and i didn't appreciate you trying to dlew the thread and say that what we were doing was exactly the same thing as gpc but the opposite when we weren't. and no we're not splittling hairs. not even close.
i think we are splitting hairs. you're right. this isn't the inverse of the GPC response where they defend spradling and trash JO, but it's not that far off. the reason people aren't rushing to JO's defense yet is because this just happened. that's why originally asked the question: "Conversely, is goEMAW going to bitch about JO's mom and how JO's a pussy because he can't handle whatever it is he's upset about?"
and let me preface this by saying that I loved Frank and I hated the oscar hire just so we're all clear. Also, i agree that the GPC response to the Sprads/JO complaining is ridiculous and inconsistent.
i don't take issue with JO's mom complaining just like i don't really take issue with Spradling's parents complaining. however, i could definitely understand how people could feel like sprads needed to shut up and play and how jo needs to do the same now. But the players/parents don't determine how the AD responds. Like some one alluded to earlier in this thread, parents probably complain about this crap all the time, and it's the AD's job to say "yeah, i understand. don't worry we're looking out for your son and all of our student athletes, etc." Currie used what is probably a common occurrence as leverage over a coach he hated. Don't we pretty much think that the "players are going to transfer" jazz was just a pretext for Currie hating Frank's guts anyways? This is
all on Currie.
I don't think it's fair or consistent to crap on Sprads for being a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie just so happened to use as one of his reasons for firing Frank) and not consider JO a pussy when he complains about a coach (which Currie doesn't respond to).