Author Topic: burn. it. down  (Read 23112 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #25 on: March 21, 2014, 11:22:11 PM »
So far no NIT's for oscar and a trophy of significance. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45919
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #26 on: March 21, 2014, 11:22:30 PM »
Frank's seniors exit with a 3 for 16 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep clearly Frank's fault, add the last two tournaments to all of the times that loser Frank lost in the round of 64

Frank and oscar can both get mumped. They're proving just how terrible they both are. Without Hill recruiting and Brad drawing up X and Os Frank is worthless.

lol, okay

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #27 on: March 21, 2014, 11:23:19 PM »
Frank's seniors exit with a 3 for 16 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep clearly Frank's fault, add the last two tournaments to all of the times that loser Frank lost in the round of 64

Frank and oscar can both get mumped. They're proving just how terrible they both are. Without Hill recruiting and Brad drawing up X and Os Frank is worthless.

lol, okay

I love how you love to think you are so smart but you really aren't. It's cute.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #28 on: March 21, 2014, 11:23:26 PM »
Frankites will never accept that Unds bailed out Frank.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22430
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #29 on: March 21, 2014, 11:25:30 PM »
What proven or talented  players are we adding next year?

Look them up.  It will be interesting.  Plus, the freshman will be better.

There is no talent or proven players.  And the freshmen don't have to get better.  The seniors didn't.

So, you're not going to look them up?

Offline tadowdaddy1

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 8
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #30 on: March 21, 2014, 11:27:59 PM »
can we all just agree we should've hired brad two years ago?

Agreed, but I'm interested to see what awful oscar does with these transfers..........

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59282
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #31 on: March 21, 2014, 11:29:36 PM »
Check that, Frank recruiting exits with a 4 for 19 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #32 on: March 21, 2014, 11:30:11 PM »
can we all just agree we should've hired brad two years ago?

Agreed, but I'm interested to see what awful oscar does with these transfers..........

Well if you go off of his track record he will win games against shitty and average teams and get no wins of any significance.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22430
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #33 on: March 21, 2014, 11:33:45 PM »
We only use historical performace when it supports our predetermined conclusions.  And then we do so dogmatically.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45919
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #34 on: March 21, 2014, 11:34:21 PM »
Frank's seniors exit with a 3 for 16 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep clearly Frank's fault, add the last two tournaments to all of the times that loser Frank lost in the round of 64

Frank and oscar can both get mumped. They're proving just how terrible they both are. Without Hill recruiting and Brad drawing up X and Os Frank is worthless.

lol, okay

I love how you love to think you are so smart but you really aren't. It's cute.

I'm sure you'll have no issue explaining to us what X's & O's Brad taught Frank that he didn't know before.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #35 on: March 21, 2014, 11:37:17 PM »
We only use historical performace when it supports our predetermined conclusions.  And then we do so dogmatically.

Um. rough ridin' duh? Predetermined conclusions are generally based on historical performances. Jesus christ.  :facepalm:
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22430
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #36 on: March 21, 2014, 11:38:57 PM »
We only use historical performace when it supports our predetermined conclusions.  And then we do so dogmatically.

Um. rough ridin' duh? Predetermined conclusions are generally based on historical performances. Jesus christ.  :facepalm:

No, they wouldn't be predetermined in that case.

Offline Cire

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20618
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #37 on: March 21, 2014, 11:42:00 PM »
THIS ISN'T ABOUT EFFING FRANK

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #38 on: March 21, 2014, 11:43:08 PM »
What proven or talented  players are we adding next year?

Look them up.  It will be interesting.  Plus, the freshman will be better.

There is no talent or proven players.  And the freshmen don't have to get better.  The seniors didn't.

So, you're not going to look them up?

I did. no talent. not proven. 

Offline Boondock Poonhound

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 434
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #39 on: March 21, 2014, 11:43:17 PM »
Frankites will never accept that Unds bailed out Frank.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Frankites will never accept that Unds bailed from Frank.
"He's in Shape !"

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #40 on: March 21, 2014, 11:44:34 PM »
Frank's seniors exit with a 3 for 16 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep clearly Frank's fault, add the last two tournaments to all of the times that loser Frank lost in the round of 64

Frank and oscar can both get mumped. They're proving just how terrible they both are. Without Hill recruiting and Brad drawing up X and Os Frank is worthless.

lol, okay

I love how you love to think you are so smart but you really aren't. It's cute.

I'm sure you'll have no issue explaining to us what X's & O's Brad taught Frank that he didn't know before.
Are you really trying to debate that it wasn't Brad's offense we were running for a year and a half when Frank's was a dreadful failure?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #41 on: March 21, 2014, 11:44:38 PM »
We only use historical performace when it supports our predetermined conclusions.  And then we do so dogmatically.

Um. rough ridin' duh? Predetermined conclusions are generally based on historical performances. Jesus christ.  :facepalm:

No, they wouldn't be predetermined in that case.

You either just said something incredibly stupid or blew my mind. I'm too drunk to determine right now.
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline MixBerryCrunch

  • Señor Vol
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3745
  • Anybody want a peanut?
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #42 on: March 21, 2014, 11:45:43 PM »
Frankites will never accept that Unds bailed out Frank.   


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Frankites will never accept that Unds bailed from Frank.

If that's the case can anyone blame him for wanting to shake the deadweight?
Hello, my name is Inigo Montoya. You killed my father. Prepare to die.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45919
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #43 on: March 21, 2014, 11:46:43 PM »
lol at oscar blaming three officials for Vulture's T

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #44 on: March 21, 2014, 11:48:17 PM »
lol at oscar blaming three officials for Vulture's T

he had an entire game to get after the officials (like when it might count) and he spends the post game to do it.

Online chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 22430
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #45 on: March 21, 2014, 11:48:42 PM »
What proven or talented  players are we adding next year?

Look them up.  It will be interesting.  Plus, the freshman will be better.

There is no talent or proven players.  And the freshmen don't have to get better.  The seniors didn't.

So, you're not going to look them up?

I did. no talent. not proven.

The proven requirement sounds really dumb for newcomers.  Like, should we limit ourselves to all-conference transfers?  If so, we'd have no players.  Well, outside of Edwards, I guess.  The talent requirement is both dumb and vague.  Try to define it and you'll see what I mean.

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #46 on: March 21, 2014, 11:49:22 PM »
What proven or talented  players are we adding next year?

Look them up.  It will be interesting.  Plus, the freshman will be better.

There is no talent or proven players.  And the freshmen don't have to get better.  The seniors didn't.

So, you're not going to look them up?

I did. no talent. not proven.

The proven requirement sounds really dumb for newcomers.  Like, should we limit ourselves to all-conference transfers?  If so, we'd have no players.  Well, outside of Edwards, I guess.  The talent requirement is both dumb and vague.  Try to define it and you'll see what I mean.

the transfers aren't proven you rough ridin' dumbass.  and it's not a crazy assertion, it's valid, whether it is attained is not the point.  you're going to get better from one season to the next because you added one or the other (talent or a proven player, they can be both).  we are adding neither.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45919
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #47 on: March 21, 2014, 11:50:21 PM »
Frank's seniors exit with a 3 for 16 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep clearly Frank's fault, add the last two tournaments to all of the times that loser Frank lost in the round of 64

Frank and oscar can both get mumped. They're proving just how terrible they both are. Without Hill recruiting and Brad drawing up X and Os Frank is worthless.

lol, okay

I love how you love to think you are so smart but you really aren't. It's cute.

I'm sure you'll have no issue explaining to us what X's & O's Brad taught Frank that he didn't know before.
Are you really trying to debate that it wasn't Brad's offense we were running for a year and a half when Frank's was a dreadful failure?

yeah, everything in your sentence I take exception to, it's all wrong and a gross misunderstanding of basketball

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #48 on: March 21, 2014, 11:53:11 PM »
Frank's seniors exit with a 3 for 16 effort. 


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

yep clearly Frank's fault, add the last two tournaments to all of the times that loser Frank lost in the round of 64

Frank and oscar can both get mumped. They're proving just how terrible they both are. Without Hill recruiting and Brad drawing up X and Os Frank is worthless.

lol, okay

I love how you love to think you are so smart but you really aren't. It's cute.

I'm sure you'll have no issue explaining to us what X's & O's Brad taught Frank that he didn't know before.
Are you really trying to debate that it wasn't Brad's offense we were running for a year and a half when Frank's was a dreadful failure?

yeah, everything in your sentence I take exception to, it's all wrong and a gross misunderstanding of basketball

So yeah, MiR wrong once again, called out, and makes up bullshit reason to deflect.  Pretty much rinse and repeat the usual bull when you're wrong.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Re: burn. it. down
« Reply #49 on: March 21, 2014, 11:54:04 PM »
Jesus, We Have A Lot Of Tards On This Board.