Author Topic: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)  (Read 8123 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« on: March 16, 2013, 09:38:16 PM »
http://www.encyclonepedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/fouls-margins-margin.jpg

Shows that we actually get less of a home advantage, fouls-wise, than any other team in the Big XII.

And if you look more closely at the total fouls called against/fouls called against opponent, you'll see further evidence that there is no grand conspiracy against the rest of the Big XII. Sometimes it's hard to admit it when you just get outplayed. You guys really did have a good season though and you should be proud of it. Best of luck in the tourney (unless we meet again).

Rock Chalk


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2013, 09:39:24 PM »
don't click. virus.

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2013, 09:40:10 PM »
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2013, 09:43:17 PM »
not sure you know how to chart .jpg
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2013, 09:43:50 PM »
not sure you know how to chart .jpg

Not my chart .jpg
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2013, 09:44:23 PM »
Interesting... Still think there are too many factors involved to say we're getting hosed, though.
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2013, 09:46:28 PM »
I found a chart too guys:

Teams that get every call:
Kansas

Teams that always get screwed always:
Kansas State


Offline kim carnes

  • chingon!
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13843
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2013, 09:48:19 PM »
the eyes don't lie.  KU gets all the calls

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2013, 09:49:30 PM »
The fact you were compelled to come here to post this bogus crap is revealing.
You needn't feel bad. Your team gets all the calls (i.e. 13 plus minutes in the first half before getting a whistle and it charged to the wrong player). If it were my team, I'd keep my head down and just enjoy.

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2013, 09:50:31 PM »
this is relevant in the same way that gross FG% is relevant
emaw

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38011
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2013, 09:51:11 PM »
so.....did anyone watch the game tonight?

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2013, 09:51:28 PM »
My goodness I've never met such a butthurt bunch of fans.

There are certainly worse fans in the world. But you guys really can't handle defeat graciously.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2013, 09:52:25 PM »
The fact you were compelled to come here to post this bogus crap is revealing.
You needn't feel bad. Your team gets all the calls (i.e. 13 plus minutes in the first half before getting a whistle and it charged to the wrong player). If it were my team, I'd keep my head down and just enjoy.

Was curious how you guys were reacting. Saw a bunch of blame shifting. Decided to pass on some actual evidence. Turns out you guys just want to rant and rave and feel like victims. Color me shocked.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2013, 09:53:43 PM »
Trying a little hard here. As I said, keep your head down and hope no one notices.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2013, 09:54:09 PM »
My goodness I've never met such a butthurt bunch of fans.

There are certainly worse fans in the world. But you guys really can't handle defeat graciously.

"butthurt"

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2013, 09:55:19 PM »
My goodness I've never met such a butthurt bunch of fans.

There are certainly worse fans in the world. But you guys really can't handle defeat graciously.

"butthurt"

Is that a swear word too? Does that also offend your sensibilities, Nancy?
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2013, 09:56:18 PM »
Dip crap did you even read the chart or did you just look at the pretty colors?
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2013, 09:57:20 PM »
My goodness I've never met such a butthurt bunch of fans.

There are certainly worse fans in the world. But you guys really can't handle defeat graciously.

"butthurt"

Is that a swear word too? Does that also offend your sensibilities, Nancy?

"Nancy"

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2013, 09:57:34 PM »
The fact you were compelled to come here to post this bogus crap is revealing.
You needn't feel bad. Your team gets all the calls (i.e. 13 plus minutes in the first half before getting a whistle and it charged to the wrong player). If it were my team, I'd keep my head down and just enjoy.

Was curious how you guys were reacting. Saw a bunch of blame shifting. Decided to pass on some actual evidence. Turns out you guys just want to rant and rave and feel like victims. Color me shocked.

you lost to tcu.  lolz
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2013, 09:58:17 PM »
The fact you were compelled to come here to post this bogus crap is revealing.
You needn't feel bad. Your team gets all the calls (i.e. 13 plus minutes in the first half before getting a whistle and it charged to the wrong player). If it were my team, I'd keep my head down and just enjoy.

Was curious how you guys were reacting. Saw a bunch of blame shifting. Decided to pass on some actual evidence. Turns out you guys just want to rant and rave and feel like victims. Color me shocked.

you lost to tcu.  lolz

And yet you couldn't beat us. Not in Lawrence. Not in KC. Not even in Manhattan. Think about that.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline doom

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3622
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2013, 10:00:24 PM »
You should think about it.  You tied in conference to a  team you beat 3 times.  that isn't our fault.  We didn't make you lose to osu, ou, Baylor, and tcu.  And it won't be our fault when you lose in the tourney. 
“They said something along the lines of ‘it kind of sounds like you’d be interested in it.’ And I said ‘hell yeah I am. Why not?’” -Doug Gottlieb

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2013, 10:00:56 PM »
You should forward this to Musberger. He seemed to agree that the refs were sucking KU off tonight.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2013, 10:01:15 PM »
The fact you were compelled to come here to post this bogus crap is revealing.
You needn't feel bad. Your team gets all the calls (i.e. 13 plus minutes in the first half before getting a whistle and it charged to the wrong player). If it were my team, I'd keep my head down and just enjoy.

go watch that foul again :)
everyone is jealous

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27688
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #23 on: March 16, 2013, 10:02:08 PM »
The fact you were compelled to come here to post this bogus crap is revealing.
You needn't feel bad. Your team gets all the calls (i.e. 13 plus minutes in the first half before getting a whistle and it charged to the wrong player). If it were my team, I'd keep my head down and just enjoy.

Was curious how you guys were reacting. Saw a bunch of blame shifting. Decided to pass on some actual evidence. Turns out you guys just want to rant and rave and feel like victims. Color me shocked.

you lost to tcu.  lolz

And yet you couldn't beat us. Not in Lawrence. Not in KC. Not even in Manhattan. Think about that.

Think about that

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #24 on: March 16, 2013, 10:02:46 PM »
You should forward this to Musberger. He seemed to agree that the refs were sucking KU off tonight.

Musberger doesn't know his d*ck from a zit on Spradling's face. His opinion doesn't mean a whole lot. I'll take the stats.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!