goemaw.com

TITLETOWN - A Decade Long Celebration Of The Greatest Achievement In College Athletics History => Kansas State Football => Topic started by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 11:52:06 AM

Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 11:52:06 AM
http://goEMAW.com/blog/?p=2319
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2012, 11:54:40 AM
I thought this was super fun during the game. OU absolutely crap themselves whenever we showed this.

Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 26, 2012, 11:56:42 AM
_FAN, I think some of your images were meant to have added circles, lines, etc.  In particular: #5 – Corner Route Against an Unconventional Defense
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 11:58:55 AM
_FAN, I think some of your images were meant to have added circles, lines, etc.  In particular: #5 – Corner Route Against an Unconventional Defense

Should be fixed now, I had the incorrect image in there.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: ew2x4 on September 26, 2012, 12:01:48 PM
Great stuff FAN, as always.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 'taterblast on September 26, 2012, 12:05:19 PM
empty formation is nearly impossible to stop if you don't get a pass rush. SOMEONE is going to get open if they run the routes properly. and with our seemingly improved o-line, this is a great thing for us.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 26, 2012, 12:06:01 PM
Excellent  :thumbs:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: mocat on September 26, 2012, 12:14:47 PM
Holy mother of our lord, our center absolutely destroyed the LB on Klein run #2.  :sdeek:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: The Manhatter on September 26, 2012, 12:19:10 PM
I loved the designs on these passing plays while watching the game.  But i couldn't help but link it to line play.  Due to the differences in line play (when we had the ball) from a year ago we could block with 5 and flood the secondary with 5 receivers.  That created the one-on-one matchups we wanted.  In this case, it was Thompson or Lockett with a LB or safety.  Compare that two a year ago when we needed 7 or 8 to stay in and block 4-6 and "flood" OU's secondary with one or two receivers.  That is how having to max protect places limitations on your offense.  Offensive lineman like Hanson, Freeze, and Aufner couldn't handle Alexander, Ronnell Lewis, etc. a year ago.  They still would get to Klein with 4 being blocked by 7.  Not the case this year.

I laugh at the folks who say, "they didn't even attempt to pass rush"....yes, they didn't in some cases because they couldn't.  Last year they brought it because we didn't have the same capability we do this year.  This year they couldn't get there most of the time even if they tried so they were far more concerned about Klein burning them with his feet.

ah, the beauty of line play.  it opens up the possibilities on the back end and changes the entire complexion of a game from one season to the next.  thank you and good night!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: ChiComCat on September 26, 2012, 12:22:57 PM
Defenses having to have a personnel group completely different than 80% of our snaps for a no back set has got to be a pain in the ass for them.  Not to mention us not being afraid to run out of it when they do put in 6 DBs.  Not to mention, I'm sure defenses wish we would go for the big play more often rather than the 4 or 5 yard runs consistently and kill the clock
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: pissclams on September 26, 2012, 12:47:17 PM
i only understand about 20% of these things but i love reading them
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: TheCatFanSpeaks on September 26, 2012, 12:56:48 PM
i only understand about 20% of these things but i love reading them

Yep.  Same here.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Emo EMAW on September 26, 2012, 12:57:38 PM
I remember watching the game live when Klein motioned Sexton in to block on play #5.  I was thinking no way in hell is Curry going to be able to block that guy twice his size, but he stuck his cleats in and did a good job. 
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: SabiNation on September 26, 2012, 12:57:39 PM
Our offense is really good!   :sdeek:

Thanks _Fan, 'Hatter for all of the analysis.  Love reading your stuff
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MixBerryCrunch on September 26, 2012, 01:07:10 PM
i only understand about 20% of these things but i love reading them
Excellent stuff.   :love: our offensive line.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: DOOM_Catz on September 26, 2012, 01:08:33 PM
Just as we'd take Thompson on a safety one-on-one any day with those empty sets, the beauty of these empty sets is that it dramatically increases the odds of if/when Klein runs he is only facing a linebacker. Guaranteed 4 yds and I'm being modest.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: steve dave on September 26, 2012, 01:13:12 PM
goEMAW.com, the ONLY Kansas State website with high level football analysis and breakdown. Great job _FAN.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: yoEMAW on September 26, 2012, 01:13:55 PM
It's nice having another WR with size out there in Torell Miller on these sets. I hope he shakes off the dropsies and comes out big against KU.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on September 26, 2012, 01:16:15 PM
FAN isn't this what Arkansas did to use in the cotton bowl, picking on the linebacker in coverage and other junk? Did Bill swagger jack some schemes? 
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 01:30:26 PM
FAN isn't this what Arkansas did to use in the cotton bowl, picking on the linebacker in coverage and other junk? Did Bill swagger jack some schemes? 

The crossing route scheme, especially from #4, is similar to what Arkansas did a lot.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 26, 2012, 02:04:59 PM
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 'taterblast on September 26, 2012, 02:06:43 PM
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

no we showed it before. i recall a few 4x1 sets vs. miami.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: catzacker on September 26, 2012, 02:11:07 PM
_Fan, have a question.  As it relates to our defense, can you explain why we couldn’t/didn’t/had a hard time adjusting to OU’s set where they lined up in shotgun set with the RB off set to the right, w/ twins to each side..motioned the RB to the side (moving AB with him)…the inside receiver(s) run a seam route or deep out, the outside receiver(s) runs a delay underneath but always stops outside of the hash.  We kinda got destroyed on this nearly every time they ran it.  I wasn’t sure why we couldn’t make the adjustment or what those routes were doing to our secondary that made it so difficult to adjust. 
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 02:13:04 PM
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

We went empty 5 times vs Miami.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 8manpick on September 26, 2012, 02:14:20 PM
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

We went empty 5 times vs Miami.

Were they all 4 x 1?  I remember thinking at the time that I don't remember seeing that last year.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 02:14:34 PM
_Fan, have a question.  As it relates to our defense, can you explain why we couldn’t/didn’t/had a hard time adjusting to OU’s set where they lined up in shotgun set with the RB off set to the right, w/ twins to each side..motioned the RB to the side (moving AB with him)…the inside receiver(s) run a seam route or deep out, the outside receiver(s) runs a delay underneath but always stops outside of the hash.  We kinda got destroyed on this nearly every time they ran it.  I wasn’t sure why we couldn’t make the adjustment or what those routes were doing to our secondary that made it so difficult to adjust. 

Can you post a link to an example from youtube? I'd like to look at it. Honestly, I'm more in tune with offense because I know more on that side of the ball, but I would be interested in looking at what you are talking about.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 02:15:15 PM
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

We went empty 5 times vs Miami.

Were they all 4 x 1?  I remember thinking at the time that I don't remember seeing that last year.

I think they were 3 x 2, but I'd have to go back and look.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: pissclams on September 26, 2012, 02:18:38 PM
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 8manpick on September 26, 2012, 02:21:57 PM
Just to make sure I understand, we never showed an empty backfield until OU, correct?

We went empty 5 times vs Miami.

Were they all 4 x 1?  I remember thinking at the time that I don't remember seeing that last year.

I think they were 3 x 2, but I'd have to go back and look.

No need to... I know at least 1 when we were heading to the north endzone (first quarter?) was 4 x 1.  Not worth going back to check on the others.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: GoodForAnother on September 26, 2012, 02:34:35 PM
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?

boobs  :grin:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: pissclams on September 26, 2012, 02:36:30 PM
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?

boobs  :grin:

oh man.  love boobs.  the twins!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 02:36:42 PM
_FAN, question- when you use the term "twins", are you referring to actual identical, fraternal, or Siamese twins?

Conjoined.

You may not have noticed, but Chris Harper is actually two players completely conjoined with one head and one body.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: SabiNation on September 26, 2012, 02:42:01 PM
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: EllToPay on September 26, 2012, 03:28:31 PM
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2012, 03:29:37 PM
kellis scribner
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: steve dave on September 26, 2012, 03:30:31 PM
 :sdeek: :curse:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: puniraptor on September 26, 2012, 03:31:26 PM
My favorite part is how he took cell phone photos of his television screen.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: SleepFighter on September 26, 2012, 03:32:54 PM
He should have just straight jacked FAN's screenshots.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: steve dave on September 26, 2012, 03:33:05 PM
everyone flame the crap out of the comments  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 26, 2012, 03:33:50 PM
My favorite part is how he took cell phone photos of his television screen.

I think he just took those photos of his computer screen while he was reading Fanalysis. He's a squawk, though, and we probably just should stop expecting better.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Frankenklein on September 26, 2012, 03:59:00 PM
 ksu_FAN for HCIW  :dance:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 26, 2012, 04:26:06 PM
My favorite part is how he took cell phone photos of his television screen.

Yes...is the orange glow from his face or his wife bringing in a fresh pan of cookies and blowjobs?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: nicname on September 26, 2012, 05:03:09 PM
I hope you take this as a compliment _Fan, but when I read these I always imagine I'm listening to Chris Mortensen dissecting the play for those old ESPN shows. 

Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 05:51:29 PM
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

Quote
Following in the footsteps of Missouri beat writer Terez Paylor, who came up with the Film Room idea last week, here is a look at how K-State used the empty backfield, and how Oklahoma responded to it, on Saturday.

 :dubious:

Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 26, 2012, 06:02:57 PM
Early to mid 90's of Snyder I, empty backfields against teams like OU made me  :ohno: .  We couldn't get guys blocked, and our QB's were sloth like, so that means the D didn't have to have a shadow. 

Now we do it and the defense has to account for numerous facets . . . it also really helps when we get up to the line and Klein is able to read the defense.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: yoga-like_abana on September 26, 2012, 06:03:10 PM
feels good to be a wild wild cat fan, the cats are so boss
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 26, 2012, 06:25:54 PM
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

That's ridiculous. What a Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!). The only K-State fans who are going to know what he's talking about are all on goEMAW. Did he think we wouldn't notice?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on September 26, 2012, 06:27:36 PM
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: SabiNation on September 26, 2012, 07:17:03 PM
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?

Question with a question, eh??  :shakesfist:  That said, I like your answer!!!    :emawkid:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: ManBearPig on September 26, 2012, 07:27:31 PM
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?

Question with a question, eh??  :shakesfist:  That said, I like your answer!!!    :emawkid:
It's a really hard question to answer at this point. Rooks and Lucas are your prototypical pass blocking tackles, and have protected Collin really well so far. But I would say run blocking for the fact that that Hubert/Klein have had so much success....and everytime we pull Whitehair he just flat out destroys people. 
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 26, 2012, 07:37:39 PM
Anyone can field this question as they wish, but I'd love to get either _Fan or Hatter's opinion  (or both!?!) :

If you had to choose the "strength" of our O-Line, would you say that they (as a collective unit) are better at run blocking, or pass protection?

Can you have a strength if you have no weakness?

Question with a question, eh??  :shakesfist:  That said, I like your answer!!!    :emawkid:
It's a really hard question to answer at this point. Rooks and Lucas are your prototypical pass blocking tackles, and have protected Collin really well so far. But I would say run blocking for the fact that that Hubert/Klein have had so much success....and everytime we pull Whitehair he just flat out destroys people.

Agreed. Based on the season so far, especially the OU game, the line has shown they are solid at both. Now we have to see if it holds for the season. The ability to protect in the empty sets was particularly impressive in pass blocking, OU really didn't come close to pressuring Klein.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 26, 2012, 08:01:07 PM
KELLIS ROBINETT, TEREZ PAYLOR, BOB LUTZ, KIM NUSSBAUM, YOU WILL ALL BE SUED HAHAHAHA
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: catzacker on September 26, 2012, 08:02:55 PM
Agreed. Based on the season so far, especially the OU game, the line has shown they are solid at both. Now we have to see if it holds for the season. The ability to protect in the empty sets was particularly impressive in pass blocking, OU really didn't come close to pressuring Klein.

Was it me or did Mike try the "KU vs. Brad Smith" approach to Klein?  Like, he seemed perfectly content with applying zero pressure all night, it was almost like he instructed his tackles to remain at the line of scrimmage (either that or our Guards/Center are f'ing spectacular).  I dunno.  I guess the empty or spread formations kept them from bringing backers like last year.  I thought Mike was even more aggressive than Beautiful Venzy.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: catzacker on September 26, 2012, 08:05:22 PM
_Fan, have a question.  As it relates to our defense, can you explain why we couldn’t/didn’t/had a hard time adjusting to OU’s set where they lined up in shotgun set with the RB off set to the right, w/ twins to each side..motioned the RB to the side (moving AB with him)…the inside receiver(s) run a seam route or deep out, the outside receiver(s) runs a delay underneath but always stops outside of the hash.  We kinda got destroyed on this nearly every time they ran it.  I wasn’t sure why we couldn’t make the adjustment or what those routes were doing to our secondary that made it so difficult to adjust. 

Can you post a link to an example from youtube? I'd like to look at it. Honestly, I'm more in tune with offense because I know more on that side of the ball, but I would be interested in looking at what you are talking about.

They actually didn't run it as much as I thought nor was it really for that much of yardage.  I thought it was about 5 times, it was only 4 (however even one of those 4 they ran a  WR screen off that same action).

28:35
50:35
54:25
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KcYjXDGJ0k&list=UUlkX4yKk94X1pkpp0-o3iBw&index=1&feature=plcp (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6KcYjXDGJ0k&list=UUlkX4yKk94X1pkpp0-o3iBw&index=1&feature=plcp)
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: p1k3 on September 26, 2012, 08:14:16 PM
Man Kellis, that's awful.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 26, 2012, 08:28:09 PM
Man Kellis, that's awful.

So, all our bros (Beak, Manbeck, Rob) are gone from the media table leaving a bunch of losers and rookie Hambone.  No holds barred this hoops season.  I just hope I can yell as loud as normal while wearing my grocery bag.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 26, 2012, 08:46:42 PM
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

Quote
Following in the footsteps of Missouri beat writer Terez Paylor, who came up with the Film Room idea last week, here is a look at how K-State used the empty backfield, and how Oklahoma responded to it, on Saturday.

 :dubious:

oh man.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: RightMeow on September 26, 2012, 10:01:16 PM
What if Fan is Kellis?  And Kellis is Fan?  Finkel?  Einhorn?  I'm so confused.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 26, 2012, 10:52:45 PM
What if Fan is Kellis?  And Kellis is Fan?  Finkel?  Einhorn?  I'm so confused.
your gun is digging into my hip!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: LilSmokyMcIntyre on September 27, 2012, 06:42:19 AM
jfc, kellis. at least hide the fact that you are straight copying from goEMAW.

http://blogs.kansas.com/kstated/2012/09/26/film-room-the-empty-backfield/

I figured Fitz would jack it. Never even occurred to me that Kellis would. And you wonder why all the talent keeps leaving the Star. Smh
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Rams on September 27, 2012, 08:39:26 AM
so is goEMAW brass actually doing something about this or just throwing poop at him on twitter?  I mean, I'm not sure whether plagiarism can actually be proven here (even though it's pretty obvious to us), but if this site has an actual real life chance to get a shitty sqwuawk beat writer in hot water and all you do is try and embarrass him via social media... :facepalm:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 08:42:28 AM
so is goEMAW brass actually doing something about this or just throwing poop at him on twitter?  I mean, I'm not sure whether plagiarism can actually be proven here (even though it's pretty obvious to us), but if this site has an actual real life chance to get a shitty sqwuawk beat writer in hot water and all you do is try and embarrass him via social media... :facepalm:

They hired him despite worse.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: sonofdaxjones on September 27, 2012, 08:54:15 AM
Oh my word Kellis.

Title: Re: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Rams on September 27, 2012, 08:55:41 AM
so is goEMAW brass actually doing something about this or just throwing poop at him on twitter?  I mean, I'm not sure whether plagiarism can actually be proven here (even though it's pretty obvious to us), but if this site has an actual real life chance to get a shitty sqwuawk beat writer in hot water and all you do is try and embarrass him via social media... :facepalm:

They hired him despite worse.

just to clarify...

as an employee of a major regional news outlet, being a shitty beat writer and hating the team you cover is a worse offense than blatant plagiarism.

got it
Title: Re: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 27, 2012, 08:59:51 AM
so is goEMAW brass actually doing something about this or just throwing poop at him on twitter?  I mean, I'm not sure whether plagiarism can actually be proven here (even though it's pretty obvious to us), but if this site has an actual real life chance to get a shitty sqwuawk beat writer in hot water and all you do is try and embarrass him via social media... :facepalm:

They hired him despite worse.

just to clarify...

as an employee of a major regional news outlet, being a shitty beat writer and hating the team you cover is a worse offense than blatant plagiarism.

got it

To be fair, he didn't even use Youtube...
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: ChiComCat on September 27, 2012, 09:11:40 AM
Can we use some of that IP magic that the mods do to see how often Kellis was on the blog?  Could probably start by using a JMart IP maybe :dunno:

Then: cease and desist
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 09:15:22 AM
so is goEMAW brass actually doing something about this or just throwing poop at him on twitter?  I mean, I'm not sure whether plagiarism can actually be proven here (even though it's pretty obvious to us), but if this site has an actual real life chance to get a shitty sqwuawk beat writer in hot water and all you do is try and embarrass him via social media... :facepalm:

They hired him despite worse.

just to clarify...

as an employee of a major regional news outlet, being a shitty beat writer and hating the team you cover is a worse offense than blatant plagiarism.

got it

No.  They hired (past tense) him despite worse.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: p1k3 on September 27, 2012, 10:14:44 AM
Kellis in damage control mode now
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 27, 2012, 10:18:58 AM
Kellis in damage control mode now

Quote
Just noticed this high-tech breakdown of K-State's empty backfield. Good stuff. Check it out: goEMAW.com/blog/?p=2319

Quote
@TrimGoEMAW Settle down. I didn't rip anyone off. Saw that post for the first time this morning. Sometimes people have similar ideas.

SETTLE DOWN TRIM!!! SETTLE DOWN!!!!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 27, 2012, 10:23:54 AM
wow. did he just delete all of the comments and make it impossible to make a new comment. what an absolute clownshow of a joke. i mean i had about 8% respect for the guy before this and 0% now. he should be absolutely embarrased and ashamed.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 8manpick on September 27, 2012, 10:30:39 AM
wow. did he just delete all of the comments and make it impossible to make a new comment.
no?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 27, 2012, 10:40:33 AM
wow. did he just delete all of the comments and make it impossible to make a new comment.
no?

weird. they don't show up from my work computer. level of respect back up to 8%. 10% if there is a written apology.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Mr Bread on September 27, 2012, 10:47:21 AM
The saddest part is that his were significantly shittier than _FAN's.  At least slightly improve upon it if you're going to plagiarize.  For the sake of Jesus Christos, it's his rough ridin' job.  :facepalm: 
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 8manpick on September 27, 2012, 10:51:19 AM
The saddest part is that his were significantly shittier than _FAN's.  At least slightly improve upon it if you're going to plagiarize.  For the sake of Jesus Christos, it's his rough ridin' job.  :facepalm: 

Even if he had any HFIQ to put in, I highly doubt his subscribers would be able to appreciate it.  Going with "the middle opened up and he completed the pass for a first down" is about as HFIQ as it can get for them.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: steve dave on September 27, 2012, 10:55:37 AM
LET'S GET HIM!  :curse:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 0.42 on September 27, 2012, 10:55:53 AM
LET'S GET HIM!  :curse:

on it :dance:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Mr Bread on September 27, 2012, 11:00:49 AM
The saddest part is that his were significantly shittier than _FAN's.  At least slightly improve upon it if you're going to plagiarize.  For the sake of Jesus Christos, it's his rough ridin' job.  :facepalm: 

Even if he had any HFIQ to put in, I highly doubt his subscribers would be able to appreciate it.  Going with "the middle opened up and he completed the pass for a first down" is about as HFIQ as it can get for them.

Yeah, but even his pictures were worse (i.e., lower quality, didn't have any fancy markings, etc.).  Even dummies like nice pictures.  Do that up at least. 
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 11:03:13 AM
Oh man, how close was I to not renewing my hoops tickets?  :lol:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 27, 2012, 11:04:36 AM
The saddest part is that his were significantly shittier than _FAN's.  At least slightly improve upon it if you're going to plagiarize.  For the sake of Jesus Christos, it's his rough ridin' job.  :facepalm: 

Even if he had any HFIQ to put in, I highly doubt his subscribers would be able to appreciate it.  Going with "the middle opened up and he completed the pass for a first down" is about as HFIQ as it can get for them.

Yeah, but even his pictures were worse (i.e., lower quality, didn't have any fancy markings, etc.).  Even dummies like nice pictures.  Do that up at least.

in other words "he kellis'd it".
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Sandstone Outcropping on September 27, 2012, 11:06:39 AM
Hey, where is that "Passing the Day with powerespect People" vid from back in the ksufans.com era.

I enjoyed that. It was a nice celebration of Kellis and his love for the KSU 'Cats.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: WillieWatanabe on September 27, 2012, 11:08:33 AM
If _FAN's pissed, i'm pissed.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 11:10:31 AM
Sorry, guys.  Thanks to sacks of crap like Kellis Robinett and Vaughn Scribner, we're gonna have to make the blog a premium subscription service.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kslim on September 27, 2012, 11:14:20 AM
i generally dont take the internet too serious (i mean hell my pic has been posted multiple times) but this pisses me the eff off, eff that bad person karma is a mother rough rider
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: yoEMAW on September 27, 2012, 11:15:36 AM
Sorry, guys.  Thanks to sacks of crap like Kellis Robinett and Vaughn Scribner, we're gonna have to make the blog a premium subscription service.

Oh man, this pisses me right off.  :chainsaw:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kslim on September 27, 2012, 11:17:06 AM
Sorry, guys.  Thanks to sacks of crap like Kellis Robinett and Vaughn Scribner, we're gonna have to make the blog a premium subscription service.

make it so all paid subscriptions go straight to the fatty fund
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: PorkChop Express on September 27, 2012, 11:19:58 AM
I don't see what's wrong here.  There aren't any arrows.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 27, 2012, 11:21:50 AM
Sorry, guys.  Thanks to sacks of crap like Kellis Robinett and Vaughn Scribner, we're gonna have to make the blog a premium subscription service.

Fine by me!  _Fan deserves a few bucks for his hard work!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Winters on September 27, 2012, 11:22:30 AM
Where is BSAC for this?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 0.42 on September 27, 2012, 11:28:49 AM
KC Star people to contact:

Mi-Ai Parrish, President and Publisher
816-234-4878

Mike Fannin, Editor and Vice President
816-234-4345


Wichita Eagle:

Senior editor, Sherry Chisenhall

316-268-6405
[email protected]

Sports editor, Kirk Seminoff

316-268-6278
[email protected]
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 11:34:49 AM
KC Star people to contact:

Mi-Ai Parrish, President and Publisher
816-234-4878

Mike Fannin, Editor and Vice President
816-234-4345


Wichita Eagle:

Senior editor, Sherry Chisenhall

316-268-6405
[email protected]

Sports editor, Kirk Seminoff

316-268-6278
[email protected]


Kellis Robinett, live and in person, at various places in Manhattan and at the (f)OOD beginning October 30.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 27, 2012, 11:35:41 AM
KC Star people to contact:

Mi-Ai Parrish, President and Publisher
816-234-4878

Mike Fannin, Editor and Vice President
816-234-4345


Wichita Eagle:

Senior editor, Sherry Chisenhall

316-268-6405
[email protected]

Sports editor, Kirk Seminoff

316-268-6278
[email protected]


Kellis Robinett, live and in person, at various places in Manhattan and at the (f)OOD beginning October 30.

SETTLE DOWN
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 0.42 on September 27, 2012, 11:39:01 AM
KC Star people to contact:

Mi-Ai Parrish, President and Publisher
816-234-4878

Mike Fannin, Editor and Vice President
816-234-4345


Wichita Eagle:

Senior editor, Sherry Chisenhall

316-268-6405
[email protected]

Sports editor, Kirk Seminoff

316-268-6278
[email protected]


Kellis Robinett, live and in person, at various places in Manhattan and at the (f)OOD beginning October 30.

I'm in favor of an "all of the above" approach
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 27, 2012, 11:39:20 AM
Same concept?  CHECK
Same photos (except hastily photo'd off of a t.v.)?   CHECK
Similar discussion (except sloppily explain)?  CHECK
over 4 hours after _Fan posted his?   :shy:

Xerox Robinette is born
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 27, 2012, 11:40:27 AM
Read both of those write ups then ask yourself which one was written by a paid sports journalist?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Rage Against the McKee on September 27, 2012, 11:44:19 AM
Same concept?  CHECK
Same photos (except hastily photo'd off of a t.v.)?   CHECK
Similar discussion (except sloppily explain)?  CHECK
over 4 hours after _Fan posted his?   :shy:

Xerox Robinette is born

Xerox is too good for him. More like Kodak Robinette.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: yoEMAW on September 27, 2012, 11:45:47 AM
Read both of those write ups then ask yourself which one was written by a paid sports journalist?

TBH, I'd go with Kellis here. We'd be doing _FAN a disservice to lump him in with those rubes.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: slobber on September 27, 2012, 11:47:47 AM
Can somebody start a separate thread talking about dumb asses who plagiarize _FAN? Please stop tarnishing this thread and _FAN's work with such stupid crap.

Thank you.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dugout DickStone on September 27, 2012, 11:48:36 AM
Read both of those write ups then ask yourself which one was written by a paid sports journalist?

TBH, I'd go with Kellis here. We'd be doing _FAN a disservice to lump him in with those rubes.

Really?  I think one makes much more sense, doesn't write to the lowest common denominator and doesn't waste words.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kslim on September 27, 2012, 11:50:29 AM
Read both of those write ups then ask yourself which one was written by a paid sports journalist?

TBH, I'd go with Kellis here. We'd be doing _FAN a disservice to lump him in with those rubes.

what?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: yoEMAW on September 27, 2012, 11:53:58 AM
Read both of those write ups then ask yourself which one was written by a paid sports journalist?

TBH, I'd go with Kellis here. We'd be doing _FAN a disservice to lump him in with those rubes.

Really?  I think one makes much more sense, doesn't write to the lowest common denominator and doesn't waste words.

Just saying, I've never read a more in-depth breakdown by a paid journalist period. _FAN's posts strike me as insider, Pentagon war room stuff that is normally classified uber top secret.
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: felix rex on September 27, 2012, 11:57:59 AM
These are my favorite moments on twitter.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kslim on September 27, 2012, 11:59:07 AM
These are my favorite moments on twitter.

they are a lot more fun when the coward actually tweets back
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: wes mantooth on September 27, 2012, 12:21:05 PM
Sometimes people have similar ideas!
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: felix rex on September 27, 2012, 12:25:11 PM
These are my favorite moments on twitter.

they are a lot more fun when the coward actually tweets back

It's early.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 27, 2012, 12:27:07 PM
(https://goemaw.com/forum/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg43.imageshack.us%2Fimg43%2F3092%2Fkellisblog2.gif&hash=c81f5083d62f5957f243c1392bd15ed8c2ffb95d)
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 27, 2012, 12:34:01 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: puniraptor on September 27, 2012, 12:37:57 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.

SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 27, 2012, 12:39:38 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.

SPOILER ALERT!!!!!!

 :sdeek:  No idea Liam Neeson was in The Grey...unring the bell!  Unring the bell!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 27, 2012, 12:43:08 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.


except that he's not liam neeson. he's that guy that nobody liked that just gave up at the end and sat there for the wolves to come get him.
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: felix rex on September 27, 2012, 12:46:42 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.

Hey, me too!
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 27, 2012, 12:47:43 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.


except that he's not liam neeson. he's that guy that nobody like that just gave up at the end and sat there for the wolves to come get him.

True.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Dr Rick Daris on September 27, 2012, 12:49:46 PM
So I watched The Grey last night (relax, it was on Netflix). This is starting to feel like goEMAW is the wolves and Kellis is Liam Neeson.


except that he's not liam neeson. he's that guy that nobody like that just gave up at the end and sat there for the wolves to come get him.

True.

see, kellis! please just give up now. nobody here likes you! 
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: ksu_FANw on September 27, 2012, 01:57:13 PM
What if Fan is Kellis?  And Kellis is Fan?  Finkel?  Einhorn?  I'm so confused.

No way.
_FAN can't be confused...he's got integrity, creativity, fresh ideas, genius offensive FB skills and a great wife.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 02:01:34 PM
What if Fan is Kellis?  And Kellis is Fan?  Finkel?  Einhorn?  I'm so confused.

No way.
_FAN can't be confused...he's got integrity, creativity, fresh ideas, genius offensive FB skills and a great wife.

COOKIE BAKE-OFF
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: puniraptor on September 27, 2012, 02:04:58 PM
What if Fan is Kellis?  And Kellis is Fan?  Finkel?  Einhorn?  I'm so confused.

No way.
_FAN can't be confused...he's got integrity, creativity, fresh ideas, genius offensive FB skills and a great wife.

COOKIE BAKE-OFF

 :runaway: :excited:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: kso_FAN on September 27, 2012, 02:17:31 PM
What if Fan is Kellis?  And Kellis is Fan?  Finkel?  Einhorn?  I'm so confused.

No way.
_FAN can't be confused...he's got integrity, creativity, fresh ideas, genius offensive FB skills and a great wife.

GWOAT
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Cartierfor3 on September 27, 2012, 02:21:16 PM
This thread just got adorable
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 02:23:14 PM
This thread just got adorable

EMAW always wins.
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: felix rex on September 27, 2012, 02:26:36 PM
This thread just got adorable

Yes. Oh My.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Pittcat on September 27, 2012, 02:28:44 PM
This thread just got adorable

EMAW always wins.

In the end.
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: felix rex on September 27, 2012, 02:36:07 PM
Pero cae la hora de la venganza, y te amo.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: slobber on September 27, 2012, 02:47:34 PM
Pero cae la hora de la venganza, y te amo.
Does that mean something like "I will be there for you in the hour of vengeance, my friend."?
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: p1k3 on September 27, 2012, 02:52:27 PM
Pero cae la hora de la venganza, y te amo.
Does that mean something like "I will be there for you in the hour of vengeance, my friend."?

Now is the time for4 vengance, and I love you

i think
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: p1k3 on September 27, 2012, 02:55:27 PM
Pero cae la hora de la venganza, y te amo.
Does that mean something like "I will be there for you in the hour of vengeance, my friend."?

Now is the time for4 vengance, and I love you

i think

replacement keyboard!

 :dubious:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Boom Roasted on September 27, 2012, 03:08:23 PM
Wonder if Kellis will jack this one too???

http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder

Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Mixed-Nutz on September 27, 2012, 03:25:32 PM
Quote
There are two things going on here that we'll need to examine. First of all is the Urban Meyer-inspired spread attack that KSU used in these situations:

 :chainsaw:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 27, 2012, 03:48:36 PM
 :lol:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: PorkChop Express on September 27, 2012, 03:53:49 PM
Wonder if Kellis will jack this one too???

http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder

my god that's good.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 'taterblast on September 27, 2012, 03:58:03 PM
Quote
Snyder's 'cats are like a conservative poker player. You can bluff all day and try and steal blinds but he's going to fold rubbish and he's going to wait you out until he can punish your attempt to steal his blind with pocket rockets. He doesn't make mistakes and he only very selectively bluffs.

Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: puniraptor on September 27, 2012, 04:06:24 PM
Quote
Snyder's 'cats are like a conservative poker player. You can bluff all day and try and steal blinds but he's going to fold rubbish and he's going to wait you out until he can punish your attempt to steal his blind with pocket rockets. He doesn't make mistakes and he only very selectively bluffs.

what a dreamy rough ridin' paragraph.

 :bill:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Stevesie60 on September 27, 2012, 08:40:28 PM
Quote
Snyder's 'cats are like a conservative poker player. You can bluff all day and try and steal blinds but he's going to fold rubbish and he's going to wait you out until he can punish your attempt to steal his blind with pocket rockets. He doesn't make mistakes and he only very selectively bluffs.



The perfect analogy.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: yoga-like_abana on September 27, 2012, 09:27:36 PM
Quote
There are two things going on here that we'll need to examine. First of all is the Urban Meyer-inspired spread attack that KSU used in these situations:

 :chainsaw:
:angry: Trim I demand one bball ticket so I can rip kellis' rough ridin' throat out
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: SabiNation on September 27, 2012, 09:56:38 PM
Quote
Snyder's 'cats are like a conservative poker player. You can bluff all day and try and steal blinds but he's going to fold rubbish and he's going to wait you out until he can punish your attempt to steal his blind with pocket rockets. He doesn't make mistakes and he only very selectively bluffs.

:billdance:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: Trim on September 27, 2012, 10:08:37 PM
Quote
There are two things going on here that we'll need to examine. First of all is the Urban Meyer-inspired spread attack that KSU used in these situations:

 :chainsaw:
:angry: Trim I demand one bball ticket so I can rip kellis' rough ridin' throat out

:thumbs:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: BRULL on September 28, 2012, 12:10:12 AM
http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder (http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder)

 :shakesfist:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: 'taterblast on September 28, 2012, 08:55:43 AM
http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder (http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder)

 :shakesfist:

thanks, BRULLUKE
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: The1BigWillie on September 28, 2012, 08:58:20 AM
Sometimes people have similar ideas!!

 :blah:
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on September 28, 2012, 08:59:33 AM
http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder (http://www.barkingcarnival.com/2012/9/27/3412902/kansas-state-wildcats-oklahoma-sooners-game-review-week-3-recaps-stoops-snyder)

 :shakesfist:

Did you see the part where Snyder Kellis'd Urban Meyer's Spread Option Attack, BRULLUKE? 

Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: steve dave on September 28, 2012, 05:31:17 PM
Quote
DC_Wildcat

Almost on scholarship
Post #282
Washington, D.C.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Re: Kellis plagiarizes. Again.   Reply
It's butthurt fans like you guys that buy Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) tshirts and make our fanbase look like crazy teabaggers.
Posted from Rivals Mobile

some guy in response to the actually very good thread on GPC re. this
Title: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: felix rex on September 29, 2012, 01:43:01 AM
Quote
DC_Wildcat

Almost on scholarship
Post #282
Washington, D.C.
MyFanPage
Add Buddy
Ignore   
Re: Kellis plagiarizes. Again.   Reply
It's butthurt fans like you guys that buy Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) tshirts and make our fanbase look like crazy teabaggers.
Posted from Rivals Mobile

some guy in response to the actually very good thread on GPC re. this

Wow. There is a lot going on there.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: stunted on October 04, 2012, 03:59:39 PM
“This is not a trickery and deceit team,” Weis said of K-State. “They are going to smash it down your throat, and you better be ready to tackle both the quarterback and the running back, because they are going to have the ball in their hands a whole bunch of times.”
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: MadCat on October 04, 2012, 04:46:47 PM
“This is not a trickery and deceit team,” Weis said of K-State.
I will laugh if Shanahan Zulu told him this.
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: ChiComCat on October 05, 2012, 05:44:31 PM
“This is not a trickery and deceit team,” Weis said of K-State. “They are going to smash it down your throat, and you better be ready to tackle both the quarterback and the running back, because they are going to have the ball in their hands a whole bunch of times.”

I feel like Mike Stoops appreciated the nuances of our offense and Weis's plan is "Tackle them"
Title: Re: _FANalysis #3 from OU: Empty Backfield Scheme
Post by: FranklyFrankYou on October 05, 2012, 07:34:03 PM
Mike Stoops-"their offense is hard to stop...multiple offenses...extra blockers"

Cholly-"they run it all the time...our guys are pussies...probably going to give up like a 1000 yards"