Author Topic: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)  (Read 8266 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #25 on: March 16, 2013, 10:04:27 PM »
dip crap....9 fouls. Now look at your season averages.  Please remove head from rectum.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #26 on: March 16, 2013, 10:08:22 PM »
I guess we should be thanking him for substantiating we all knew we witnessed; it's the fact the moron thinks it says something else is   :facepalm:

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #27 on: March 16, 2013, 10:11:18 PM »
dip crap....9 fouls. Now look at your season averages.  Please remove head from rectum.

Can you even explain what other fouls should have been called on us tonight? Really, you guys weren't playing offense in such a way that we should have gotten many. We played a pretty clean game.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #28 on: March 16, 2013, 10:12:07 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #29 on: March 16, 2013, 10:13:53 PM »
dip crap....9 fouls. Now look at your season averages.  Please remove head from rectum.

Can you even explain what other fouls should have been called on us tonight? Really, you guys weren't playing offense in such a way that we should have gotten many. We played a pretty clean game.
Dude the first foul called on Rodney was him hitting Withey on the elbow with his head!  In every other league that is over the back on Whitey.  Once again Whitey had a foul removed from him and placed to a roll player (I think Tharpe's first).  Just stop your blatant homer-ism and watch a game.  Try to mentally focus on it for just one game.  These refs are down right incompetent and consistently favor KU. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #30 on: March 16, 2013, 10:14:26 PM »
http://statsheet.com/mcb/conferences/big-12/fouls

More stats illustrating my point. KU doesn't get some huge boost and everyone else doesn't get railed. So much of it is dependent on style of play and individual players.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #31 on: March 16, 2013, 10:15:00 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.

who in particular around here was blaming the loss on the refs?  TIA.

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #32 on: March 16, 2013, 10:15:52 PM »
dip crap....9 fouls. Now look at your season averages.  Please remove head from rectum.

Can you even explain what other fouls should have been called on us tonight? Really, you guys weren't playing offense in such a way that we should have gotten many. We played a pretty clean game.
Dude the first foul called on Rodney was him hitting Withey on the elbow with his head!  In every other league that is over the back on Whitey.  Once again Whitey had a foul removed from him and placed to a roll player (I think Tharpe's first).  Just stop your blatant homer-ism and watch a game.  Try to mentally focus on it for just one game.  These refs are down right incompetent and consistently favor KU.

For one, you're being silly complaining about that. Secondly, you just yelled about one foul. If it had been called on the Hawks, you'd still be crying.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #33 on: March 16, 2013, 10:16:19 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.

who in particular around here was blaming the loss on the refs?  TIA.

There was an entire thread devoted to it.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #34 on: March 16, 2013, 10:17:21 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13891
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #35 on: March 16, 2013, 10:17:45 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.

who in particular around here was blaming the loss on the refs?  TIA.

There was an entire thread devoted to it.
this one?

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #36 on: March 16, 2013, 10:18:20 PM »
He know this but doesn't want to acknowledge it. So he came to our little corner of the Internets and posted stats that he doesn't even understand mostly because he's a dickhead.

dip crap....9 fouls. Now look at your season averages.  Please remove head from rectum.

Can you even explain what other fouls should have been called on us tonight? Really, you guys weren't playing offense in such a way that we should have gotten many. We played a pretty clean game.
Dude the first foul called on Rodney was him hitting Withey on the elbow with his head!  In every other league that is over the back on Whitey.  Once again Whitey had a foul removed from him and placed to a roll player (I think Tharpe's first).  Just stop your blatant homer-ism and watch a game.  Try to mentally focus on it for just one game.  These refs are down right incompetent and consistently favor KU.

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #37 on: March 16, 2013, 10:19:40 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.

who in particular around here was blaming the loss on the refs?  TIA.

There was an entire thread devoted to it.

well there's a bunch of threads where we blame our coach and players. like, lots and lots.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #38 on: March 16, 2013, 10:20:14 PM »
Quote
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.
He's incapable of understanding a simple chart. Don't try to get him to wrap his limited little skull around that concept.

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #39 on: March 16, 2013, 10:21:18 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

They aren't mutually exclusive events. But the refs weren't that bad. It's funny how the losing team almost always has something to say about the refs. You guys played like sh*t. I agree.

But if you want to talk about mutually exclusive events, how about you explain why you believe that State playing poorly and KU playing great defense are mutually exclusive.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #40 on: March 16, 2013, 10:22:23 PM »
Lawrencejmhawk

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #41 on: March 16, 2013, 10:28:35 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

They aren't mutually exclusive events. But the refs weren't that bad. It's funny how the losing team almost always has something to say about the refs. You guys played like sh*t. I agree.

But if you want to talk about mutually exclusive events, how about you explain why you believe that State playing poorly and KU playing great defense are mutually exclusive.
KU absolutely did play great defense. I don't see anyone on here arguing that they didn't. However, arguing that they committed no fouls prior to us committing six is ridiculous.  Examples provided by others in this thread. Look, I understand that it is hard to comprehend that you are getting preferential treatment whenever you've experienced it for as long as you can remember. It still doesn't make it any less true that it occurs, as demonstrated by the chart you posted here.

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #42 on: March 16, 2013, 10:29:57 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

They aren't mutually exclusive events. But the refs weren't that bad. It's funny how the losing team almost always has something to say about the refs. You guys played like sh*t. I agree.

But if you want to talk about mutually exclusive events, how about you explain why you believe that State playing poorly and KU playing great defense are mutually exclusive.
KU absolutely did play great defense. I don't see anyone on here arguing that they didn't. However, arguing that they committed no fouls prior to us committing six is ridiculous.  Examples provided by others in this thread. Look, I understand that it is hard to comprehend that you are getting preferential treatment whenever you've experienced it for as long as you can remember. It still doesn't make it any less true that it occurs, as demonstrated by the chart you posted here.

Thanks for giving a bit of credit where credit is due. Perhaps we should have had a foul or two by the time you had six, but you were just committing them at a much higher rate than we were. Any ref with eyes could see that.

To the rest of your post:  :facepalm:
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #43 on: March 16, 2013, 10:31:04 PM »
Lawrencejmhawk

I remember a period of 10+ minutes in the first half where Kstate didn't make a FG and u want to blame refs?
everyone is jealous

Offline timhawk

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1929
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #44 on: March 16, 2013, 10:32:09 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

They aren't mutually exclusive events. But the refs weren't that bad. It's funny how the losing team almost always has something to say about the refs. You guys played like sh*t. I agree.

But if you want to talk about mutually exclusive events, how about you explain why you believe that State playing poorly and KU playing great defense are mutually exclusive.
KU absolutely did play great defense. I don't see anyone on here arguing that they didn't. However, arguing that they committed no fouls prior to us committing six is ridiculous.  Examples provided by others in this thread. Look, I understand that it is hard to comprehend that you are getting preferential treatment whenever you've experienced it for as long as you can remember. It still doesn't make it any less true that it occurs, as demonstrated by the chart you posted here.

Thanks for giving a bit of credit where credit is due. Perhaps we should have had a foul or two by the time you had six, but you were just committing them at a much higher rate than we were. Any ref with eyes could see that.

To the rest of your post:  :facepalm:

exactly! Rock Chalk TITLETOWN Jayhawk!
everyone is jealous

Offline yoman

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1213
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #45 on: March 16, 2013, 10:32:31 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

They aren't mutually exclusive events. But the refs weren't that bad. It's funny how the losing team almost always has something to say about the refs. You guys played like sh*t. I agree.

But if you want to talk about mutually exclusive events, how about you explain why you believe that State playing poorly and KU playing great defense are mutually exclusive.
KU absolutely did play great defense. I don't see anyone on here arguing that they didn't. However, arguing that they committed no fouls prior to us committing six is ridiculous.  Examples provided by others in this thread. Look, I understand that it is hard to comprehend that you are getting preferential treatment whenever you've experienced it for as long as you can remember. It still doesn't make it any less true that it occurs, as demonstrated by the chart you posted here.

Thanks for giving a bit of credit where credit is due. Perhaps we should have had a foul or two by the time you had six, but you were just committing them at a much higher rate than we were. Any ref with eyes could see that.

To the rest of your post:  :facepalm:
So while dismissing my post you actually confirmed my point that you were receiving preferential treatment. Nice work.  At least you're on the road to recovery, the first step is admittance.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 38108
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #46 on: March 16, 2013, 10:34:22 PM »
Oh, we definitely lost this one with poor shooting.  We had tons of good open shots.  Tons, and missed them like crazy.  That is a diff discussion though.

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #47 on: March 16, 2013, 10:38:38 PM »
On another note though..why? Why do you guys ALWAYS go to the refs instead of just accepting that you lost to a better team? It's just asinine.
It's asinine that you believe that us playing a shitty game and officials favoring KU are mutually exclusive events. Both occurred tonight.

They aren't mutually exclusive events. But the refs weren't that bad. It's funny how the losing team almost always has something to say about the refs. You guys played like sh*t. I agree.

But if you want to talk about mutually exclusive events, how about you explain why you believe that State playing poorly and KU playing great defense are mutually exclusive.
KU absolutely did play great defense. I don't see anyone on here arguing that they didn't. However, arguing that they committed no fouls prior to us committing six is ridiculous.  Examples provided by others in this thread. Look, I understand that it is hard to comprehend that you are getting preferential treatment whenever you've experienced it for as long as you can remember. It still doesn't make it any less true that it occurs, as demonstrated by the chart you posted here.

Thanks for giving a bit of credit where credit is due. Perhaps we should have had a foul or two by the time you had six, but you were just committing them at a much higher rate than we were. Any ref with eyes could see that.

To the rest of your post:  :facepalm:
So while dismissing my post you actually confirmed my point that you were receiving preferential treatment. Nice work.  At least you're on the road to recovery, the first step is admittance.

Nope. Dismissed the idiotic bits. Admitted that calls can be missed. Refs aren't infallible. Everyone knows that. You guys could have had another one by that point or one less. We could have had one or two. Officiating isn't a perfect science. It requires judgment calls, just like umpiring. No preferential treatment.

Tell me--because I truly don't know--do NC State fans act this way toward Duke or Carolina? Do SEC teams' fans act this way towards Kentucky? Do they too not understand that they are just consistently overmatched, or are they more realistic, admit that it isn't them against the world?
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!

Offline Cartierfor3

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 27692
  • I just want us all to be buds.
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #48 on: March 16, 2013, 10:40:02 PM »
Lawrence which goEMAW.com poster or thread, specifically, are you referring to who blames our loss on the refs?

Offline Lawrence

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Foul Statistics (that's right--something substantiated)
« Reply #49 on: March 16, 2013, 10:43:43 PM »
Lawrence which goEMAW.com poster or thread, specifically, are you referring to who blames our loss on the refs?

Including, but not limited to, the gems within the "5 fouls to zip" thread. I understand what you're doing. You want to make the point that I can't, from memory, tell you the names of all the whiny posters. But I usually browse this forum for a few minutes when we play you guys and it's usually pretty complain-y. Tonight was a special kind of dumb though; I felt compelled to post.
1922 * 1923 * 1940 * 1952 * 1953 * 1957 * 1971 * 1974 * 1986 * 1988 * 1991 * 1993 * 2002 * 2003 * 2008 * 2012

Rock Chalk Jayhawk, Go KU!