0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Belvis Noland on October 27, 2014, 05:00:19 PMQuote from: millertime on October 27, 2014, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: 'taterblast on October 27, 2014, 03:44:08 PM"manhattan, ks has about five people in it'-paul finebaum's side kick guyDoes he know that Starkville and Oxford combined are smaller than Manhattan?They're not. MHK's poplation of 55K includes both students and ft. riley soliders. Looks like Oxford and Starkville don't include student body. That's not true at all, not even a little bit. Let's completely ignore the rules of the census and that ft. riley's population actually counts for Ft. Riley, KS; there are 23,000 students and the fort has a population of 25,000. So for this to be true there would be only 7,000 people in Manhattan that aren't soldiers or students.
Quote from: millertime on October 27, 2014, 04:39:43 PMQuote from: 'taterblast on October 27, 2014, 03:44:08 PM"manhattan, ks has about five people in it'-paul finebaum's side kick guyDoes he know that Starkville and Oxford combined are smaller than Manhattan?They're not. MHK's poplation of 55K includes both students and ft. riley soliders. Looks like Oxford and Starkville don't include student body.
Quote from: 'taterblast on October 27, 2014, 03:44:08 PM"manhattan, ks has about five people in it'-paul finebaum's side kick guyDoes he know that Starkville and Oxford combined are smaller than Manhattan?
"manhattan, ks has about five people in it'-paul finebaum's side kick guy
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:44:53 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:42:06 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:36:49 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:03:54 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?No. I would want to know who the teams beat. Team B would be Big 12 champs and would likely have the better wins.I agree SOS is important but if SOS is pretty much equal between two teams with one loss you need to look at the lossIf the schedules were equal, team B would have a win over an 11-1 team and clearly be the best team in its conference. Team A would just be 2nd best. I really don't care that team A was better than Kansas, and the committee shouldn't, either.I think you're assuming A and B are in the same conference and played each other but they couldn't be,one would have two losses.I just think if you have two one loss teams and they both have played really close SOS"s you have to look at the loss and if one of them lost to a really crap school the other should get the nod
Quote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:42:06 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:36:49 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:03:54 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?No. I would want to know who the teams beat. Team B would be Big 12 champs and would likely have the better wins.I agree SOS is important but if SOS is pretty much equal between two teams with one loss you need to look at the lossIf the schedules were equal, team B would have a win over an 11-1 team and clearly be the best team in its conference. Team A would just be 2nd best. I really don't care that team A was better than Kansas, and the committee shouldn't, either.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:36:49 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:03:54 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?No. I would want to know who the teams beat. Team B would be Big 12 champs and would likely have the better wins.I agree SOS is important but if SOS is pretty much equal between two teams with one loss you need to look at the loss
Quote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:03:54 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?No. I would want to know who the teams beat. Team B would be Big 12 champs and would likely have the better wins.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?
Quote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.
I think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-Tech
Iowa State might be as bad as kansas.
Quote from: Cire on October 27, 2014, 06:08:52 PMIowa State might be as bad as kansas. Not even close. They put up 45 on Texas in Austin. KU has scored 82 points all year.
Quote from: Bookcat on October 28, 2014, 10:05:14 AMQuote from: Cire on October 27, 2014, 06:08:52 PMIowa State might be as bad as kansas. Not even close. They put up 45 on Texas in Austin. KU has scored 82 points all year.
Quote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 07:25:43 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:44:53 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:42:06 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:36:49 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:03:54 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?No. I would want to know who the teams beat. Team B would be Big 12 champs and would likely have the better wins.I agree SOS is important but if SOS is pretty much equal between two teams with one loss you need to look at the lossIf the schedules were equal, team B would have a win over an 11-1 team and clearly be the best team in its conference. Team A would just be 2nd best. I really don't care that team A was better than Kansas, and the committee shouldn't, either.I think you're assuming A and B are in the same conference and played each other but they couldn't be,one would have two losses.I just think if you have two one loss teams and they both have played really close SOS"s you have to look at the loss and if one of them lost to a really crap school the other should get the nod If the schedules are truly equal, then the team with the worst loss should get the nod, because that means they have more good wins. Nobody should give a crap about a game against a team like Kansas.
Quote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 28, 2014, 08:12:53 AMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 07:25:43 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:44:53 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:42:06 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 05:36:49 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 05:03:54 PMQuote from: Rage Against the McKee on October 27, 2014, 04:51:30 PMQuote from: Frankenklein on October 27, 2014, 04:46:12 PMI think our loss to Auburn looks better than Georgia losing to South Carolina and Ohio State losing to V-TechIt shouldn't. Our win over Oklahoma looks a whole lot better than anything Georgia or Ohio State have done, though.So if you have two 11-1 teams,team A and team B and team A's loss was to 12-0 team X and team B's loss was to KU it wouldn't matter?No. I would want to know who the teams beat. Team B would be Big 12 champs and would likely have the better wins.I agree SOS is important but if SOS is pretty much equal between two teams with one loss you need to look at the lossIf the schedules were equal, team B would have a win over an 11-1 team and clearly be the best team in its conference. Team A would just be 2nd best. I really don't care that team A was better than Kansas, and the committee shouldn't, either.I think you're assuming A and B are in the same conference and played each other but they couldn't be,one would have two losses.I just think if you have two one loss teams and they both have played really close SOS"s you have to look at the loss and if one of them lost to a really crap school the other should get the nod If the schedules are truly equal, then the team with the worst loss should get the nod, because that means they have more good wins. Nobody should give a crap about a game against a team like Kansas.If you lose to KU you should be forced to give up football
Pretty sure this guy is a respect.http://www.cbssports.com/collegefootball/eye-on-college-football/24778891/tomorrows-top-25-today-week-10
K-State/TCU on FOX crushed head-to-head by OSU/MSU and Alabama/LSU. Probably would have done better at Noon on FS1: http://t.co/57WntvaPBl— Paulsen (@paulsen_smw) November 10, 2014
K-State/TCU on FOX crushed head-to-head by OSU/MSU and Alabama/LSU. Probably would have done better at Noon on FS1: http://t.co/57WntvaPBl
http://www.foxsports.com/southwest/story/big-12-power-rankings-post-spring-042815