0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:27:26 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:18:32 PMConf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.If you are going to do that, you'll find that Pullen's "regression" from his FR to SO year in conf only stats was similar (if not worse) in nearly every single area you are comparing. I'm not saying WIll will be Pullen, but sophmore guards with increased roles tend to have some regressions in their numbers. Sure, I'll buy the sophomore slump. Then show me all the improvement beyond soph year guys not named Pullen have made under Frank.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:18:32 PMConf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.If you are going to do that, you'll find that Pullen's "regression" from his FR to SO year in conf only stats was similar (if not worse) in nearly every single area you are comparing. I'm not saying WIll will be Pullen, but sophmore guards with increased roles tend to have some regressions in their numbers.
Conf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:49:31 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:27:26 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:18:32 PMConf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.If you are going to do that, you'll find that Pullen's "regression" from his FR to SO year in conf only stats was similar (if not worse) in nearly every single area you are comparing. I'm not saying WIll will be Pullen, but sophmore guards with increased roles tend to have some regressions in their numbers. Sure, I'll buy the sophomore slump. Then show me all the improvement beyond soph year guys not named Pullen have made under Frank.It’s tough to show/give examples of development into your jr and senior years when the roster gets frank’d. Assuming jamar makes it a few more weeks, he and Pullen the only Fr to Sr players under Martin? (which is a bit misleading because frank is just a 5th year coach, so he’s only had 2 classes that would reach full maturity – though I don’t believe a juco player has made it 2 years or full term under frank either).
Quote from: catzacker on February 14, 2012, 12:54:55 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:49:31 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:27:26 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:18:32 PMConf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.If you are going to do that, you'll find that Pullen's "regression" from his FR to SO year in conf only stats was similar (if not worse) in nearly every single area you are comparing. I'm not saying WIll will be Pullen, but sophmore guards with increased roles tend to have some regressions in their numbers. Sure, I'll buy the sophomore slump. Then show me all the improvement beyond soph year guys not named Pullen have made under Frank.It’s tough to show/give examples of development into your jr and senior years when the roster gets frank’d. Assuming jamar makes it a few more weeks, he and Pullen the only Fr to Sr players under Martin? (which is a bit misleading because frank is just a 5th year coach, so he’s only had 2 classes that would reach full maturity – though I don’t believe a juco player has made it 2 years or full term under frank either). Tay is on a bad stretch right now, but he's better this year in nearly every category.
Some may say that Rodney has improved.
Quote from: Underdog Wildcat on February 14, 2012, 12:26:23 PMQuote from: michigancatAnd I think it goes back further than just last spring. By the time you get to spring it's too late. Which is exactly why I originally said, it's a tough situation 3 years in the making.And I realize he's probably the exception more than the rule, but Pierre Jackson was available last Spring.But probably LOL at trying to out-recruit Baylor.Disclaimer: this is not an excuse. But I think having Pullen hurt PG recruiting while he was here. It was pretty evident that he wasn't going to give up his spot.And how many impact Juco PG's are there available in any given spring?
Quote from: michigancatAnd I think it goes back further than just last spring. By the time you get to spring it's too late. Which is exactly why I originally said, it's a tough situation 3 years in the making.And I realize he's probably the exception more than the rule, but Pierre Jackson was available last Spring.But probably LOL at trying to out-recruit Baylor.
And I think it goes back further than just last spring. By the time you get to spring it's too late.
Quote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 12:58:28 PMSome may say that Rodney has improved.Kougs is not one of these people.
Quote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 01:02:55 PMQuote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 12:58:28 PMSome may say that Rodney has improved.Kougs is not one of these people.Not necessarily true. Like I said, depends on what area you're looking at.
I already said 'Tay has improved, but his PT is going to nil, despite the fact that he isn't really on a "bad stretch" lately.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:10:51 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:04:45 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 11:59:46 AMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 11:53:27 AMSpradling has regressed, beyond just shooting. If 'Tay has gotten better, we certainly aren't cashing in on that, are we? JO? GMAFB. Maybe "Jamar is Jamar" because Frank failed to improve him.I think McGruder is the same, just has more of a role without Pullz.Please, tell me how Sprads has regressed in other ways. A% down.TO% up.And then of course there is his shooting, which is worse in every measurable way.Yeah, those numbers are down, but they aren't alarming to me. I think the biggest thing Will has adjusted with is much more responsibility defensively. He is being asked to guard much better players this year and I think fatigue is catching him. I think he can work through it and be better next year. No doubt, the regression shooting has been more dramatic than I anticipated and is disappointing.Listen, I'm still a Frankite through and through, but I think there is reason for concern for the next couple years.Pullen's improvement was awesome, naturally, but I don't think you can point to anyone else and prove marked development / improvement. That is concerning to me.But couldn't 'that be a failing of Underwood or Figger or whomever?
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:04:45 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 11:59:46 AMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 11:53:27 AMSpradling has regressed, beyond just shooting. If 'Tay has gotten better, we certainly aren't cashing in on that, are we? JO? GMAFB. Maybe "Jamar is Jamar" because Frank failed to improve him.I think McGruder is the same, just has more of a role without Pullz.Please, tell me how Sprads has regressed in other ways. A% down.TO% up.And then of course there is his shooting, which is worse in every measurable way.Yeah, those numbers are down, but they aren't alarming to me. I think the biggest thing Will has adjusted with is much more responsibility defensively. He is being asked to guard much better players this year and I think fatigue is catching him. I think he can work through it and be better next year. No doubt, the regression shooting has been more dramatic than I anticipated and is disappointing.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 11:59:46 AMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 11:53:27 AMSpradling has regressed, beyond just shooting. If 'Tay has gotten better, we certainly aren't cashing in on that, are we? JO? GMAFB. Maybe "Jamar is Jamar" because Frank failed to improve him.I think McGruder is the same, just has more of a role without Pullz.Please, tell me how Sprads has regressed in other ways. A% down.TO% up.And then of course there is his shooting, which is worse in every measurable way.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 11:53:27 AMSpradling has regressed, beyond just shooting. If 'Tay has gotten better, we certainly aren't cashing in on that, are we? JO? GMAFB. Maybe "Jamar is Jamar" because Frank failed to improve him.I think McGruder is the same, just has more of a role without Pullz.Please, tell me how Sprads has regressed in other ways.
Spradling has regressed, beyond just shooting. If 'Tay has gotten better, we certainly aren't cashing in on that, are we? JO? GMAFB. Maybe "Jamar is Jamar" because Frank failed to improve him.I think McGruder is the same, just has more of a role without Pullz.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:57:30 PMQuote from: catzacker on February 14, 2012, 12:54:55 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:49:31 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:27:26 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:18:32 PMConf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.If you are going to do that, you'll find that Pullen's "regression" from his FR to SO year in conf only stats was similar (if not worse) in nearly every single area you are comparing. I'm not saying WIll will be Pullen, but sophmore guards with increased roles tend to have some regressions in their numbers. Sure, I'll buy the sophomore slump. Then show me all the improvement beyond soph year guys not named Pullen have made under Frank.It’s tough to show/give examples of development into your jr and senior years when the roster gets frank’d. Assuming jamar makes it a few more weeks, he and Pullen the only Fr to Sr players under Martin? (which is a bit misleading because frank is just a 5th year coach, so he’s only had 2 classes that would reach full maturity – though I don’t believe a juco player has made it 2 years or full term under frank either). Tay is on a bad stretch right now, but he's better this year in nearly every category.I already said 'Tay has improved, but his PT is going to nil, despite the fact that he isn't really on a "bad stretch" lately.McGruder is better in some areas, worse in others.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 01:01:55 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:57:30 PMQuote from: catzacker on February 14, 2012, 12:54:55 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:49:31 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:27:26 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:18:32 PMConf. games only. Don't care about what he did in December.If you are going to do that, you'll find that Pullen's "regression" from his FR to SO year in conf only stats was similar (if not worse) in nearly every single area you are comparing. I'm not saying WIll will be Pullen, but sophmore guards with increased roles tend to have some regressions in their numbers. Sure, I'll buy the sophomore slump. Then show me all the improvement beyond soph year guys not named Pullen have made under Frank.It’s tough to show/give examples of development into your jr and senior years when the roster gets frank’d. Assuming jamar makes it a few more weeks, he and Pullen the only Fr to Sr players under Martin? (which is a bit misleading because frank is just a 5th year coach, so he’s only had 2 classes that would reach full maturity – though I don’t believe a juco player has made it 2 years or full term under frank either). Tay is on a bad stretch right now, but he's better this year in nearly every category.I already said 'Tay has improved, but his PT is going to nil, despite the fact that he isn't really on a "bad stretch" lately.McGruder is better in some areas, worse in others.I wish Tay played more. He seems to do some pretty good things whenever he is in the game.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:14:03 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 12:10:51 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 12:04:45 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 11:59:46 AMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 11:53:27 AMSpradling has regressed, beyond just shooting. If 'Tay has gotten better, we certainly aren't cashing in on that, are we? JO? GMAFB. Maybe "Jamar is Jamar" because Frank failed to improve him.I think McGruder is the same, just has more of a role without Pullz.Please, tell me how Sprads has regressed in other ways. A% down.TO% up.And then of course there is his shooting, which is worse in every measurable way.Yeah, those numbers are down, but they aren't alarming to me. I think the biggest thing Will has adjusted with is much more responsibility defensively. He is being asked to guard much better players this year and I think fatigue is catching him. I think he can work through it and be better next year. No doubt, the regression shooting has been more dramatic than I anticipated and is disappointing.Listen, I'm still a Frankite through and through, but I think there is reason for concern for the next couple years.Pullen's improvement was awesome, naturally, but I don't think you can point to anyone else and prove marked development / improvement. That is concerning to me.But couldn't 'that be a failing of Underwood or Figger or whomever?Colon, JO, Irving, McGruder, Kent, and Clemente all showed major improvement under Martin's staff.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 01:01:55 PMI already said 'Tay has improved, but his PT is going to nil, despite the fact that he isn't really on a "bad stretch" lately.Two games. And Tay has been around Frank plenty, I'm sure he knows exactly why he isn't playing and I expect him to respond well.And I don't know if you really believe the arguments you are trying to create or if you are just BBSing around.
Quote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 01:09:15 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 01:01:55 PMI already said 'Tay has improved, but his PT is going to nil, despite the fact that he isn't really on a "bad stretch" lately.Two games. And Tay has been around Frank plenty, I'm sure he knows exactly why he isn't playing and I expect him to respond well.And I don't know if you really believe the arguments you are trying to create or if you are just BBSing around.Four.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:06:47 PMQuote from: ksu_FAN on February 14, 2012, 01:09:15 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 01:01:55 PMI already said 'Tay has improved, but his PT is going to nil, despite the fact that he isn't really on a "bad stretch" lately.Two games. And Tay has been around Frank plenty, I'm sure he knows exactly why he isn't playing and I expect him to respond well.And I don't know if you really believe the arguments you are trying to create or if you are just BBSing around.Four.aTm and Tech had drops in PT, but not as dramatic as UT and KU.
In conference play...Highest eFG% among guards:Martavious IrvingHighest 3PT%:Martavious Irving
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:17:04 PMIn conference play...Highest eFG% among guards:Martavious IrvingHighest 3PT%:Martavious IrvingSit McGruder, play Tay!
Quote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:17:04 PMIn conference play...Highest eFG% among guards:Martavious IrvingHighest 3PT%:Martavious IrvingSit McGruder, play Tay!Don't be respected. Southwell and Spradling have plenty to give.
Quote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:21:27 PMQuote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:17:04 PMIn conference play...Highest eFG% among guards:Martavious IrvingHighest 3PT%:Martavious IrvingSit McGruder, play Tay!Don't be respected. Southwell and Spradling have plenty to give.Do they?
Quote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 02:26:10 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:21:27 PMQuote from: michigancat on February 14, 2012, 02:18:44 PMQuote from: kougar24 on February 14, 2012, 02:17:04 PMIn conference play...Highest eFG% among guards:Martavious IrvingHighest 3PT%:Martavious IrvingSit McGruder, play Tay!Don't be respected. Southwell and Spradling have plenty to give.Do they?They do.