Author Topic: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme  (Read 14382 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #25 on: September 26, 2012, 02:14:34 PM »
_Fan, have a question.  As it relates to our defense, can you explain why we couldn’t/didn’t/had a hard time adjusting to OU’s set where they lined up in shotgun set with the RB off set to the right, w/ twins to each side..motioned the RB to the side (moving AB with him)…the inside receiver(s) run a seam route or deep out, the outside receiver(s) runs a delay underneath but always stops outside of the hash.  We kinda got destroyed on this nearly every time they ran it.  I wasn’t sure why we couldn’t make the adjustment or what those routes were doing to our secondary that made it so difficult to adjust. 

Can you post a link to an example from youtube? I'd like to look at it. Honestly, I'm more in tune with offense because I know more on that side of the ball, but I would be interested in looking at what you are talking about.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #26 on: September 26, 2012, 02:15:15 PM »
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

We went empty 5 times vs Miami.

Were they all 4 x 1?  I remember thinking at the time that I don't remember seeing that last year.

I think they were 3 x 2, but I'd have to go back and look.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46510
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #27 on: September 26, 2012, 02:18:38 PM »
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19132
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #28 on: September 26, 2012, 02:21:57 PM »
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

We went empty 5 times vs Miami.

Were they all 4 x 1?  I remember thinking at the time that I don't remember seeing that last year.

I think they were 3 x 2, but I'd have to go back and look.

No need to... I know at least 1 when we were heading to the north endzone (first quarter?) was 4 x 1.  Not worth going back to check on the others.
:adios:

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #29 on: September 26, 2012, 02:34:35 PM »
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?

boobs  :grin:
emaw

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 46510
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #30 on: September 26, 2012, 02:36:30 PM »
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?

boobs  :grin:

oh man.  love boobs.  the twins!


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #31 on: September 26, 2012, 02:36:42 PM »
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?

Conjoined.

You may not have noticed, but Chris Harper is actually two players completely conjoined with one head and one body.

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #32 on: September 26, 2012, 02:42:01 PM »
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline EllToPay

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5174
  • Typical EMAW
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #33 on: September 26, 2012, 03:28:31 PM »
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21337
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #34 on: September 26, 2012, 03:29:37 PM »
kellis scribner

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #35 on: September 26, 2012, 03:30:31 PM »
 :sdeek: :curse:

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21337
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #36 on: September 26, 2012, 03:31:26 PM »
My favorite part is how he took cell phone photos of his television screen.

Offline SleepFighter

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1965
  • I'll wait here for my Cherry Coke Zero.
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #37 on: September 26, 2012, 03:32:54 PM »
He should have just straight jacked FAN's screenshots.

Offline steve dave

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 85346
  • Romantic Fist Attachment
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #38 on: September 26, 2012, 03:33:05 PM »
everyone flame the crap out of the comments  :chainsaw:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37111
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #39 on: September 26, 2012, 03:33:50 PM »
My favorite part is how he took cell phone photos of his television screen.

I think he just took those photos of his computer screen while he was reading Fanalysis. He's a squawk, though, and we probably just should stop expecting better.

Offline Frankenklein

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1815
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #40 on: September 26, 2012, 03:59:00 PM »
 ksu_FAN for HCIW  :dance:

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13753
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #41 on: September 26, 2012, 04:26:06 PM »
My favorite part is how he took cell phone photos of his television screen.

Yes...is the orange glow from his face or his wife bringing in a fresh pan of cookies and blowjobs?

Offline nicname

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 15859
  • Deal with it.
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #42 on: September 26, 2012, 05:03:09 PM »
I hope you take this as a compliment _Fan, but when I read these I always imagine I'm listening to Chris Mortensen dissecting the play for those old ESPN shows. 

If there was a gif of nicname thwarting the attempted-flag-taker and then gesturing him to suck it, followed by motioning for all of Hilton Shelter to boo him louder, it'd be better than that auburn gif.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #43 on: September 26, 2012, 05:51:29 PM »
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

Quote
Following in the footsteps of Missouri beat writer Terez Paylor, who came up with the Film Room idea last week, here is a look at how K-State used the empty backfield, and how Oklahoma responded to it, on Saturday.

 :dubious:


Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53340
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #44 on: September 26, 2012, 06:02:57 PM »
Early to mid 90's of Snyder I, empty backfields against teams like OU made me  :ohno: .  We couldn't get guys blocked, and our QB's were sloth like, so that means the D didn't have to have a shadow. 

Now we do it and the defense has to account for numerous facets . . . it also really helps when we get up to the line and Klein is able to read the defense.

Offline yoga-like_abana

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13245
  • Don't @ me boy, cause I ain't said crap
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #45 on: September 26, 2012, 06:03:10 PM »
feels good to be a wild wild cat fan, the cats are so boss

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17146
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #46 on: September 26, 2012, 06:25:54 PM »
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

That's ridiculous. What a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). The only K-State fans who are going to know what he's talking about are all on goEMAW. Did he think we wouldn't notice?

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #47 on: September 26, 2012, 06:27:36 PM »
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?

Offline SabiNation

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2089
  • USA Handball - Rio 2016
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #48 on: September 26, 2012, 07:17:03 PM »
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?

Question with a question, eh??  :shakesfist:  That said, I like your answer!!!    :emawkid:
"If i worked for the NY times, and my boss told me 'hey. if you keep ranking ksu so high, we may fire you' i would tell my boss to 'bring it on.'"  -FFF

Offline ManBearPig

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 733
    • View Profile
Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
« Reply #49 on: September 26, 2012, 07:27:31 PM »
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?

Question with a question, eh??  :shakesfist:  That said, I like your answer!!!    :emawkid:
It's a really hard question to answer at this point. Rooks and Lucas are your prototypical pass blocking tackles, and have protected Collin really well so far. But I would say run blocking for the fact that that Hubert/Klein have had so much success....and everytime we pull Whitehair he just flat out destroys people. 
THE_ED'S STAYING ALIVE GAME CHAMPION