Between neck and dude at Auburn, what is it about coaches at ISU failing that makes them attractive to other schools? I fear it's that other schools view ISU as a place that you can't win at. Hope I'm wrong Havehills. 
Creighton bball isn't exactly Auburn fball, d00d.
I realize it stings a little more to have Creighton poach your coach vs Auburn, but the point still remains: They sucked at ISU, yet other schools think it could work out for them. The only logic behind that is if, at a minimum, Auburn and Creighton think that they are good coaches, but it's just too hard to win at ISU.
Mac had Valley success, but couldn't get bigger, better players to compete and fight for him. Coaches can win at Iowa State, and suggesting otherwise is stupid. Using that logic, winning is also impossible at Kansas State as well.
Mac isn't exactly a good motivator. His only motivation to win at KSU this year was because he hates the Wabash Cannonball song at the end of games.