0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Point 1. The first 5 books of the Bible were derived principally from oral histories passed down through generations and, while they contain some tribal history, they also contain many fables, stories, issues of tribal rules and laws etc. There is no evidence that any primates human or otherwise have ever had the type of lifespans the Bible proposes. Point 2. There is ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE for a worldwide flood as described in the Bible. In fact the geological and physical evidence specifically shows there was no worldwide flood...particularly in the last 10,000 years (within the YEC time lines)Point 3. The so called "water canopy" is physically impossible...I could spend paragraphs on the science but instead I will simply refer you to a wonderful video which explains the scientific impossibility.…And please...creationists...if you are going to regail me with all of your scientific proof of the flood...don't bother unless you are demonstrating via actual peer-reviewed publicly funded research, published in legitimate scientific journals (things like SCIENCE, NATURE, THE AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PALEONTOLOGY ETC....by actual scientists with degrees from accredited university ...not idiots with degrees in the "Philosophy of Science", or Theology, or business management. BTW... I am not an atheist. But to I am a realist. To insist on literal interpretations of scripture to the denail of every single piece of scientific evidence is ignorant and does Christianity a disservice.Source(s):Research Scientist. College Professor
Quote from: steve dave on May 06, 2013, 08:35:09 AMQuote from: j-dub on May 06, 2013, 08:28:14 AMQuote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 09:05:12 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:58:48 PMQuote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 08:55:46 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:46:12 PMQuote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.How about geology and biology?Could you please be a little more specific, and I will gladly research these issues.Length of time the earth has existed, flood, evolution, dinosaurs and humans co-existing, etc.the evolution/creation debates based on the creation accounts in Genesis are misguided. fundamentalist christianity has done itself and everyone else a disservice by refusing to consider anything but a literal 6 day creation. the early church fathers held several different views concerning how old the world was, whether or not Genesis was to be taken literally, etc.. most did not adhere to the literal 6 day creation view.well, the book of exodus is a manufactured story to try to fit the history of the jewish people into the prophesies/timeline of genesis. I mean, the jews were never enslaved in Egypt. that may be one of the "archaeology" proving the bible wrong things fun muffin was talking about but it may just be history proving it wrong. then they stretched the average jewish lifespan to around 150 years to try to fit it into the calendar. once you do that much work to try to validate older stories by creating new ones you can't just pitch it all.first time i've heard this. got any links?
Quote from: j-dub on May 06, 2013, 08:28:14 AMQuote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 09:05:12 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:58:48 PMQuote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 08:55:46 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:46:12 PMQuote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.How about geology and biology?Could you please be a little more specific, and I will gladly research these issues.Length of time the earth has existed, flood, evolution, dinosaurs and humans co-existing, etc.the evolution/creation debates based on the creation accounts in Genesis are misguided. fundamentalist christianity has done itself and everyone else a disservice by refusing to consider anything but a literal 6 day creation. the early church fathers held several different views concerning how old the world was, whether or not Genesis was to be taken literally, etc.. most did not adhere to the literal 6 day creation view.well, the book of exodus is a manufactured story to try to fit the history of the jewish people into the prophesies/timeline of genesis. I mean, the jews were never enslaved in Egypt. that may be one of the "archaeology" proving the bible wrong things fun muffin was talking about but it may just be history proving it wrong. then they stretched the average jewish lifespan to around 150 years to try to fit it into the calendar. once you do that much work to try to validate older stories by creating new ones you can't just pitch it all.
Quote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 09:05:12 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:58:48 PMQuote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 08:55:46 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:46:12 PMQuote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.How about geology and biology?Could you please be a little more specific, and I will gladly research these issues.Length of time the earth has existed, flood, evolution, dinosaurs and humans co-existing, etc.the evolution/creation debates based on the creation accounts in Genesis are misguided. fundamentalist christianity has done itself and everyone else a disservice by refusing to consider anything but a literal 6 day creation. the early church fathers held several different views concerning how old the world was, whether or not Genesis was to be taken literally, etc.. most did not adhere to the literal 6 day creation view.
Quote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:58:48 PMQuote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 08:55:46 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:46:12 PMQuote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.How about geology and biology?Could you please be a little more specific, and I will gladly research these issues.Length of time the earth has existed, flood, evolution, dinosaurs and humans co-existing, etc.
Quote from: steve dave on May 05, 2013, 08:55:46 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:46:12 PMQuote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.How about geology and biology?Could you please be a little more specific, and I will gladly research these issues.
Quote from: fun muffin on May 05, 2013, 08:46:12 PMQuote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.How about geology and biology?
Quote from: CNS Casey on May 05, 2013, 08:40:19 PMLol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.I find the Bible to be quite reliable actually.http://carm.org/archaeological-evidence-verifying-biblical-citiesNo archaeological discovery has ever contradicted the Bible.
Lol at believers requiring conclusive evidence.
topical. great mother.http://deadspin.com/brittney-griner-first-came-out-to-her-mother-in-the-nin-493147041?utm_campaign=socialflow_deadspin_twitter&utm_source=deadspin_twitter&utm_medium=socialflow
Quote from: EllRobersonisInnocent on May 06, 2013, 01:08:51 PMThat person should be put down (humanely of course) like a sick dog, JFC Maybe you prefer this explanation.QuoteCreation starts with a perfect world, perfect conditions, and perfect humans with no genetic mutations.Paleontology has shown that there was 50% more oxygen in the pre-flood world, as well as twice the air pressure.The "canopy theory" of water or ice surrounding the pre-flood globe would also block all UV rays and x-rays from the sun that cause us to age so rapidly. Things were a lot different before the flood. After the flood life spans began to drop off dramatically.I've heard variations of this explanation given by some very qualified scientists, and it makes the best sense given all the evidence.
That person should be put down (humanely of course) like a sick dog, JFC
Creation starts with a perfect world, perfect conditions, and perfect humans with no genetic mutations.Paleontology has shown that there was 50% more oxygen in the pre-flood world, as well as twice the air pressure.The "canopy theory" of water or ice surrounding the pre-flood globe would also block all UV rays and x-rays from the sun that cause us to age so rapidly. Things were a lot different before the flood. After the flood life spans began to drop off dramatically.I've heard variations of this explanation given by some very qualified scientists, and it makes the best sense given all the evidence.
Quote from: CFoD on May 06, 2013, 01:11:21 PMQuote from: EllRobersonisInnocent on May 06, 2013, 01:08:51 PMThat person should be put down (humanely of course) like a sick dog, JFC Maybe you prefer this explanation.QuoteCreation starts with a perfect world, perfect conditions, and perfect humans with no genetic mutations.Paleontology has shown that there was 50% more oxygen in the pre-flood world, as well as twice the air pressure.The "canopy theory" of water or ice surrounding the pre-flood globe would also block all UV rays and x-rays from the sun that cause us to age so rapidly. Things were a lot different before the flood. After the flood life spans began to drop off dramatically.I've heard variations of this explanation given by some very qualified scientists, and it makes the best sense given all the evidence.Maybe the people who live in Iowa aren't such huge dumb fucks.
global flood less than 5,000 years ago wiping out all life on this planet (including dinosaurs) other than the people and animals on one big ass boat.source: the good bookthis is 2013 and people believe and argue for this being a real thing. horribly sad. not as sad as that same book causing people to believe and argue for people doing evil just because they are gay but sad.
"Son. This is why we are wildcats. Hard work, pride, the heart of this country. And if that's not enough for you, you can just move to California with your punk friends."
Quote from: steve dave on May 06, 2013, 01:19:19 PMglobal flood less than 5,000 years ago wiping out all life on this planet (including dinosaurs) other than the people and animals on one big ass boat.source: the good bookthis is 2013 and people believe and argue for this being a real thing. horribly sad. not as sad as that same book causing people to believe and argue for people doing evil just because they are gay but sad.it's pretty much on par with believing that god spoke directly to a bunch of dudes thousands of years ago and they accurately transcribed his message and through all the edits and interpretations and translations it remains absolutely accurate to this day...and then using that book as your moral compass. I really want to respect them and their opinions but it's just so rough ridin' hard to take them seriously.
Quote from: Rams on May 06, 2013, 02:24:39 PMQuote from: steve dave on May 06, 2013, 01:19:19 PMglobal flood less than 5,000 years ago wiping out all life on this planet (including dinosaurs) other than the people and animals on one big ass boat.source: the good bookthis is 2013 and people believe and argue for this being a real thing. horribly sad. not as sad as that same book causing people to believe and argue for people doing evil just because they are gay but sad.it's pretty much on par with believing that god spoke directly to a bunch of dudes thousands of years ago and they accurately transcribed his message and through all the edits and interpretations and translations it remains absolutely accurate to this day...and then using that book as your moral compass. I really want to respect them and their opinions but it's just so rough ridin' hard to take them seriously.I enjoy the belief in the authenticity/veracity of any one particular religion over the teaming multitude of other religions past and present. "I genuinely believe all this crazy, impossible stuff happened way back when and I will follow it faithfully.""What about all that other competing crazy, impossible crap other people believe in?""Clearly false.""Why?""Because Jesus."The suspension of disbelief necessary is so very unsettling.
http://www.economist.com/news/international/21577043-american-christian-zealots-are-fighting-back-against-gay-rightsabroad-strange-bedfellowstl;dnrkansas affiliated preacher hates gays. travels to uganda to preach message. ugandans pass legislation mandating killing of gays.
Quote from: OK Cat on May 06, 2013, 10:09:30 AMi would like a resident bible-beater to address same-sex relationships in the animal world (because animals don't have logic and reasoning skills, so they can't really choose to be anything)seems to point to genetics, which would mean that they were born that way. I'll take this. Animals are going to hell. They break 3-4 commandments per day.
i would like a resident bible-beater to address same-sex relationships in the animal world (because animals don't have logic and reasoning skills, so they can't really choose to be anything)seems to point to genetics, which would mean that they were born that way.
Quote from: CFoD on May 06, 2013, 10:11:53 AMQuote from: OK Cat on May 06, 2013, 10:09:30 AMi would like a resident bible-beater to address same-sex relationships in the animal world (because animals don't have logic and reasoning skills, so they can't really choose to be anything)seems to point to genetics, which would mean that they were born that way. I'll take this. Animals are going to hell. They break 3-4 commandments per day.Just because you say that homosexuality is normal or natural because it happens in the animal kingdom does not mean it is morally correct. Animals also eat each other alive, devour offspring, etc. Should we imitate those things as well because animals do it? Of course not.
in the end, EMAW will always win.
Quote from: fun muffin on May 06, 2013, 12:01:31 AMBehold, a message from a Kansas State student who has found JOYThis is his testimony Perhaps your hearts will be enlightened. I just watched that first four minutes but that was pretty rough ridin' sad.
Behold, a message from a Kansas State student who has found JOYThis is his testimony Perhaps your hearts will be enlightened.
Quote from: fun muffin on May 06, 2013, 03:51:32 PMQuote from: CFoD on May 06, 2013, 10:11:53 AMQuote from: OK Cat on May 06, 2013, 10:09:30 AMi would like a resident bible-beater to address same-sex relationships in the animal world (because animals don't have logic and reasoning skills, so they can't really choose to be anything)seems to point to genetics, which would mean that they were born that way. I'll take this. Animals are going to hell. They break 3-4 commandments per day.Just because you say that homosexuality is normal or natural because it happens in the animal kingdom does not mean it is morally correct. Animals also eat each other alive, devour offspring, etc. Should we imitate those things as well because animals do it? Of course not.So you concede that homosexuality is natural? So God is making the mistake?
I'll admit that I'm completely uneducated on Christianity. what is the difference between the old testament and new? what makes it new? who decided that was the actual word of God?
Quote from: ChiCat on May 06, 2013, 03:53:50 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 06, 2013, 03:51:32 PMQuote from: CFoD on May 06, 2013, 10:11:53 AMQuote from: OK Cat on May 06, 2013, 10:09:30 AMi would like a resident bible-beater to address same-sex relationships in the animal world (because animals don't have logic and reasoning skills, so they can't really choose to be anything)seems to point to genetics, which would mean that they were born that way. I'll take this. Animals are going to hell. They break 3-4 commandments per day.Just because you say that homosexuality is normal or natural because it happens in the animal kingdom does not mean it is morally correct. Animals also eat each other alive, devour offspring, etc. Should we imitate those things as well because animals do it? Of course not.So you concede that homosexuality is natural? So God is making the mistake?No I will absolutely not concede that. The Bible is quite clear it's not natural. It is quite obviously against God's design.
Quote from: fun muffin on May 06, 2013, 04:10:25 PMQuote from: ChiCat on May 06, 2013, 03:53:50 PMQuote from: fun muffin on May 06, 2013, 03:51:32 PMQuote from: CFoD on May 06, 2013, 10:11:53 AMQuote from: OK Cat on May 06, 2013, 10:09:30 AMi would like a resident bible-beater to address same-sex relationships in the animal world (because animals don't have logic and reasoning skills, so they can't really choose to be anything)seems to point to genetics, which would mean that they were born that way. I'll take this. Animals are going to hell. They break 3-4 commandments per day.Just because you say that homosexuality is normal or natural because it happens in the animal kingdom does not mean it is morally correct. Animals also eat each other alive, devour offspring, etc. Should we imitate those things as well because animals do it? Of course not.So you concede that homosexuality is natural? So God is making the mistake?No I will absolutely not concede that. The Bible is quite clear it's not natural. It is quite obviously against God's design.Also this: I previously mentioned, probably 10 pages ago, that homosexuality leads to self-destruction or the extinction of whatever species is doing this. So my question is how is it natural for if it leads to extinction.?Wouldn't natural selection remove something that leads to extinction? I never did receive a satisfactory answer to this question.Therefore, it seems to me that homosexuality is more of a learned behavior.
God should wipe all gays out with another global flood.