Author Topic: Marco Rubio Master Thread  (Read 75926 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16224
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #650 on: February 23, 2016, 08:39:38 AM »
Great stuff yard dog

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #651 on: February 23, 2016, 08:41:03 AM »
So, Trump voters all of the sudden stop voting for Trump once the non-Trump voters get their crap together? Doesn't seem very likely.

Trump voters won't stop voting for Trump, they will just no longer be the majority. There is a lot of talk about his polling percentage ceiling. He has very rarely polled above 40% close to an actual vote in a state and hasn't gotten above 35% in any of the final voting. To think his numbers will jump when other candidates drop out isn't looking at the facts.

Correct. This sounds strange to say for the "front runner," but Trump's only path to victory is if the vote against him stays divided long enough for him to capture a majority of the delegates.

Bernie supporters hate Trump.

The ones who are far left conservatives probably do, but it is shocking how many people I have heard interviewed that have mentioned that Bernie and Trump were their top two options.

Yes, there are a lot of very stupid people in this country. These are the people voting purely out of frustration as opposed to knowing anything about candidates' positions, basic economics, etc. The good news is that many of these people don't actually vote - but way too many do.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #652 on: February 23, 2016, 08:58:19 AM »
So, Trump voters all of the sudden stop voting for Trump once the non-Trump voters get their crap together? Doesn't seem very likely.

Trump voters won't stop voting for Trump, they will just no longer be the majority. There is a lot of talk about his polling percentage ceiling. He has very rarely polled above 40% close to an actual vote in a state and hasn't gotten above 35% in any of the final voting. To think his numbers will jump when other candidates drop out isn't looking at the facts.

Correct. This sounds strange to say for the "front runner," but Trump's only path to victory is if the vote against him stays divided long enough for him to capture a majority of the delegates.

Bernie supporters hate Trump.

The ones who are far left conservatives probably do, but it is shocking how many people I have heard interviewed that have mentioned that Bernie and Trump were their top two options.

Yes, there are a lot of very stupid people in this country. These are the people voting purely out of frustration as opposed to knowing anything about candidates' positions, basic economics, etc. The good news is that many of these people don't actually vote - but way too many do.

And yet Trump somehow just pulled at 50% in Mass.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #653 on: February 23, 2016, 09:00:01 AM »
Bernie supporters hate Trump.

The ones who are far left conservatives probably do, but it is shocking how many people I have heard interviewed that have mentioned that Bernie and Trump were their top two options.

Yes, there are a lot of very stupid people in this country. These are the people voting purely out of frustration as opposed to knowing anything about candidates' positions, basic economics, etc. The good news is that many of these people don't actually vote - but way too many do.

I was listening to NPR's coverage of the SC primary and they interviewed a Trump supporter. He said one of the reasons he was voting Trump was because he thought the minimum wage was too low and needed to be raised. They clarified after the interview that Trump has no intentions of raising the minimum wage. :facepalm:

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #654 on: February 23, 2016, 09:02:27 AM »
And yet Trump somehow just pulled at 50% in Mass.

Yeah, a state that only has 42 delegates that are divided proportionally with only a 5% threshold to receive delegates.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #655 on: February 23, 2016, 09:03:08 AM »
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Trump pushed for a minimum wage increase during the first year of his presidency.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #656 on: February 23, 2016, 09:05:30 AM »
And yet Trump somehow just pulled at 50% in Mass.

Yeah, a state that only has 42 delegates that are divided proportionally with only a 5% threshold to receive delegates.

It more just shows that Trump is going to crush in the Blue states as this article postulates.

http://www.theamericanconservative.com/larison/trump-and-blue-state-republicans/

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38088
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #657 on: February 23, 2016, 09:07:48 AM »
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Trump pushed for a minimum wage increase during the first year of his presidency.

Only after his construction co builds the wall, though.

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #658 on: February 23, 2016, 09:18:06 AM »
I love the fantasy that people have that something drastic is going to change on March 15, and people are going to come out in droves to vote for Marco Rubio all of the sudden. Marco most likely had his chance to really gain momentum in New Hampshire. He didnt, its probably too late now.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32522
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #659 on: February 23, 2016, 09:21:23 AM »
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Trump pushed for a minimum wage increase during the first year of his presidency.


Do you not pay attention?  He said he is going to make Mexico pay for it.

Only after his construction co builds the wall, though.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #660 on: February 23, 2016, 09:27:16 AM »
Poll in Ohio which is already early voting. Tell me again why everyone not named Rubio should drop out?


https://twitter.com/stevenportnoy/status/702089575225753600

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #661 on: February 23, 2016, 09:36:29 AM »
Poll in Ohio which is already early voting. Tell me again why everyone not named Rubio should drop out?


https://twitter.com/stevenportnoy/status/702089575225753600

Honestly it is because sensible conservatives are looking to the general election. Trump, Cruz, and Kasich supporters fail to see the difficulty they will have winning votes in the GE. Both Trump and Cruz will have a very difficult time pulling independents, and Trump will not pull the minority vote.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22453
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #662 on: February 23, 2016, 09:39:30 AM »
So, Trump voters all of the sudden stop voting for Trump once the non-Trump voters get their crap together? Doesn't seem very likely.

Trump voters won't stop voting for Trump, they will just no longer be the majority. There is a lot of talk about his polling percentage ceiling. He has very rarely polled above 40% close to an actual vote in a state and hasn't gotten above 35% in any of the final voting. To think his numbers will jump when other candidates drop out isn't looking at the facts.

Correct. This sounds strange to say for the "front runner," but Trump's only path to victory is if the vote against him stays divided long enough for him to capture a majority of the delegates.

The only way this could happen is if all states were winner take all. They're not. Not even close. As long as the party doesn't eff him over, Trump pretty much has this in the bag.

http://www.electionprojection.com/republican-nomination-delegates/

Offline chuckjames

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 858
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #663 on: February 23, 2016, 09:40:13 AM »
Poll in Ohio which is already early voting. Tell me again why everyone not named Rubio should drop out?


https://twitter.com/stevenportnoy/status/702089575225753600

Honestly it is because sensible conservatives are looking to the general election. Trump, Cruz, and Kasich supporters fail to see the difficulty they will have winning votes in the GE. Both Trump and Cruz will have a very difficult time pulling independents, and Trump will not pull the minority vote.

So basically you're saying Rubio should have the nomination given to him. Man I thought conservatives were about hard work and stuff.

Also Kasich would be a great a GE candidate, probably better than Rubio.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15574
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #664 on: February 23, 2016, 09:42:51 AM »
Poll in Ohio which is already early voting. Tell me again why everyone not named Rubio should drop out?


https://twitter.com/stevenportnoy/status/702089575225753600

Honestly it is because sensible conservatives are looking to the general election. Trump, Cruz, and Kasich supporters fail to see the difficulty they will have winning votes in the GE. Both Trump and Cruz will have a very difficult time pulling independents, and Trump will not pull the minority vote.

So basically you're saying Rubio should have the nomination given to him. Man I thought conservatives were about hard work and stuff.

Also Kasich would be a great a GE candidate, probably better than Rubio.

Maybe not.  http://www.salon.com/2016/02/23/samantha_bee_just_ended_the_john_kasich_charade_in_the_nauseating_bus_terminal_restroom_that_is_the_republican_primary_kasich_initially_seems_like_the_least_disgusting_stall/

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38088
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #665 on: February 23, 2016, 10:00:14 AM »
I wouldn't be surprised at all if Trump pushed for a minimum wage increase during the first year of his presidency.


Do you not pay attention?  He said he is going to make Mexico pay for it.

Only after his construction co builds the wall, though.

Yes, pay for it, not build it.  I mean, he is going to want to turn a huge profit, not share it with his workers.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #666 on: February 23, 2016, 10:21:05 AM »
Poll in Ohio which is already early voting. Tell me again why everyone not named Rubio should drop out?


https://twitter.com/stevenportnoy/status/702089575225753600

Honestly it is because sensible conservatives are looking to the general election. Trump, Cruz, and Kasich supporters fail to see the difficulty they will have winning votes in the GE. Both Trump and Cruz will have a very difficult time pulling independents, and Trump will not pull the minority vote.

So basically you're saying Rubio should have the nomination given to him. Man I thought conservatives were about hard work and stuff.

Also Kasich would be a great a GE candidate, probably better than Rubio.

Maybe not.  http://www.salon.com/2016/02/23/samantha_bee_just_ended_the_john_kasich_charade_in_the_nauseating_bus_terminal_restroom_that_is_the_republican_primary_kasich_initially_seems_like_the_least_disgusting_stall/

I didn't think it was a secret that Kasich is pro life.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 18075
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #667 on: February 23, 2016, 10:46:45 AM »
Looking at polls, Kasich is likely out soon.  He isn't consistent enough to unseat Rubio as establishment guy.  Carson/Cruz aren't going anywhere because they don't give a crap about what the party wants.  Carson will either have to start winning or run out of money though. 

People that think Rubio is in trouble don't understand the Republican's unpledged delegates.  With those all likely to go with the establishment guy, current counts are basically:

Trump: 67
Rubio: 447
Cruz: 11

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38088
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #668 on: February 23, 2016, 10:47:48 AM »
Looking at polls, Kasich is likely out soon.  He isn't consistent enough to unseat Rubio as establishment guy.  Carson/Cruz aren't going anywhere because they don't give a crap about what the party wants.  Carson will either have to start winning or run out of money though. 

People that think Rubio is in trouble don't understand the Republican's unpledged delegates.  With those all likely to go with the establishment guy, current counts are basically:

Trump: 67
Rubio: 447
Cruz: 11

The Trump as an R thing has been great, but Trump as an I will be amazing.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #669 on: February 23, 2016, 10:53:14 AM »
even with the pub unpledgeds, rubio is going to have to cut a deal to get a majority.  either a deal to get people to dropout or a deal to take their delegates after the voting is done.  neither kasich nor cruz has any reason to just bow out for nothing.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #670 on: February 23, 2016, 10:54:39 AM »
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32522
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #671 on: February 23, 2016, 11:21:51 AM »
Why is Marco Rubio so broke? That kind of bothers me.  Maybe he isn't as fiscally responsible as I was lead to believe.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22453
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #672 on: February 23, 2016, 11:31:09 AM »
Looks like Romney got 35% of unpledged delegates in 2012.

http://www.thegreenpapers.com/P12/R-PU.phtml

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38010
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #673 on: February 23, 2016, 01:45:10 PM »
Why is Marco Rubio so broke? That kind of bothers me.  Maybe he isn't as fiscally responsible as I was lead to believe.

He enjoys the glamorous lifestyle.

Offline Yard Dog

  • Baller on a Budget
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2468
  • I am DC Cat
    • View Profile
Re: Marco Rubio Master Thread
« Reply #674 on: February 23, 2016, 03:57:16 PM »
Why is Marco Rubio so broke? That kind of bothers me.  Maybe he isn't as fiscally responsible as I was lead to believe.

Because ad buying is extremely expensive.