Author Topic: Stan Talks about Angel (Read 27864 times)

kougar24 · « **Reply #50 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:11:30 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 01:09:45 PM

This reminds me a lot of when Dez left and Fred Peete stepped up.

Or when Nick Williams left and Jarret Hart and Timmy Ellis eased our pain. always someone unexpected.

pissclams · « **Reply #51 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:12:31 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 01:09:45 PM

This reminds me a lot of when Dez left and Fred Peete stepped up.

Or when Nick Williams left and Jarret Hart and Timmy Ellis eased our pain. always someone unexpected.

shane southwell for jamar!

michigancat · « **Reply #52 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:15:32 PM »

And who can forget Mario Taybron filling the void left by Peete. He beat KU!

chum1 · « **Reply #53 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:17:37 PM »

You're saying those teams suffered a dramatic drop off from one year to the next?

michigancat · « **Reply #54 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:18:15 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 01:17:37 PM

You're saying those teams suffered a dramatic drop off from one year to the next?

I'm agreeing w/ you.

kso_FAN · « **Reply #55 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:19:53 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 01:15:32 PM

And who can forget Mario Taybron filling the void left by Peete. He beat KU!

Its just so cyclical; Nick Williams stepped in to fill the chasm caused by Richie Terry's sudden departure.

pissclams · « **Reply #56 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:19:56 PM »

imagine if santa monica's own, keith amerson, wasn't there to step into steve fritz's shoes

chum1 · « **Reply #57 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:20:46 PM »

Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 01:18:15 PM

Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 01:17:37 PM
You're saying those teams suffered a dramatic drop off from one year to the next?

I'm agreeing w/ you.

I initially thought so, but couldn't escape the conditioning that you were somehow being a smart ass.

CHONGS · « **Reply #58 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:22:30 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 01:20:46 PM

Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 01:17:37 PM
You're saying those teams suffered a dramatic drop off from one year to the next?

I'm agreeing w/ you.

I initially thought so, but couldn't escape the conditioning that you were somehow being a smart ass.

I :lol:ed

michigancat · « **Reply #59 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:24:10 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 01:20:46 PM

Quote from: michigancat on April 23, 2013, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 01:17:37 PM
You're saying those teams suffered a dramatic drop off from one year to the next?

I'm agreeing w/ you.

I initially thought so, but couldn't escape the conditioning that you were somehow being a smart ass.

Yeha, the only season that was noticeably worse was going from Nick Williams to Jarret Hart/Frank Richards. Went from 6-10 to 4-12. Two conference games could definitely be the difference between NCAA lock and bubble for sure. Obviously there's lots of factors involved beyond replacing a single player. (fun fact I discovered in my research: Wooly was only sub-.500 in 3 of 6 seasons!)

catzacker · « **Reply #60 on:** April 23, 2013, 01:46:28 PM »

It's not only sprads (or some freshman) stepping in for angel but also shane stepping in for mcgruds. I have a hard time seeing both happen.

kougar24 · « **Reply #61 on:** April 23, 2013, 02:30:30 PM »

Quote from: catzacker on April 23, 2013, 01:46:28 PM

It's not only sprads (or some freshman) stepping in for angel but also shane stepping in for mcgruds. I have a hard time seeing ~~both~~ either happen.

Pett · « **Reply #62 on:** April 23, 2013, 02:45:53 PM »

EMAPE needs to go off next season

kougar24 · « **Reply #63 on:** April 23, 2013, 02:49:32 PM »

Quote from: Pett on April 23, 2013, 02:45:53 PM

EMAPE needs to go off...

...the team?

Pett · « **Reply #64 on:** April 23, 2013, 03:15:51 PM »

Quote from: kougar24 on April 23, 2013, 02:49:32 PM

Quote from: Pett on April 23, 2013, 02:45:53 PM
EMAPE needs to go off...

...the team?

No, statistically.

steve dave · « **Reply #65 on:** April 23, 2013, 03:16:23 PM »

Quote from: Pett on April 23, 2013, 03:15:51 PM

Quote from: kougar24 on April 23, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
Quote from: Pett on April 23, 2013, 02:45:53 PM
EMAPE needs to go off...

...the team?
No, statistically.

well, I mean...he won't

kougar24 · « **Reply #66 on:** April 23, 2013, 04:39:27 PM »

Quote from: steve dave on April 23, 2013, 03:16:23 PM

Quote from: Pett on April 23, 2013, 03:15:51 PM
Quote from: kougar24 on April 23, 2013, 02:49:32 PM
Quote from: Pett on April 23, 2013, 02:45:53 PM
EMAPE needs to go off...

...the team?
No, statistically.

well, I mean...he won't

Yeah, let's step back and acknowledge the fact that we're discussing Omari Lawrence needing to "go off" for us next year.

deputy dawg · « **Reply #67 on:** April 23, 2013, 04:44:17 PM »

Quote

it doesn't need some fancy pants ball-handler point guard

Can't believe everyone missed this, which is why we won't miss Angel.

Mr Bread · « **Reply #68 on:** April 23, 2013, 05:12:38 PM »

Quote from: deputy dawg on April 23, 2013, 04:44:17 PM

Quote
it doesn't need some fancy pants ball-handler point guard

Can't believe everyone missed this, which is why we won't miss Angel.

Quote from: me

It works better when you don't have some dork that likes to run around slapping the ball off the floor all the time.

This was the funnier part. Obviously.

Dr Rick Daris · « **Reply #69 on:** April 23, 2013, 07:41:14 PM »

Quote from: Mr Bread on April 23, 2013, 05:12:38 PM

Quote from: deputy dawg on April 23, 2013, 04:44:17 PM
Quote
it doesn't need some fancy pants ball-handler point guard

Can't believe everyone missed this, which is why we won't miss Angel.

Quote from: me
It works better when you don't have some dork that likes to run around slapping the ball off the floor all the time.

This was the funnier part. Obviously.

they were both good.

Mr Bread · « **Reply #70 on:** April 23, 2013, 08:00:38 PM »

ELL3 · « **Reply #71 on:** April 23, 2013, 08:12:09 PM »

will we beat South Carolina in the NIT?

Powercat Posse · « **Reply #72 on:** April 23, 2013, 09:27:07 PM »

Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 12:17:15 PM

NIT? What's the projection with Angel? He's not THAT valuable.

My thoughts 2-3 weeks ago were 24-25 wins and being a 6 seed entering NCAA Tourney. Now, I think a 11-12 seed is a realistic goal for an optimist.

Lucas Scoopsalot · « **Reply #73 on:** April 23, 2013, 11:39:18 PM »

Quote from: Powercat Posse on April 23, 2013, 09:27:07 PM

Quote from: chum1 on April 23, 2013, 12:17:15 PM
NIT? What's the projection with Angel? He's not THAT valuable.

My thoughts 2-3 weeks ago were 24-25 wins and being a 6 seed entering NCAA Tourney. Now, I think a 11-12 seed is a realistic goal for an optimist.

I always thought of myself as an optimist, but I guess I'm not.

MakeItRain · « **Reply #74 on:** April 23, 2013, 11:40:29 PM »

Quote from: ELL3 on April 23, 2013, 08:12:09 PM

will we beat South Carolina in the NIT?

If we played South Carolina in the NIT it will absolutely be the first time, and hopefully the last, since I became a wildcat that I will actively root against K-State.