Author Topic: Stan Talks about Angel  (Read 27865 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ZappaCat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 227
    • View Profile
Stan Talks about Angel
« on: April 23, 2013, 10:22:24 AM »
Stan Weber to be on 810 soon talking about Angel, won't be able to listen, can anyone give a recap?


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #1 on: April 23, 2013, 10:22:48 AM »
I'll try to give one zappa. there may be a delay or I may not give one at all but if possible I will.

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #2 on: April 23, 2013, 10:24:01 AM »
I'll try to give one zappa. there may be a delay or I may not give one at all but if possible I will.

  :thumbs: sd 810 recaps are always great.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #3 on: April 23, 2013, 10:25:12 AM »
I'll try to give one zappa. there may be a delay or I may not give one at all but if possible I will.

  :thumbs: sd 810 recaps are always great.

i enjoy it quite a bit!

Offline ZappaCat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 227
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #4 on: April 23, 2013, 10:34:33 AM »
I'll try to give one zappa. there may be a delay or I may not give one at all but if possible I will.

Thanks SD!

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #5 on: April 23, 2013, 10:48:38 AM »
picked up mid-stream-
was optimistic about next year, now you have to question it (thx stan).  thinks about next year the same way he thought about this year (thx stan).  mid to lower part of conference.

fortunately k-state really attacked PG position in recruiting (thx stan)

one of the new kids (maybe foster) will start at PG next season (thx stan), thomas not eligible until 12/15 (thx stan)

going from veteran leader to maybe a new kid starting PG although Doc Spradling could run the point during the non-con but hopefully moves back to 2 by conf games

loss of angel absorbed/impact lessened somewhat by oscar's motion offense

shane southwell needs to keep his focus and is capable of playing a lot of positions and could play the 2 to Doc's 1.
shane is the wildcard (<----new nickname?)

would oscar have gotten contract extension if angel left before?  stan:  yes absolutely (Big 12 coy) + it was written in his contract

angel never acted like was unhappy, no hint was given.  angel really wants to be closer to his family

soren's final four-
1) football teams record next year:  9-3
2) do you foul up 3 w/ less than 10 seconds:  yes
3) the basketball record next year:  22-13
4) who do the chiefs take #1:  luke jokel





Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #6 on: April 23, 2013, 10:49:02 AM »
- Stan completely caught off guard by this.  Spoke with him at awards banquet and he was in great spirits

- Where does this put KSU in the Big 12 next year?  Was very optimistic, possible threat a the top.  Now you don't have that rock at PG.  Views them like they were preseason this year...mid-pack.  Possible Foster starting at PG.  Veteran to needing a a Freshman to start PG.

-  Does Weber's offense ease the pain?  Yes.  A guy like Will can play PG because of motion offense; ball movement.  Shane's ability to play many positions is huge...possible off-guard.

- Would Weber have gotten the extension had this happened before?  Yes, absolutely.  Obligated by contract.

- No hint at Angel being unhappy..."Ever"

- Hearing same info behind the scenes on reason for leaving.

- Stan says 22-13 bball record next

- 9-3 football

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #7 on: April 23, 2013, 10:54:16 AM »
day late and a dollar short, :lol: 


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #8 on: April 23, 2013, 10:57:05 AM »
day late and a dollar short, :lol:

yep, I just couldn't type what I was personally listening to fast enough I guess

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36688
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #9 on: April 23, 2013, 10:59:26 AM »
Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Offline EllRobersonisInnocent

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #10 on: April 23, 2013, 11:00:20 AM »
Would take 9-3 in football

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 53786
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #11 on: April 23, 2013, 11:00:58 AM »

Offline bones129

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 12132
  • RUN! Tell all the other curs the Law's coming!
    • View Profile
Re: Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #12 on: April 23, 2013, 11:01:18 AM »
Would take 9-3 in football

Definitely.

Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2


Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #13 on: April 23, 2013, 11:02:56 AM »
Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Yeah, that's a dumb point. All you have to do is look at the UMKC and South Dakota games when Angel and Tay didn't play because of injuries to get a picture of how next year might look. But we still had Rodney to play.

The new guards better be able to play well right away. Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

Offline ZappaCat

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 227
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #14 on: April 23, 2013, 11:06:11 AM »
 :frown: It's official, welcome back K-State Basketball 1990-2006  :facepalm:

catzacker

  • Guest
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #15 on: April 23, 2013, 11:07:32 AM »
I bet oscar's motion offense is the cure for cancer.  Is there anything it can't do?

Offline owl borland

  • Point Plank'r
  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 98
  • I thought hurricane season was over
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #16 on: April 23, 2013, 11:15:16 AM »
Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Yeah, that's a dumb point. All you have to do is look at the UMKC and South Dakota games when Angel and Tay didn't play because of injuries to get a picture of how next year might look. But we still had Rodney to play.

The new guards better be able to play well right away. Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

we were 22-12 (9-7) in the 08-09 season. I think (with the b12 being so down next year) we should have a comparable record to that season, so i'll buy 22-13... livin life on the bubble all year.
GIFSoup

Don't forget your power towel. Bring it to every game

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #17 on: April 23, 2013, 11:29:14 AM »
fortunately k-state really attacked PG position in recruiting

:lol: good one stan

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #18 on: April 23, 2013, 11:30:11 AM »
day late and a dollar short, :lol:

yep, I just couldn't type what I was personally listening to fast enough I guess
I'm incred efficient at transcribing


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #19 on: April 23, 2013, 11:31:45 AM »
day late and a dollar short, :lol:

yep, I just couldn't type what I was personally listening to fast enough I guess
I'm incred efficient at transcribing

Offline Dr Rick Daris

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 23383
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #20 on: April 23, 2013, 11:31:56 AM »
Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"


Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #21 on: April 23, 2013, 11:35:04 AM »
Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"



oh yeah :frown:

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46514
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #22 on: April 23, 2013, 11:35:07 AM »
day late and a dollar short, :lol:

yep, I just couldn't type what I was personally listening to fast enough I guess
I'm incred efficient at transcribing


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #23 on: April 23, 2013, 11:40:55 AM »
Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"



Good point.

We know we have Gonzaga next year, a likely OOC loss, but its likely the rest of the OOC is pretty soft. Probably 11-2 at worse.
The Big 12 is down, so 9-9 might still be manageable. Maybe 8-10 or 7-11.
Then 1-1 in the Big 12 tournament.
And 0-1 in the NIT.

That would be around 20-14.

Offline kougar24

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5380
    • View Profile
Re: Stan Talks about Angel
« Reply #24 on: April 23, 2013, 11:43:12 AM »
Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"



Good point.

We know we have Gonzaga next year, a likely OOC loss, but its likely the rest of the OOC is pretty soft. Probably 11-2 at worse.
The Big 12 is down, so 9-9 might still be manageable. Maybe 8-10 or 7-11.
Then 1-1 in the Big 12 tournament.
And 0-1 in the NIT.

That would be 20-14.

fireable offense