0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Benja on May 04, 2014, 08:26:14 PMThere are a couple things that are really dumb to do when arguing with beems on the internet.1) Make fun of him for being on a rivals message board (who cares?)2) Say weird personal things3) Suck at bbs'inghe's fine, but terrible at thinking with a neutral mind.
There are a couple things that are really dumb to do when arguing with beems on the internet.1) Make fun of him for being on a rivals message board (who cares?)2) Say weird personal things3) Suck at bbs'ing
At this point I think the only question that needs answering is whether or not a single player on KU's roster would make the KSU 2-deep. Really the only player that comes to mind is Ben Heeney, but he got injured in the middle of last season and may have lost a step after that. Not sure if he will be fully recovered for next season or not. Something to keep an eye on. In the years when that number is zero I really feel extra sorry for KU because of TSC and all.
I think they have a good receiver and Brandon Bourbon might be pretty decent.
Quote from: Spracne on May 04, 2014, 01:34:16 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on May 04, 2014, 01:01:53 PMQuote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 11:36:38 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on May 03, 2014, 11:22:59 PMEverytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there? Revenue is more important for an athletic department. I'm genuinely embarrassed for you. If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.No charge.I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me. I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing. Don't be a funky-looking triangle...Honest question: Why is this whole "Revenue needs to be > Expenses" concept so hard for you guys?
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on May 04, 2014, 01:01:53 PMQuote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 11:36:38 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on May 03, 2014, 11:22:59 PMEverytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there? Revenue is more important for an athletic department. I'm genuinely embarrassed for you. If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.No charge.I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me. I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing. Don't be a funky-looking triangle...
Quote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 11:36:38 PMQuote from: Bookie Pimp on May 03, 2014, 11:22:59 PMEverytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there? Revenue is more important for an athletic department. I'm genuinely embarrassed for you. If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.No charge.
Quote from: Bookie Pimp on May 03, 2014, 11:22:59 PMEverytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there? Revenue is more important for an athletic department.
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?
I don't want my university spending $350-400M on a facility that's useful for maybe 30 hours per year.
QuoteI don't want my university spending $350-400M on a facility that's useful for maybe 30 hours per year.
KU is bigger and better than K-State in everything but football.
Quote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 06:48:55 PMKU is bigger and better than K-State in everything but football.Equestrian, tho.
Quote from: ydarg2012 on May 05, 2014, 10:57:18 AMQuote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 06:48:55 PMKU is bigger and better than K-State in everything but football.Equestrian, tho. And women's crew
Quote from: MouseRat on May 05, 2014, 10:02:44 PMQuote from: ydarg2012 on May 05, 2014, 10:57:18 AMQuote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 06:48:55 PMKU is bigger and better than K-State in everything but football.Equestrian, tho. And women's crewand judging the hell out of dirt
Quote from: Benja on May 05, 2014, 10:21:23 PMQuote from: MouseRat on May 05, 2014, 10:02:44 PMQuote from: ydarg2012 on May 05, 2014, 10:57:18 AMQuote from: OregonSmock on May 03, 2014, 06:48:55 PMKU is bigger and better than K-State in everything but football.Equestrian, tho. And women's crewand judging the hell out of dirtIf you can do something as tedious and meticulous as soil judging, just imagine what you could do in the corporate world.
Pepperjax34 wrote: These grapes are delusional if they think K-State is anything other than a dingleberry clinging to our nuts when it comes to realignment. No one wants a non-AAU program with a non-existent TV market.
din·gle·ber·ry?diNG?l?ber?/noun vulgar slangnoun: dingleberry; plural noun: dingleberries1.a particle of fecal matter attached to the anal hair of an animal.
He's raging again. I hope his wife hides all the knives and other weapons before she becomes another statistic of the Lawrence culture QuotePepperjax34 wrote: These grapes are delusional if they think K-State is anything other than a dingleberry clinging to our nuts when it comes to realignment. No one wants a non-AAU program with a non-existent TV market.
Quote from: #LIFE on May 06, 2014, 01:03:10 PMHe's raging again. I hope his wife hides all the knives and other weapons before she becomes another statistic of the Lawrence culture QuotePepperjax34 wrote: These grapes are delusional if they think K-State is anything other than a dingleberry clinging to our nuts when it comes to realignment. No one wants a non-AAU program with a non-existent TV market.They have dingleberries on their nuts? That's disgusting, take a shower for god's sake.
Quotedin·gle·ber·ry?diNG?l?ber?/noun vulgar slangnoun: dingleberry; plural noun: dingleberries1.a particle of fecal matter attached to the anal hair of an animal.On the nuts!?
K-State is like the rogue dingleberry that finds its way past the anal hair and latches onto the nut hair as its descending into the toilet. Essentially, you're Mountain West bound unless you can ride that nut hair into the big 10.