Stan Talks about Angel

[kso_FAN]

fireable offense

You can be as pissed as you want, but you know that isn't going to happen under that scenario.

[michigancat]

Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"

Good point.

We know we have Gonzaga next year, a likely OOC loss, but its likely the rest of the OOC is pretty soft. Probably 11-2 at worse.
The Big 12 is down, so 9-9 might still be manageable. Maybe 8-10 or 7-11.
Then 1-1 in the Big 12 tournament.
And 0-1 in the NIT.

That would be around 20-14.

sounds like a fun season!

[kougar24]

fireable offense

You can be as pissed as you want, but you know that isn't going to happen under that scenario.

oh i will be as pissed as i want.

[CNS]

Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Yeah, that's a dumb point. All you have to do is look at the UMKC and South Dakota games when Angel and Tay didn't play because of injuries to get a picture of how next year might look. But we still had Rodney to play.

The new guards better be able to play well right away. Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

we were 22-12 (9-7) in the 08-09 season. I think (with the b12 being so down next year) we should have a comparable record to that season, so i'll buy 22-13... livin life on the bubble all year.

'08 had Jake, Denis, Curt, Jamar, and Dom. 

'13 Sprads, Shane, Gip, Whothefuckcares, whothefuckcares

 

[Dr Rick Daris]

Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"

Good point.

We know we have Gonzaga next year, a likely OOC loss, but its likely the rest of the OOC is pretty soft. Probably 11-2 at worse.
The Big 12 is down, so 9-9 might still be manageable. Maybe 8-10 or 7-11.
Then 1-1 in the Big 12 tournament.
And 0-1 in the NIT.

That would be around 20-14.

12-1 in crap ooc
8-10 con
1-1 big12 tournament
1-1 NIT

22-13.

[michigancat]

Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

not necessarily...

"There's an art to scheduling. Coach (Gene) Keady told me a long time ago -- and I thought he was crazy --scheduling might be more important than recruiting, and in some aspects it is"

Good point.

We know we have Gonzaga next year, a likely OOC loss, but its likely the rest of the OOC is pretty soft. Probably 11-2 at worse.
The Big 12 is down, so 9-9 might still be manageable. Maybe 8-10 or 7-11.
Then 1-1 in the Big 12 tournament.
And 0-1 in the NIT.

That would be around 20-14.

12-1 in crap ooc
8-10 con
1-1 big12 tournament
1-1 NIT

22-13.

frank always sucked in the big 12 tourney

[EMAWesome]

Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Yeah, that's a dumb point. All you have to do is look at the UMKC and South Dakota games when Angel and Tay didn't play because of injuries to get a picture of how next year might look. But we still had Rodney to play.

The new guards better be able to play well right away. Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

we were 22-12 (9-7) in the 08-09 season. I think (with the b12 being so down next year) we should have a comparable record to that season, so i'll buy 22-13... livin life on the bubble all year.

'08 had Jake, Denis, Curt, Jamar, and Dom. 

'13 Sprads, Shane, Gip, Whothefuckcares, whothefuckcares

 

Would take a jersey of the last guy you mentioned

[lopakman]

I bet oscar's motion offense is the cure for cancer.  Is there anything it can't do?

Call a timeout with less than 10 seconds left in a NCAA tourney game.    oscar!  Thanks for opening up old wounds.

[orangerocket]

Get ready for some serious Bruceketball next year...pass pass pass stand around...pass pass pass...stand...pass....3.2.1....chuck a three...

[owl borland]

Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Yeah, that's a dumb point. All you have to do is look at the UMKC and South Dakota games when Angel and Tay didn't play because of injuries to get a picture of how next year might look. But we still had Rodney to play.

The new guards better be able to play well right away. Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

we were 22-12 (9-7) in the 08-09 season. I think (with the b12 being so down next year) we should have a comparable record to that season, so i'll buy 22-13... livin life on the bubble all year.

'08 had Jake, Denis, Curt, Jamar, and Dom. 

'13 Sprads, Shane, Gip, Whothefuckcares, whothefuckcares

 

[CNS]

Guys, didn't Will play in the motion offense last year?  Weird that it didn't hide his inability last yr.

Huh.

Yeah, that's a dumb point. All you have to do is look at the UMKC and South Dakota games when Angel and Tay didn't play because of injuries to get a picture of how next year might look. But we still had Rodney to play.

The new guards better be able to play well right away. Stan's 22-13 seems pretty bold.

we were 22-12 (9-7) in the 08-09 season. I think (with the b12 being so down next year) we should have a comparable record to that season, so i'll buy 22-13... livin life on the bubble all year.

'08 had Jake, Denis, Curt, Jamar, and Dom. 

'13 Sprads, Shane, Gip, Whothefuckcares, whothefuckcares

 

[Mr Bread]

Get ready for some serious Bruceketball next year...pass pass pass stand around...pass pass pass...stand...pass....3.2.1....chuck a three...

oscar's motion has proven time and time again that it doesn't need some fancy pants ball-handler point guard to thrive.  It transcends the concept of point guards.  Crisp ball movement and spacing.  It's like you've never watched a second of oscar's motion.  Least important player on the floor at all times in oscar's motion?  Point guard.  It works better when you don't have some dork that likes to run around slapping the ball off the floor all the time. 

[chum1]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

[pissclams]

oscar makes a living during the summers teaching vivid entertainment what crisp ball movement is all about.

[Mr Bread]

oscar makes a living during the summers teaching vivid entertainment what crisp ball movement is all about.

buh-zing

[kougar24]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

[chum1]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

[michigancat]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

[chum1]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

Sure thing NIT vs. sure thing NCAA?  That seems to be what's being implied here.  That's nuts.   

[michigancat]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

Sure thing NIT vs. sure thing NCAA?  That seems to be what's being implied here.  That's nuts.   

I think it's sure thing NCAA vs. bubble NCAA. It's a very reasonable objective observation.

[kougar24]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

Sure thing NIT vs. sure thing NCAA?  That seems to be what's being implied here.  That's nuts.   

Mid-to-lower NCAA seed vs. NIT shoo-in isn't "nuts" when talking about the presence vs. absence of your veteran all-conference PG.

[Dr Rick Daris]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

Sure thing NIT vs. sure thing NCAA?  That seems to be what's being implied here.  That's nuts.

he was second team all league and first team defense at the most important position on the court and one that we were rail thin at to begin with. i'd say he was pretty important.

[chum1]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

Sure thing NIT vs. sure thing NCAA?  That seems to be what's being implied here.  That's nuts.   

I think it's sure thing NCAA vs. bubble NCAA. It's a very reasonable objective observation.

I was reponding to people who were explicitly stating NIT (which I take to exclude bubble).

[chum1]

NIT?  What's the projection with Angel?  He's not THAT valuable.

Oh, but he is.

There are very few players, if any, who have that big of an impact on a team's performace. 

Angel, on this team, is one of them.

Sure thing NIT vs. sure thing NCAA?  That seems to be what's being implied here.  That's nuts.

he was second team all league and first team defense at the most important position on the court and one that we were rail thin at to begin with. i'd say he was pretty important.

No doubt, but this seems more like the usual, "OMG WE'LL BE mumped WITHOUT OUR STAR PLAYER WHO IS GRADUATING" type of overreaction.  There's always some unexpected new player that comes along.

[michigancat]

This reminds me a lot of when Dez left and Fred Peete stepped up.

Or when Nick Williams left and Jarret Hart and Timmy Ellis eased our pain. always someone unexpected.