Author Topic: The KU Rayhawks are NOT going through a rough patch. They make Raytown, Missouri proud!  (Read 4050183 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
stop getting steamrolled by beems you idiots
so happy for him. Of course the people getting schooled don't even know it

I know what Beems is doing, I just don't get why.  Congrats Beems, you've put 100s of hours into your schtick to troll 10 people on a blog.  :dunno:

he isn't trolling. 

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59766
    • View Profile
If you can't tell the difference between when beems is trolling and when he's being trolled than you're not very smart.


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59766
    • View Profile
Wow, I just stand back in amazement about how Beems takes all the propaganda that comes out of ku and just runs with it.

It's an outright lie for any ku athletic department official to say they built $150 million dollars worth of facilities and only took on $49 million dollars in debt.  $49 million in debt is the current outstanding bond balance after nearly SEVEN years of paying for it.    ku took on over $60 million dollars worth of debt, nearly $70 million if you count the no interest loan they got for $6 million to complete the AFC.   Until the DeBruce Center, and the city/foundation/50 year lease con job, ku has borrowed money, lots of it, for every single significant facilities project they've done for the last 30 years.   They somehow conned the state into paying for the fire improvements at AFH back in the 90's which was absolutely absurd. 

7 years from now, K-State will have paid down on it's debt significantly and K-State currently has 2.5 to 3 years worth of annual debt payments sitting in cash reserves. 

Apparently he'll never get over the reality that FY2013 ku athletic revenue was an anomaly due to an accounting ploy that appears to be almost unprecedented in the college athletic world.   Take any major conference school, use 18 months worth of donations in a fiscal year annual report, and their total revenue is going to increase dramatically as well.   Of course beems will now come back and say that K-State did something similar.   That was not the case, K-State applied FASB 116 to donations given during a specific 12 month period, not 18 months like ku did.

pepperjax/smock/beems:  A ku propagandist-talking point.  Has never been more applicable than right now.  Which is saying something.

Sad, but true.


Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22895
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Wow, Dax is apparently an arc on the surface of the sun. #BeemsBurnsBright.
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

bears are fast...

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22895
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...

woof..  :facepalm:

take a lap spracne

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Quote
The funny thing is that K-State got worse after they improved their stadium. They were better when BSFS featured the 2nd-tiniest pressbox in the Big 12. Of course, the same is true for KU and our new football complex. All of this facilities talk just comes down to a d!ck measuring contest. At the end of the day, coaching and player development are much more important.

This talking point is so dumb. It's been one year Beems, and it was a rebuilding year.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59766
    • View Profile
Quote
The funny thing is that K-State got worse after they improved their stadium. They were better when BSFS featured the 2nd-tiniest pressbox in the Big 12. Of course, the same is true for KU and our new football complex. All of this facilities talk just comes down to a d!ck measuring contest. At the end of the day, coaching and player development are much more important.

This talking point is so dumb. It's been one year Beems, and it was a rebuilding year.

It's hilarious to read those comments now, knowing the propaganda that spewed from Beems keyboard back when he was on his "Lew is building a monster, K-State is in shambles" rampage.


Offline Jackstack99EMAW

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1355
    • View Profile
Quote
The funny thing is that K-State got worse after they improved their stadium. They were better when BSFS featured the 2nd-tiniest pressbox in the Big 12. Of course, the same is true for KU and our new football complex. All of this facilities talk just comes down to a d!ck measuring contest. At the end of the day, coaching and player development are much more important.

This talking point is so dumb. It's been one year Beems, and it was a rebuilding year.
Was he expecting us to win 11 games again after losing 10 defensive starters, heisman candidate, #1 WR, etc?

Offline MouseRat

  • Mall Santa/Amateur Surgeon
  • Point Plank'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 391
  • Pound £*#%ing sand!
    • View Profile
Quote
The funny thing is that K-State got worse after they improved their stadium. They were better when BSFS featured the 2nd-tiniest pressbox in the Big 12. Of course, the same is true for KU and our new football complex. All of this facilities talk just comes down to a d!ck measuring contest. At the end of the day, coaching and player development are much more important.

This talking point is so dumb. It's been one year Beems, and it was a rebuilding year.

Take it easy on KU.  Everyone knows it's a rebuilding decade.
I’ve started to kind of hate people, and it’s not because I have anything against them. It’s just, I enjoy it. It’s recreation.
-Louis C.K.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22895
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...

woof..  :facepalm:

take a lap spracne

Honestly, I couldn't be happier to have your disapproval, you funny-looking triangle, you...
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
Beems should take a break from the Internet. The three weeks I took off about 3 months ago was the best thing for me. "Why am I taking the Internet so serious? I'm being a complete dumbass on there!"-fanning inside thoughts

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Wait, are people trying to argue kuad is in a better position financially than ksuad? Because that is incredibly absurd.

Anyone who didn't flunk Fin450 (Ku obviously doesn't offer finance classes) can easily see that.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

The Big Train

  • Guest
well that was a very entertaining beems nuclear meltdown  :love:

Offline OregonSmock

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 8512
  • Mashing 'taters like an Old Country Buffet
    • View Profile

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...

Honest question:  Why is this whole "Revenue needs to be > Expenses" concept so hard for you guys?

 :dunno:
bears are fast...

Offline deputy dawg

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4211
  • Wait, wait....what?
    • View Profile
This discussion has devolved well beyond the basic point, that KU football is hurting.  The simple fact is that we have a coaching staff that takes winning very seriously, instills that in players, and puts a much better product on the field than KU.  KU has a coaching staff that is content with doing a half-ass job, and collecting paychecks well beyond what could be justified from the product THEY put on the field.  It's that simple.  I think the KU posters here see that, and agree, so why give them diversions like finances, stadium, etc.?  Seems kind of dumb of gE.
 :buh-bye:

Offline MouseRat

  • Mall Santa/Amateur Surgeon
  • Point Plank'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 391
  • Pound £*#%ing sand!
    • View Profile
Can we get a "case closed" here?
I’ve started to kind of hate people, and it’s not because I have anything against them. It’s just, I enjoy it. It’s recreation.
-Louis C.K.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22895
  • Gentleman | Polymath | Renowned Lover
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...

Honest question:  Why is this whole "Revenue needs to be > Expenses" concept so hard for you guys?

 :dunno:

You must spend that paper, that's the mandate, unless, of course, you are building cruise ships and castles on the backs of poor taxpayers, in which case  :nono:
My winning smile and can-do attitude.

Offline MouseRat

  • Mall Santa/Amateur Surgeon
  • Point Plank'r
  • Combo-Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 391
  • Pound £*#%ing sand!
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...

Honest question:  Why is this whole "Revenue needs to be > Expenses" concept so hard for you guys?

 :dunno:

You must spend that paper, that's the mandate, unless, of course, you are building cruise ships and castles on the backs of poor taxpayers, in which case  :nono:

I could be wrong here, but I believe most of the funds fronted for facility upgrades was privately donated. 
I’ve started to kind of hate people, and it’s not because I have anything against them. It’s just, I enjoy it. It’s recreation.
-Louis C.K.

Offline Bqqkie Pimp

  • qoEMAW ambassador
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6475
  • qoEMAW's official representative to goEMAW
    • View Profile
Everytime I read beems posts about 'revenue', I'm reminded why K-State is lapping ku in virtually everything... Can anybody confirm whether ku teaches the difference between revenue and profitability over there?

 :whistle1:


Revenue is more important for an athletic department.


 :facepalm:

I'm genuinely embarrassed for you.  If your revenue doesn't exceed your expenses, in ANY business model, it becomes a moot point.

No charge.

I'm not really embarrassed for you, because your feelings are insignificant to me.  I'd just like to point out that making a lot of money and spending a lot of money is not a bad thing.  Don't be a funky-looking triangle...

Honest question:  Why is this whole "Revenue needs to be > Expenses" concept so hard for you guys?

 :dunno:

You must spend that paper, that's the mandate, unless, of course, you are building cruise ships and castles on the backs of poor taxpayers, in which case  :nono:

While you're generally a pretty ok poster Spracs, don't go full on beems here.  You'll end up embarrassing yourself.   Spending over $18M more than you take in is a recipe for disaster and I think speaks volumes towards your futility in all things not basketball.

http://www.usatoday.com/sports/college/schools/finances/

 :buh-bye:
bears are fast...

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
There are a couple things that are really dumb to do when arguing with beems on the internet.

1) Make fun of him for being on a rivals message board (who cares?)

2) Say weird personal things

3) Suck at bbs'ing

Offline 420seriouscat69

  • Don't get zapped! #zap
  • Wackycat
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 63922
  • #1 rated - gE NFL Scout
    • View Profile
There are a couple things that are really dumb to do when arguing with beems on the internet.

1) Make fun of him for being on a rivals message board (who cares?)

2) Say weird personal things

3) Suck at bbs'ing
he's fine, but terrible at thinking with a neutral mind.

Offline Benja

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6365
    • View Profile
There are a couple things that are really dumb to do when arguing with beems on the internet.

1) Make fun of him for being on a rivals message board (who cares?)

2) Say weird personal things

3) Suck at bbs'ing
he's fine, but terrible at thinking with a neutral mind.

 :thumbsup: