, 04:03:29 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. If black people know black on black crime is a problem then why don't they stop it instead of just blaming and white people for their problems? "Hey bro, did you know our lives matter? Yes bro, now let's shoot each other" I'm baffled you refuse to accept any accountability, but youre a racist and an idiot so I guess I shouldn't be surprisedI literally addressed your point in that paragraph but you're too stupid to understand. The irony of you calling me an idiot is rich. Also you say I refuse to accept responsibility, what do I need to accept responsibility for, and who did I blame for anything?I need someone to also explain to me why this makes cat27 and lopakman so blind with rage where they have to call me names? The BLM movement has little to no effect on my day-to-day life, I can't imagine how it does for these people. I can't imagine being so angry about something that has no effect on me that I rage out on strangers.Some of you people that has met this dude in irl, let me know when he gets arrested for harming someone, it's coming. The guy who starts a 'real life fighting you thread' is worried about my rage and me harming someone. That's pure gold right there.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 28, 2015, 01:12:15 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 11:21:28 AMI think a major difference between the recent BLM protests and older civil rights protests is that the older protests were directed at oppressors and these protests are not. The image portrayed by a group of people getting beaten, spit on, etc for having the nerve to expect to get served at a restaurant or ride in the front of a bus is far more effective than the image portrayed by a bunch of assholes blocking an airport so people who have absolutely nothing to do with them miss Christmas dinner.Completely disregarding the sit-ins. The first Selma-to-Montgomery march on a major highway, in historical retrospect was the seminal moment in the 60's civil rights movement.The Selma-to-Montgomery march ended at the Alabama State House. The protest was about voting rights and it was directed at at those responsible.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 11:21:28 AMI think a major difference between the recent BLM protests and older civil rights protests is that the older protests were directed at oppressors and these protests are not. The image portrayed by a group of people getting beaten, spit on, etc for having the nerve to expect to get served at a restaurant or ride in the front of a bus is far more effective than the image portrayed by a bunch of assholes blocking an airport so people who have absolutely nothing to do with them miss Christmas dinner.Completely disregarding the sit-ins. The first Selma-to-Montgomery march on a major highway, in historical retrospect was the seminal moment in the 60's civil rights movement.
I think a major difference between the recent BLM protests and older civil rights protests is that the older protests were directed at oppressors and these protests are not. The image portrayed by a group of people getting beaten, spit on, etc for having the nerve to expect to get served at a restaurant or ride in the front of a bus is far more effective than the image portrayed by a bunch of assholes blocking an airport so people who have absolutely nothing to do with them miss Christmas dinner.
People affected by a hurt "local economy" (ie people with money) ...
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 01:32:56 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 28, 2015, 01:12:15 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 11:21:28 AMI think a major difference between the recent BLM protests and older civil rights protests is that the older protests were directed at oppressors and these protests are not. The image portrayed by a group of people getting beaten, spit on, etc for having the nerve to expect to get served at a restaurant or ride in the front of a bus is far more effective than the image portrayed by a bunch of assholes blocking an airport so people who have absolutely nothing to do with them miss Christmas dinner.Completely disregarding the sit-ins. The first Selma-to-Montgomery march on a major highway, in historical retrospect was the seminal moment in the 60's civil rights movement.The Selma-to-Montgomery march ended at the Alabama State House. The protest was about voting rights and it was directed at at those responsible.I'm guessing the lawmakers in the state house that day weren't the ones who had their driving routes inconvenienced.
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 28, 2015, 03:06:20 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 01:32:56 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 28, 2015, 01:12:15 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on December 28, 2015, 11:21:28 AMI think a major difference between the recent BLM protests and older civil rights protests is that the older protests were directed at oppressors and these protests are not. The image portrayed by a group of people getting beaten, spit on, etc for having the nerve to expect to get served at a restaurant or ride in the front of a bus is far more effective than the image portrayed by a bunch of assholes blocking an airport so people who have absolutely nothing to do with them miss Christmas dinner.Completely disregarding the sit-ins. The first Selma-to-Montgomery march on a major highway, in historical retrospect was the seminal moment in the 60's civil rights movement.The Selma-to-Montgomery march ended at the Alabama State House. The protest was about voting rights and it was directed at at those responsible.I'm guessing the lawmakers in the state house that day weren't the ones who had their driving routes inconvenienced.I don't think drivers having their routes inconvenienced had anything to do with the success of the march.
What matters in Cleveland:
Quote from: michigancat on December 28, 2015, 02:11:17 PMPeople affected by a hurt "local economy" (ie people with money) ...The ignorance is palpable.
Black Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. Here is the most egregious case of black life being marginalized that I've ever seen. I don't know if I'm more pissed that it happened or that no one seems to care that it did, business as usual.http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/autopsy-results-expected-woman-removed-hospital-35922002
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. Here is the most egregious case of black life being marginalized that I've ever seen. I don't know if I'm more pissed that it happened or that no one seems to care that it did, business as usual.http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/autopsy-results-expected-woman-removed-hospital-35922002I would agree with you on the assumption that the cops and all of the hospital staff were white. Seems like a racist assumption, but if that is what you are going with, then I am on board. Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
Quote from: slobber on December 28, 2015, 11:09:55 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. Here is the most egregious case of black life being marginalized that I've ever seen. I don't know if I'm more pissed that it happened or that no one seems to care that it did, business as usual.http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/autopsy-results-expected-woman-removed-hospital-35922002I would agree with you on the assumption that the cops and all of the hospital staff were white. Seems like a racist assumption, but if that is what you are going with, then I am on board. Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)What does their race have to do with what I posted there? For the record that county in Florida is 80% white, so it's a fairly safe assumption but I need you to tell me what that has to do with what you responded to?
Quote from: MakeItRain on December 28, 2015, 11:22:30 PMQuote from: slobber on December 28, 2015, 11:09:55 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. Here is the most egregious case of black life being marginalized that I've ever seen. I don't know if I'm more pissed that it happened or that no one seems to care that it did, business as usual.http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/autopsy-results-expected-woman-removed-hospital-35922002I would agree with you on the assumption that the cops and all of the hospital staff were white. Seems like a racist assumption, but if that is what you are going with, then I am on board. Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)What does their race have to do with what I posted there? For the record that county in Florida is 80% white, so it's a fairly safe assumption but I need you to tell me what that has to do with what you responded to?I guess it was a reach for me that when "a black life was marginalized" that it was being marginalized by whites. My mistake. Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)
the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others
Slobberknocked
Quote from: slobber on December 28, 2015, 11:34:16 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 28, 2015, 11:22:30 PMQuote from: slobber on December 28, 2015, 11:09:55 PMQuote from: MakeItRain on December 27, 2015, 10:30:18 AMBlack Lives Matter is ultimately necessary because, as I've pointed out before, the entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value others. I'm baffled by those of you who continue to whine about black-on-black crime, as if you actually care, like black people don't know it's a problem. Black lives mattering like that of livestock is deeply rooted in this country, the BLM movement is a noble one but I'm not sure how it will reverse 400 years of history. And it seems like on the whole white America refuses to acknowledge this so it seems this is all futile. Here is the most egregious case of black life being marginalized that I've ever seen. I don't know if I'm more pissed that it happened or that no one seems to care that it did, business as usual.http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/autopsy-results-expected-woman-removed-hospital-35922002I would agree with you on the assumption that the cops and all of the hospital staff were white. Seems like a racist assumption, but if that is what you are going with, then I am on board. Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)What does their race have to do with what I posted there? For the record that county in Florida is 80% white, so it's a fairly safe assumption but I need you to tell me what that has to do with what you responded to?I guess it was a reach for me that when "a black life was marginalized" that it was being marginalized by whites. My mistake. Gonna win 'em all! (using Tapatalk)Yeah, you're right it was your mistake. The very first sentence I typed in that post you quoted saidQuotethe entirety of our society doesn't value the lives of black people the way we value othersSo I have to think that either you are a poor reader or you don't consider black people as a part of our society. Which is it?