Author Topic: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread  (Read 435675 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3600 on: August 07, 2018, 03:56:40 PM »
Fun fact: asbestos is a naturally occuring mineral.

Made up Fact: you can buy asbestos extract from your young living pyramid scheme dealer.

Fun Fact: Radon is a naturally occurring gas.

radon is super bad in Nebraska. we don't have it but some people I know tested for it and had like 30x the level when you need to do something about it. really has to suck when you spend your entire life not burning delicious heaters only to get radon cancer.

You're a dumbass
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51501
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3601 on: August 07, 2018, 03:59:00 PM »
FSD hates your analogy of 2 naturally occurring carcinogens


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3602 on: August 07, 2018, 04:00:30 PM »
Like radium???? 
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3603 on: August 07, 2018, 04:02:42 PM »
Or carbon dioxide (per obama)???

The on point hard hitting analogies are endless
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline EMAWican

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1202
  • 'Murica
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3604 on: August 07, 2018, 04:06:53 PM »
emawican, if you read the article, it stated that almost all of the asbestos currently used in the us is used by chlorine manufacturers.


if your point was that companies aren't going go around shoving asbestos in building materials again just because the federal govt is relaxing regulations, i agree with you.

Quote
"EPA is now allowing asbestos back into manufacturing"

Let's slow down on the EPA allowing companies to produce friable asbestos insulation fantasy talking point.

People that live, work, or even visit a building that was built prior to 1985 are around asbestos everyday.

What % have been abated?

Asbestos only has to be abated based on planned disturbance (demo or renovation), type, and/or condition of the material. If a material has over 1% asbestos, it is then regulated as an "asbestos containing material."

Asbestos is in everything - floor tiles and mastic, pinhole/textured ceiling tiles (the drop ceilings everywhere), sheet rock and joints, plaster, adhesives, fireproofing, piping joints, insulation, roofing materials, weather proofing materials, window glazing, caulks, cove base and mastic, insulation, doors, valve packings, industrial fuses, etc. So neglecting materials with 0.01-0.9999% asbestos and asbestos materials that aren't required to be abated I'd put it at around 10-15%. 85-90% of buildings have asbestos in them somewhere.

There's asbestos in building materials that were installed as recently as the mid to late-2000s but those are pretty rare.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51501
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3605 on: August 07, 2018, 04:10:10 PM »
Like radium????

"yes just like radium"

someone who failed science and doesn't understand manufacturing

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51501
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3606 on: August 07, 2018, 04:12:51 PM »
emawican, if you read the article, it stated that almost all of the asbestos currently used in the us is used by chlorine manufacturers.


if your point was that companies aren't going go around shoving asbestos in building materials again just because the federal govt is relaxing regulations, i agree with you.

Quote
"EPA is now allowing asbestos back into manufacturing"

Let's slow down on the EPA allowing companies to produce friable asbestos insulation fantasy talking point.

People that live, work, or even visit a building that was built prior to 1985 are around asbestos everyday.

What % have been abated?

Asbestos only has to be abated based on planned disturbance (demo or renovation), type, and/or condition of the material. If a material has over 1% asbestos, it is then regulated as an "asbestos containing material."

Asbestos is in everything - floor tiles and mastic, pinhole/textured ceiling tiles (the drop ceilings everywhere), sheet rock and joints, plaster, adhesives, fireproofing, piping joints, insulation, roofing materials, weather proofing materials, window glazing, caulks, cove base and mastic, insulation, doors, valve packings, industrial fuses, etc. So neglecting materials with 0.01-0.9999% asbestos and asbestos materials that aren't required to be abated I'd put it at around 10-15%. 85-90% of buildings have asbestos in them somewhere.

There's asbestos in building materials that were installed as recently as the mid to late-2000s but those are pretty rare.

you forgot welding rods, grinding wheels, break pads, gaskets and even Christmas tree decorations!

But I get you.  There is asbestos in the ambient air everywhere.  I forget what the background level is in most cities...

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40515
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3607 on: August 08, 2018, 12:47:13 AM »
all that predicted new renewable generation capacity looks to be occupied with new transport demand.  although i'm not sure i have quite the confidence in this prediction as the last one i posted.

https://twitter.com/BloombergNEF/status/1026844937072123904
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3608 on: August 08, 2018, 08:00:22 AM »
allow me to step in and inform everyone that there is not a single non-toxic substance in the universe. the only thing that's crucial is the level of the dose and the length of the exposure (acute vs. chronic).

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53281
    • View Profile
The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3609 on: August 08, 2018, 08:37:48 AM »
Take us through the battery production process Trey.   

From the mines to the production floor.

Here’s a primer. It takes as much 500k gallons of water to mine 1 ton of Lithium.   Lithium is found in places that water is scarce. 

« Last Edit: August 08, 2018, 08:42:59 AM by sonofdaxjones »

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3610 on: August 08, 2018, 09:02:30 AM »
Take us through the battery production process Trey.   

From the mines to the production floor.

Here’s a primer. It takes as much 500k gallons of water to mine 1 ton of Lithium.   Lithium is found in places that water is scarce.

what does your crusade against Li-containing batteries have to do with my post about asbestos toxicity, other than the fact that you are the asbestos of posters? that's a hypothetical question, btw, don't answer because I don't care.


Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64025
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3611 on: August 08, 2018, 09:03:45 AM »
Good grief dax  :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53281
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3612 on: August 08, 2018, 10:36:26 AM »
Take us through the battery production process Trey.   

From the mines to the production floor.

Here’s a primer. It takes as much 500k gallons of water to mine 1 ton of Lithium.   Lithium is found in places that water is scarce.

what does your crusade against Li-containing batteries have to do with my post about asbestos toxicity, other than the fact that you are the asbestos of posters? that's a hypothetical question, btw, don't answer because I don't care.

You did not quote.  See also sys’s post. 

FFS you resident LibBots are lazy AF.

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64025
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3613 on: August 08, 2018, 10:38:24 AM »
He's confused again  :frown:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53281
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3614 on: August 08, 2018, 10:40:54 AM »
He's confused again  :frown:

You literally respond to every post I put on here.

You and the The Big Tuck are obsessed with me. 

Offline star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64025
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3615 on: August 08, 2018, 10:42:39 AM »
I'm worried for your health. What if you have a bout of confusion while driving?  :frown:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53281
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3616 on: August 08, 2018, 10:45:09 AM »
I'm worried for your health. What if you have a bout of confusion while driving?  :frown:

If sys hadn’t posted what he posted then you might have a point.

But again.  Just admit you’re obsessed with everything I say and you’ll feel better. 

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3617 on: August 08, 2018, 10:48:48 AM »
Take us through the battery production process Trey.   

From the mines to the production floor.

Here’s a primer. It takes as much 500k gallons of water to mine 1 ton of Lithium.   Lithium is found in places that water is scarce.

what does your crusade against Li-containing batteries have to do with my post about asbestos toxicity, other than the fact that you are the asbestos of posters? that's a hypothetical question, btw, don't answer because I don't care.

You did not quote.  See also sys’s post.

FFS you resident LibBots are lazy AF.

only one of the current conversational tracks was talking about the toxicity of various substances. (hint: it wasn't the renewable energy one). don't blame me for your lack of perception.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3618 on: August 08, 2018, 01:13:49 PM »
All I know is that lithium is something we definitely want to have in large concentrations in large population centers. Cadmium too.
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline treysolid

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3483
  • complacent and self-involved
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3619 on: August 08, 2018, 01:46:42 PM »
All I know is that lithium is something we definitely want to have in large concentrations in large population centers. Cadmium too.

Of course. Pb-acid batteries are definitely the epitome of energy storage technology anyway, right?

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51501
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3620 on: August 08, 2018, 02:44:33 PM »
All I know is that lithium is something we definitely want to have in large concentrations in large population centers. Cadmium too.

and the ever present radium

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3621 on: August 08, 2018, 02:50:39 PM »
 :nono:  we're not really interested in nuclear power anymore, especially not close to any major city. Something bad could happen.

All I know is that lithium is something we definitely want to have in large concentrations in large population centers. Cadmium too.

and the ever present radium
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3622 on: August 08, 2018, 02:52:13 PM »
All I know is that lithium is something we definitely want to have in large concentrations in large population centers. Cadmium too.

Of course. Pb-acid batteries are definitely the epitome of energy storage technology anyway, right?

Isn't pb lead ????  :runaway:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51501
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3623 on: August 08, 2018, 03:19:09 PM »
:nono:  we're not really interested in nuclear power anymore, especially not close to any major city. Something bad could happen.

All I know is that lithium is something we definitely want to have in large concentrations in large population centers. Cadmium too.

and the ever present radium


that makes even less sense then usual

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53281
    • View Profile
Re: The Scott Pruitt "If the models are all wrong" thread
« Reply #3624 on: August 08, 2018, 09:29:48 PM »
Take us through the battery production process Trey.   

From the mines to the production floor.

Here’s a primer. It takes as much 500k gallons of water to mine 1 ton of Lithium.   Lithium is found in places that water is scarce.

what does your crusade against Li-containing batteries have to do with my post about asbestos toxicity, other than the fact that you are the asbestos of posters? that's a hypothetical question, btw, don't answer because I don't care.

You did not quote.  See also sys’s post.

FFS you resident LibBots are lazy AF.

only one of the current conversational tracks was talking about the toxicity of various substances. (hint: it wasn't the renewable energy one). don't blame me for your lack of perception.

Um hmm