I don't know how that's possible since people of color can't be racist.
Personally, I think that's a pretty big leap that requires some manipulation of the definition of "racist". Are you claiming that one has to be in the majority to be a racist? I'm not trying to argue here... Just trying to understand exactly where you're drawing the line.
Dictionaries define the word "racism" as follows:
The Oxford English Dictionary defines racism as the "belief that all members of each race possess characteristics, abilities, or qualities specific to that race, especially so as to distinguish it as inferior or superior to another race or races" and the expression of such prejudice,
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary defines it as a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority or inferiority of a particular racial group, and alternatively that it is also the prejudice based on such a belief.
The Macquarie Dictionary defines racism as: "the belief that human races have distinctive characteristics which determine their respective cultures, usually involving the idea that one's own race is superior and has the right to rule or dominate others."
You'll get no argument from me that what the SAE's at OU did was "racist". However, with that said, I also saw a great deal of backlash and statements made by people of color over the past two days that I would consider as blatantly racist toward Caucasians as a whole... Perhaps there's a loophole in the definition that I'm missing and it doesn't fall into "racism" so much as extreme segregational, xenophobic prejudice.
Do I have to be hurt by their stupidity for it to be racist? Or where exactly is that line drawn? Surely you can see that there are people on both sides of the racial battle that are wholly and unabashedly wrong in their beliefs and actions.