Author Topic: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!  (Read 20904 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85527
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« on: November 06, 2012, 10:44:08 AM »
 :excited:


(Want to get rid of the ad? Register now for free!)

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19134
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2012, 10:45:15 AM »
:adios:

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36812
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2012, 10:45:44 AM »
Is this about who is the most pud still?  I mean, can we just declare one of these the Official Master Thread and declare Daris the winner already?

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42037
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2012, 10:47:51 AM »
Fluoride.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2012, 10:51:35 AM »
I voted yes on taxing people who buy cigarettes to fund $200+ million in education.

Seemed like a win/win.

Offline Unruly

  • Oh so Unruly.
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2703
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2012, 10:54:29 AM »
 :thumbs:
:dance:


Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37189
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2012, 10:56:05 AM »
Undecided voter here.

Can anybody tell me anything about the boat tax question on the ballot? Just how outrageous are boat taxes in Kansas, and would lowering them defund anything important? Would my taxes as a non-boat owner be affected if the boat tax gets lowered? tia.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20541
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #7 on: November 06, 2012, 10:56:17 AM »
haven't voted yet.  Jill Stein isn't on the ballot, so looks like Obama for me.

Other elections with two candidates:

Hawk
Phillips
Viar
Boyd
No on all Judges

Unopposed:
no vote on Hueselkamp
yes on vargo, king, regester
no vote on wilkerson

special issues:
NO vote on watercraft property exemption
YES on .5% Sales Tax

Offline 0.42

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7746
  • pasghetti
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #8 on: November 06, 2012, 10:57:42 AM »
I voted for my town to acquire 70 acres of additional parkland :dance:

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #9 on: November 06, 2012, 10:59:18 AM »
i voted to keep a part of the oklahoma tax code that charges tax on logos, certificates, and other random stuff.  eff you, give us money.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20541
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #10 on: November 06, 2012, 11:00:08 AM »
Undecided voter here.

Can anybody tell me anything about the boat tax question on the ballot? Just how outrageous are boat taxes in Kansas, and would lowering them defund anything important? Would my taxes as a non-boat owner be affected if the boat tax gets lowered? tia.

YES vote allows lower taxes on boats.  A lot of people seem to think that this would actually increase revenue in Kansas as many people register their boats in other states, but I'm a little dubious.
NO vote means boats are taxed like all other property.

I don't have strong feelings either way, but I would prefer not to give boat owners a tax cut without overwhelming evidence that this increases revenue.

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37189
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #11 on: November 06, 2012, 11:01:33 AM »
Undecided voter here.

Can anybody tell me anything about the boat tax question on the ballot? Just how outrageous are boat taxes in Kansas, and would lowering them defund anything important? Would my taxes as a non-boat owner be affected if the boat tax gets lowered? tia.

YES vote allows lower taxes on boats.  A lot of people seem to think that this would actually increase revenue in Kansas as many people register their boats in other states, but I'm a little dubious.
NO vote means boats are taxed like all other property.

I don't have strong feelings either way, but I would prefer not to give boat owners a tax cut without overwhelming evidence that this increases revenue.

Thanks. I had been leaning toward no.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36812
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #12 on: November 06, 2012, 11:03:24 AM »
I voted yes on taxing people who buy cigarettes to fund $200+ million in education.

Seemed like a win/win.

They are just going to take the original $200M that went to schools, and use this new $200M for schools so that schools still receive nothing more than $200M, but every politician involved will get a new boat/

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #13 on: November 06, 2012, 11:05:08 AM »
Undecided voter here.

Can anybody tell me anything about the boat tax question on the ballot? Just how outrageous are boat taxes in Kansas, and would lowering them defund anything important? Would my taxes as a non-boat owner be affected if the boat tax gets lowered? tia.

YES vote allows lower taxes on boats.  A lot of people seem to think that this would actually increase revenue in Kansas as many people register their boats in other states, but I'm a little dubious.
NO vote means boats are taxed like all other property.

I don't have strong feelings either way, but I would prefer not to give boat owners a tax cut without overwhelming evidence that this increases revenue.

Seriously, how many taxable boats are there in the state of Kansas. If this was a coastal state I could understand. I am voting yes to help allow flexibility in the tax policy on boats.
RIP Fatty

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37189
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #14 on: November 06, 2012, 11:07:04 AM »
I voted yes on taxing people who buy cigarettes to fund $200+ million in education.

Seemed like a win/win.

They are just going to take the original $200M that went to schools, and use this new $200M for schools so that schools still receive nothing more than $200M, but every politician involved will get a new boat/

Yeah, it's bullshit. They probably will not even have to pay taxes on the boats.

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36812
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #15 on: November 06, 2012, 11:07:32 AM »
Undecided voter here.

Can anybody tell me anything about the boat tax question on the ballot? Just how outrageous are boat taxes in Kansas, and would lowering them defund anything important? Would my taxes as a non-boat owner be affected if the boat tax gets lowered? tia.

YES vote allows lower taxes on boats.  A lot of people seem to think that this would actually increase revenue in Kansas as many people register their boats in other states, but I'm a little dubious.
NO vote means boats are taxed like all other property.

I don't have strong feelings either way, but I would prefer not to give boat owners a tax cut without overwhelming evidence that this increases revenue.

Paranoid side of me thinks that there is something else this bill that allows the gov to do something unrelated  and that they are using boats to get it through.  Otherwise, why pass something for boats.  I mean, who give a eff about boats in KS? 

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85527
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2012, 11:07:50 AM »
write in vote for even higher taxes on votes for me

Offline The1BigWillie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3172
  • Known to be a horrible person... (BORN 7/4/75)
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #17 on: November 06, 2012, 11:09:22 AM »
I voted for Pedro...

"That's what you get when you let some dude from Los Angles/Texas with the alias Mookfu raw dog it.  Willesgirl can back me up here.  There's a lesson in this.  You only get HIV once; make it count." - Mr. Bread

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #18 on: November 06, 2012, 11:09:52 AM »
since jill stein isnt on the ballot, i guess it will be gary johnson

no on the tax thing cause it just makes taxes even more complicated

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37189
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #19 on: November 06, 2012, 11:10:33 AM »
Seriously, how many taxable boats are there in the state of Kansas. If this was a coastal state I could understand. I am voting yes to help allow flexibility in the tax policy on boats.

about 85,000

Offline "storm"nut

  • SOCK (outed by The Laundromat)
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3004
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #20 on: November 06, 2012, 11:13:37 AM »
Seriously, how many taxable boats are there in the state of Kansas. If this was a coastal state I could understand. I am voting yes to help allow flexibility in the tax policy on boats.

about 85,000

so not that many, got it.
RIP Fatty

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37189
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #21 on: November 06, 2012, 11:14:46 AM »
Seriously, how many taxable boats are there in the state of Kansas. If this was a coastal state I could understand. I am voting yes to help allow flexibility in the tax policy on boats.

about 85,000

so not that many, got it.

That accounts for $63.75 million.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20541
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #22 on: November 06, 2012, 11:16:10 AM »
Seriously, how many taxable boats are there in the state of Kansas. If this was a coastal state I could understand. I am voting yes to help allow flexibility in the tax policy on boats.

about 85,000

so not that many, got it.

Clearly someone has never enjoyed the beauty of an afternoon at one of Kansas' finest man-made lakes.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44995
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #23 on: November 06, 2012, 11:18:06 AM »
Fluoride.

hell yes, I also voted to keep boat owners paying like a million percent in property tax, eff boats




sorry boat owners :cry:

Offline EMAWican

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1202
  • 'Murica
    • View Profile
Re: Post In This Thread Who You Voted For!
« Reply #24 on: November 06, 2012, 11:18:40 AM »
Approximately 10,000 watercraft are registered in the surrounding states to Kansas residents to avoid the 30% property tax rule.  Watercraft includes boats, jet-skis, canoes, sailboats, etc. Drive around a marina or place that stores boats and see how many tags are Kansas.  I think it's pathetic that if I signed a waiver saying I operated the boat over 50% of the time in Oklahoma that I would save $1,500 bucks a year.