This abstract of a recent scientific study seems a much more plausible explanation of global temperature increase than the short term reasoning of CO2 emissions.
Abstract
Just curious as to what your background is that causes you to believe this is a more plausible explanation? Not saying it is or it isn't. I'm a pretty scientific minded person, but I don't feel like, nor do I suspect anyone else on this blog is, I am qualified enough to make educated comments on the complicated science at play here. As such, it really intrigues me when people take such strong stands on such issues.
For a while, human induced CO2 looked like a slam dunk as the direct cause of climate change. As science has progressed, some holes, or at least major questions have been exposed. That is how it is supposed to work 99% of the time.
I don't see any reason to suspect the moon tide theory to be any different, and it blows my mind how many people seem to think they are some kind of climate change expert because they took an atmospheric chemistry class once, or read up on some selective summaries of scientific papers online.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk 4