Author Topic: Obama sez No to Keystone  (Read 43042 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #200 on: November 16, 2014, 09:08:14 AM »
Why is Obama the final say on a pipeline? 
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 56103
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #201 on: November 16, 2014, 09:57:32 AM »
Why is Obama the final say on a pipeline?

The renderings of elected despotism?


Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #202 on: November 16, 2014, 01:09:31 PM »
I'm serious. How did interstate pipeline become something the president approves?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #203 on: November 16, 2014, 03:32:23 PM »
I'm serious. How did interstate pipeline become something the president approves?

the project would require the review/approval of a number of executive branches anyways (depts of interior, energy, epa, etc), but because it crosses an international border it also falls under the review of the dept. of state.  the dept. of the state's review is by far the broadest in scope.  the dept. of the state decides if the project is in the nation's interest.

the president heads the executive branch of government and has final authority over the executive departments and agencies.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #204 on: November 16, 2014, 03:48:00 PM »
Gawd, our president sucks so hard
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 65902
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #205 on: November 16, 2014, 04:13:16 PM »
 :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #206 on: November 16, 2014, 08:09:03 PM »
:lol:

You've really been off your pit game lately. What gives?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 65902
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #207 on: November 16, 2014, 09:52:57 PM »
:lol:

You've really been off your pit game lately. What gives?

you got annihilated by sys and your response was "gawd, our president sucks so hard", excuse me for finding that very  :lol: worthy

 :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #208 on: November 17, 2014, 12:15:27 AM »
:lol:

You've really been off your pit game lately. What gives?

you got annihilated by sys and your response was "gawd, our president sucks so hard", excuse me for finding that very  :lol: worthy
I'm
 :lol:

Wut?
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #209 on: November 18, 2014, 06:50:39 PM »
 So the senate voted on the keystone today but fell one short of the needed 60 votes (59 voted yes).  Is presume this is some legislative remedy around the administrative roadblock and why B.O. is the final say (via veto).
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #210 on: November 18, 2014, 08:27:45 PM »
Is presume this is some legislative remedy around the administrative roadblock and why B.O. is the final say (via veto).


Quote
the Keystone XL bill will not let any other pipelines that cross international borders bypass the State Department's permitting process.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/18/another-reason-to-be-outraged-over-congress-keystone-bill-it-gives-one-company-special-treatment/
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #211 on: November 18, 2014, 08:50:50 PM »
Sys is a great research assistant.  :combofan:
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #212 on: November 18, 2014, 09:56:31 PM »
So the senate voted on the keystone today but fell one short of the needed 60 votes (59 voted yes).  Is presume this is some legislative remedy around the administrative roadblock and why B.O. is the final say (via veto).

One last hurrah for the lame duck Dem majority. The vote was calculated to fall exactly one vote short, but next session I don't think they'll have 41 votes. It will finally land on Obama's desk. But at this point, the issue is making the entire Dem party look silly, not just Obama.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 65902
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #213 on: November 18, 2014, 10:01:40 PM »
god damn calculating dems  :curse:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline renocat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5971
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #214 on: November 18, 2014, 10:22:00 PM »
 I am afraid environmentalists will sue and tie this up in court no matter what Congress does.  Most people do not realize that most enviromental laws have citizen lawsuits provisions that the public can use to force the government to enforce law and regulation standards.  Also Native Americans say the pipeline will cross their sovereign nation and will sue also.   Meanwhile,  Canada will likely determine Marvy Superhero Envirohole Obama will fight this because conservatives want it, and build a trans-Canada to an eastern seaport to ship oil out in tankers, likely to China.  China will burn the hell out it and pollute the air.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40815
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #215 on: November 18, 2014, 11:44:52 PM »
it's been a long-time since keystone xl was proposed, people haven't been just sitting around waiting for it.  there's oil coming south now, and numerous planned/proposed new pipelines and expansions.  at a minimum, expansion of transmountain and expansion of the alberta clipper seem likely (to me) to go through no matter what happens with keystone xl.  each would have about the same capacity as keystone xl.

the oil isn't going to be stranded.
"a garden city man wondered in april if the theologians had not made a mistake in locating the garden of eden in asia rather than in the arkansas river valley."

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #216 on: November 19, 2014, 08:35:51 AM »
god damn calculating dems  :curse:

Why are you mad about it? I just think it's funny that the media reports this "it failed by a single vote" BS as if it was that close to passing! :lol: The votes are decided ahead of time, allowing as many vulnerable Dems as possible to vote in favor of popular legislation while still ensuring that the bill is defeated to appease the activist base that is so contrary to public opinion. Hell, they probably draw straws for all I know.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline 8manpick

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 19140
  • A top quartile binger, poster, and friend
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #217 on: November 19, 2014, 09:16:00 AM »
Is presume this is some legislative remedy around the administrative roadblock and why B.O. is the final say (via veto).


Quote
the Keystone XL bill will not let any other pipelines that cross international borders bypass the State Department's permitting process.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/11/18/another-reason-to-be-outraged-over-congress-keystone-bill-it-gives-one-company-special-treatment/
That seems like a really bad thing, why would people want that passed?
:adios:

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 52641
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #218 on: November 19, 2014, 09:44:30 AM »
We gotta re-write the constitution to stop allowing our democratically elected leaders to vote on stuff

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #219 on: November 19, 2014, 10:34:57 AM »
We gotta re-write the constitution to stop allowing our democratically elected leaders to vote on stuff

Amendment is a pain on the ass. Just ignore it like our president (the constitutional law "scholar") does.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #220 on: November 19, 2014, 10:39:29 AM »
seven, Obama is now a confirmed ideologue, as in "the end justifies the means". Ideologues, by definition, don't compromise.

What is his "end" that you're perceiving here?  What will he burn the country to the ground to accomplish?
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 52641
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #221 on: November 19, 2014, 01:08:51 PM »
seven, Obama is now a confirmed ideologue, as in "the end justifies the means". Ideologues, by definition, don't compromise.

What is his "end" that you're perceiving here?  What will he burn the country to the ground to accomplish?

Destroying the American way of life

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7753
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #222 on: November 19, 2014, 01:23:23 PM »
seven, Obama is now a confirmed ideologue, as in "the end justifies the means". Ideologues, by definition, don't compromise.

What is his "end" that you're perceiving here?  What will he burn the country to the ground to accomplish?

The end was Obamacare and the means involved intentionally lying to you about what the bill really was and is.

Offline Mr Bread

  • We Gave You Bruce
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 7867
  • I've distressing news.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #223 on: November 19, 2014, 03:48:30 PM »
So in your mind he's going to veto this pipeline bill coming up to save obamacare? 
My prescience is fully engorged.  It throbs with righteous accuracy.  I am sated.

Offline Spracne

  • Point Plank'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *
  • Posts: 22421
  • Scholar/Gentleman, But Super Earthy/Organic
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #224 on: November 19, 2014, 03:49:55 PM »
Maybe he just really, really likes Miller Lite?  Ain't nothin' wrong with that.
Tapatalk-only users have small wangs that they use on their mommas. #Pete2028