Author Topic: Obama sez No to Keystone  (Read 39970 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7649
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #250 on: January 30, 2015, 04:26:03 PM »
I think the 60+ avoids a filibuster.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #251 on: February 24, 2015, 04:33:54 PM »
It's official. Obama puts his radical ideology before jobs and commerce. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2015/02/24/obama-keystone-veto/23879735/
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7649
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #252 on: February 24, 2015, 06:32:29 PM »
Largest shovel ready infrastructure project ready to go and he says "no".

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #253 on: February 24, 2015, 07:56:49 PM »
What an bad person
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40547
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #254 on: February 25, 2015, 12:36:14 AM »
foolish.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7649
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #255 on: February 25, 2015, 01:25:15 AM »
Also privately funded and would generate millions in tax revenue for decades to come.

Offline slackcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1765
  • worst ever
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #256 on: February 25, 2015, 05:05:34 AM »
Also privately funded and would generate millions in tax revenue for decades to come.

In Red states.  Purely political

Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7649
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #257 on: February 25, 2015, 09:05:09 AM »
Also privately funded and would generate millions in tax revenue for decades to come.

In Red states.  Purely political

Yup, brownback has proven red states don't need tax revenue.

Offline slackcat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1765
  • worst ever
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #258 on: February 25, 2015, 09:43:11 AM »
Also privately funded and would generate millions in tax revenue for decades to come.

In Red states.  Purely political

Yup, brownback has proven red states don't need tax revenue.

Hence the refund.

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #259 on: February 25, 2015, 03:34:56 PM »
I think the 60+ avoids a filibuster.

Off topic here but will you mention this to Dax.  I don't think he quite understands this when he's doing one of his diatribes. 

Offline Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!)

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 18431
  • Kiss my ass and suck my dick
    • View Profile
    • I am the one and only Sugar Dick
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #260 on: February 25, 2015, 08:52:07 PM »
Headinjun might be confusing filibuster with overriding the veto.

Regardless, another petty and pathetic move from a failed loser
goEMAW Karmic BBS Shepherd

Offline Headinjun

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1226
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #261 on: February 25, 2015, 11:28:27 PM »
I've talked about filibusters?

Weird.

In your diatribes you complain that Obama had both houses of congress at one point but fail to acknowledge this  2/3rds majority requirement. 


Offline john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7649
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #262 on: February 26, 2015, 01:09:20 AM »
I've talked about filibusters?

Weird.

In your diatribes you complain that Obama had both houses of congress at one point but fail to acknowledge this  2/3rds majority requirement.

Obama had a filibuster proof democrat majority in the senate, but his ideas were so shitty he could never achieve it without buying democrat votes.

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #263 on: February 26, 2015, 05:48:18 AM »
I for one support Obama making America more energy secure!!! Its time we have a president that puts America and its security first. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14980
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #264 on: February 26, 2015, 07:40:22 AM »
wut?  More energy secure?

We already have a ton of pipelines, what's one more?  Why is this one such a big deal and the rest aren't?



[attachment deleted by admin]

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #265 on: February 26, 2015, 07:52:08 AM »
wut?  More energy secure?

We already have a ton of pipelines, what's one more?  Why is this one such a big deal and the rest aren't?

Fact: The companies that want this built say it will hurt domestic gas prices. 
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14980
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #266 on: February 26, 2015, 08:30:45 AM »
wut?  More energy secure?

We already have a ton of pipelines, what's one more?  Why is this one such a big deal and the rest aren't?

Fact: The companies that want this built say it will hurt domestic gas prices.

Meh...  Seems like such a petty thing for liberals to take such a hard line on.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #267 on: February 26, 2015, 08:38:21 AM »
wut?  More energy secure?

We already have a ton of pipelines, what's one more?  Why is this one such a big deal and the rest aren't?

I think you know the answer to that.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21338
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #268 on: February 26, 2015, 09:50:27 AM »
wierd that the president would dig in on something the next president would probably pass instantly, also dumb that the congress insists on spending their time on something that they knew 100% would get vetoed. how about do some actual work instead.

Offline Institutional Control

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 14980
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #269 on: February 26, 2015, 09:58:52 AM »
wierd that the president would dig in on something the next president would probably pass instantly, also dumb that the congress insists on spending their time on something that they knew 100% would get vetoed. how about do some actual work instead.

Well, how many times have they voted to repeal Obamacare?  They don't care about anything but symbolism.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #270 on: February 26, 2015, 09:59:09 AM »
wierd that the president would dig in on something the next president would probably pass instantly, also dumb that the congress insists on spending their time on something that they knew 100% would get vetoed. how about do some actual work instead.

It is actual work. They at least have an obligation to put common sense legislation on his desk. It is not their fault that the President is a radical.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline K-S-U-Wildcats!

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 10040
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #271 on: February 26, 2015, 10:01:57 AM »
wierd that the president would dig in on something the next president would probably pass instantly, also dumb that the congress insists on spending their time on something that they knew 100% would get vetoed. how about do some actual work instead.

Well, how many times have they voted to repeal Obamacare?  They don't care about anything but symbolism.

Again, see above. But in the case of Obamacare, Republicans need to propose a legislative means of transitioning away from Obamacare and back to the free markets, something they have still failed to agree on because of their rank incompetency. So I would agree that, until Republicans actually have a piece of coherent legislation on replacing Obamacare, their "repeal" votes are moronic. If they ever get their act together, they absolutely need to put the legislation on Obama's desk, veto or not. That's part of the constitutional process. It is the consequence of twice-electing a radical liberal idealogue, but he must at least be made to exercise his veto power.
I've said it before and I'll say it again, K-State fans could have beheaded the entire KU team at midcourt, and K-State fans would be celebrating it this morning.  They are the ISIS of Big 12 fanbases.

Offline EMAWican

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1202
  • 'Murica
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #272 on: February 26, 2015, 11:07:50 AM »
I still enjoy it when someone mentions that the Keystone shouldn't be allowed through Kansas, and all up in arms getting ready to chain themselves to a backhoe. Then I tell them that it was installed and finished in Kansas like four years ago.

Offline Dugout DickStone

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 51648
  • BSPAC
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #273 on: February 26, 2015, 11:12:52 AM »
I still enjoy it when someone mentions that the Keystone shouldn't be allowed through Kansas, and all up in arms getting ready to chain themselves to a backhoe. Then I tell them that it was installed and finished in Kansas like four years ago.

You enjoy weird crap.

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 64215
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: Obama sez No to Keystone
« Reply #274 on: February 26, 2015, 11:32:00 AM »
Easily enjoyed
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite