Well if this is the "official" Frank/BW/JC thread...
@Trim
I see.
I haven't been posting that long, here's my 2 cents fwiw (which is probably less than 2 cents)...
1) Frank Martin inherited a team and recruits. Damn good ones, too. Just like oscar has inherited/is inheriting players.
2) Their win percentage is pretty comparable.
3) BW has more experience coaching college basketball.
4) I legitimately think that BW is a pretty good fit for K-State.
And I will mention that the last head coach we had that coached at So. Illinois turned out pretty good. Although that coach has no real connection to the current. I'm just hoping that the basketball gods shine their light on our little coliseum on the prairie once again.
I like Currie. Why? $$$. I say that being fully aware of the backlash you guys can dish out.
1) Frank had a little something to do w/that. Frank has no history of taking some other dude's guys that he had nothing to do with, coasting on them for a little bit, and then failing. oscar does.
2) Yep, Weber built himself a nice safety net of a W-L record before torpedoing Illinois.
3) Sure. Do not give a eff. Frank has experience making us all happy and winning games here at K-State where it hadn't been done in a really long time, but that's not necessarily important under this regime.
4) You've been talking to Gene Keady haven't you? Either way, why? I'm K-State, and I think oscar Weber's a dork who, as rising star SPBT would say, can get mumped.
And I will mention I don't know who the eff you're talking about or what relevance that would have, which I see you acknowledged. I don't like hoping, I like winning. We had that.
If you're saying you think Currie would be a good financial adviser or CFO with your "$$$," great. Me, Frank and OBz don't like him because he's a douche and he's rough ridin' with our K-State.
But hey, everyone's entitled to their opinion.