Author Topic: KU football is NOT going through a rough patch. Cheer on our hawk brothers here!  (Read 3221386 times)

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline TheTruth

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 205
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16675 on: December 12, 2016, 07:38:46 PM »
Quote
David Beaty's contract extension at Kansas (through 2021) includes a $100,000 bonus for each win against a Power 5 opponent and $50,000 for any other victory. He will receive $200,000 if Kansas reaches a bowl game. His salary increases to $1.6 million and goes up by $100,000 each year. Beaty is 2-22 at the school but last month led Kansas to its first win over Texas since 1938 and snapped a 19-game Big 12 losing streak.

You get bonuses for just winning a game?

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7093
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16676 on: December 12, 2016, 07:40:19 PM »
Quote
David Beaty's contract extension at Kansas (through 2021) includes a $100,000 bonus for each win against a Power 5 opponent and $50,000 for any other victory. He will receive $200,000 if Kansas reaches a bowl game. His salary increases to $1.6 million and goes up by $100,000 each year. Beaty is 2-22 at the school but last month led Kansas to its first win over Texas since 1938 and snapped a 19-game Big 12 losing streak.

You get bonuses for just winning a game?
Uhh not just any game, but a conference game.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51510
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16677 on: December 12, 2016, 08:56:26 PM »
He was gonna leave

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30437
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16678 on: December 12, 2016, 09:26:42 PM »
I'm sure someone has left a power 5 head coaching job to be a position coach before i just can't think of one instance
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9380
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16679 on: December 12, 2016, 09:40:15 PM »
The most impressive thing about McCarney IMO is not going 9-3, it's 7-7. How in the literal eff.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13753
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16680 on: December 12, 2016, 09:53:06 PM »
The most impressive thing about McCarney IMO is not going 9-3, it's 7-7. How in the literal eff.

Eddie Robinson Classic participants could have a 14 game schedule...we did in 2000.  Iowa State had a 7-6 record before losing their bowl game in 2002.

Offline cfbandyman

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9380
  • To da 'ville.
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16681 on: December 12, 2016, 10:21:50 PM »
The most impressive thing about McCarney IMO is not going 9-3, it's 7-7. How in the literal eff.

Eddie Robinson Classic participants could have a 14 game schedule...we did in 2000.  Iowa State had a 7-6 record before losing their bowl game in 2002.

Ah, I thought that was '03 for us but makes sense.
A&M Style: 1/19/13 Co-Champion of THE ED's College Basketball Challenge

The art of the deal with it poors

OG Elon hater with a tesla


Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44895
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16682 on: December 12, 2016, 10:29:34 PM »
the weirdos who have some opinion that mccarney wasn't complete dogshit for decades are very lol. you run across them a lot.

I don't understand how his record is much different than Mangino's.

trajectory

This post and your Indiana post leads me to believe that you forgot how Mangino finished at KU.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16683 on: December 13, 2016, 12:27:51 AM »
Allegedly they did this so he wouldn't leave to take the OC job at UT.

I need a ruling from the judges here.

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16684 on: December 13, 2016, 12:30:08 AM »
Allegedly they did this so he wouldn't leave to take the OC job at UT.

Tom Herman is too smart and savvy to insult the mega-moneyed UT alums, who call the shots at UT, by hiring a guy who's won two games in two years.

That said, giving an extension and raise, with incentives for each win, to a guy with a 2-22 record is entirely consistent with Zenger's approach to KU FB.

Offline catastrophe

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15224
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16685 on: December 13, 2016, 07:32:03 AM »
All that salary stuff doesn't mean a whole lot unless they significantly bumped up Beaty's buyout as well. I'm guessing they were just able to afford paying him a little more because one of their former coaches is finally coming off the payroll.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64047
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16686 on: December 13, 2016, 08:04:26 AM »
Tom Herman needs a nickname 'cause Tom Herman is a gross name
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16687 on: December 13, 2016, 08:33:59 AM »
the weirdos who have some opinion that mccarney wasn't complete dogshit for decades are very lol. you run across them a lot.

I don't understand how his record is much different than Mangino's.

trajectory

This post and your Indiana post leads me to believe that you forgot how Mangino finished at KU.

No, I remember. Mangino's last year at KU would have been about an average year for McCarney. To compare the two is just ridiculous. And my god, Indiana football is terrible. They had a nice little run of barely getting bowl eligible, but pretty soon they'll be back to their 3 or 4 win every year selves.

Offline ChiComCat

  • Chawbacon
  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17593
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16688 on: December 13, 2016, 08:38:58 AM »
lol @ KU's insecurities

Offline kslim

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 10531
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16689 on: December 13, 2016, 08:50:25 AM »
Whatever gets beems back here im all for it

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16690 on: December 13, 2016, 08:51:38 AM »
No, I remember. Mangino's last year at KU would have been about an average year for McCarney. To compare the two is just ridiculous. And my god, Indiana football is terrible. They had a nice little run of barely getting bowl eligible, but pretty soon they'll be back to their 3 or 4 win every year selves.

Its really not as ridiculous as you think. McCarney was granted extreme patience and his first 5 years were awful while Mangino only had one of those. However, the last 7 years for each coach are pretty similar, Mangino's one really good year was just better than McCarney's.

McCarney
2000   Iowa State   9–3   5–3   3rd (North)   W Insight.com   23   25
2001   Iowa State   7–5   4–4   3rd (North)   L Independence      
2002   Iowa State   7–7   4–4   3rd (North)   L Humanitarian      
2003   Iowa State   2–10   0–8   6th (North)         
2004   Iowa State   7–5   4–4   T–1st (North)   W Independence      
2005   Iowa State   7–5   4–4   T–2nd (North)   L Houston      
2006   Iowa State   4–8   1–7   6th (North)   

Mangino
2003   Kansas   6–7   3–5   T–4th (North)   L Tangerine      
2004   Kansas   4–7   2–6   T–5th (North)         
2005   Kansas   7–5   3–5   5th (North)   W Fort Worth      
2006   Kansas   6–6   3–5   4th (North)         
2007   Kansas   12–1   7–1   T–1st (North)   W Orange†   7   7
2008   Kansas   8–5   4–4   3rd (North)   W Insight      
2009   Kansas   5–7   1–7   6th (North)   

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16691 on: December 13, 2016, 08:53:57 AM »
If you just looked at those year to year records and had to choose a coach, which one would you pick?

Offline Unruly

  • Oh so Unruly.
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2703
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16692 on: December 13, 2016, 09:00:08 AM »
If you just looked at those year to year records and had to choose a coach, which one would you pick?

I'm riding that 12-1 into the sunset baby.

But both are really  :goodbyecruelworld:
:dance:


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16693 on: December 13, 2016, 09:06:45 AM »
Mangino had a higher peak, but McCarney was slightly more consistent in Big 12 play (in probably a tougher league).

Both had arguably the best coaching runs at their respective schools.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16694 on: December 13, 2016, 09:13:38 AM »
Mangino had a higher peak, but McCarney was slightly more consistent in Big 12 play (in probably a tougher league).

Both had arguably the best coaching runs at their respective schools.

That's when you throw out McCarney's four 1-7 seasons, though.

Offline Joker

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1395
  • Resident Play-Hard Chartologist
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16695 on: December 13, 2016, 09:21:41 AM »
If you just looked at those year to year records and had to choose a coach, which one would you pick?

That's a pretty sick and twisted "would you rather?".

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16696 on: December 13, 2016, 09:22:46 AM »
Mangino had a higher peak, but McCarney was slightly more consistent in Big 12 play (in probably a tougher league).

Both had arguably the best coaching runs at their respective schools.

That's when you throw out McCarney's four 1-7 seasons, though.

I won't argue that, but he inherited a worse program. It really is amazing to not fire a guy after 5 straight 1-7 conference seasons. KU at least had a decent run as recently as in the 90s with Glen Mason.


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16697 on: December 13, 2016, 09:28:00 AM »
Mangino had a higher peak, but McCarney was slightly more consistent in Big 12 play (in probably a tougher league).

Both had arguably the best coaching runs at their respective schools.

That's when you throw out McCarney's four 1-7 seasons, though.

I won't argue that, but he inherited a worse program. It really is amazing to not fire a guy after 5 straight 1-7 conference seasons. KU at least had a decent run as recently as in the 90s with Glen Mason.

Terry Allen had a 5 year run, though...

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16698 on: December 13, 2016, 09:34:57 AM »
True, and it was really bad. But Iowa State's program history is much worse, especially when you consider that McCarney is probably their best coach ever. Honestly, before Bill, only K-State was a worse program in the Big 12 and probably the country than Iowa State.

KU has had sporadic success and bowl appearances throughout its history, though Mangino arguable still had their best stretch for one coach.

I would pick Mangino over McCarney, but I don't think McCarney is that much worse.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: KU football is hurting
« Reply #16699 on: December 13, 2016, 09:38:27 AM »
Mangino had a higher peak, but McCarney was slightly more consistent in Big 12 play (in probably a tougher league).

Both had arguably the best coaching runs at their respective schools.

That's when you throw out McCarney's four 1-7 seasons, though.

I won't argue that, but he inherited a worse program. It really is amazing to not fire a guy after 5 straight 1-7 conference seasons. KU at least had a decent run as recently as in the 90s with Glen Mason.

It really makes you wonder what sort of mediocrity other coaches that get fired after 3-4 years would have risen to if they just had more time.