This week all the bulletin boards are hot off the presses with discussions of schemes. Schemes are the hot thing to talk about right now in America. Why? Well, it's obvious for anyone who watched K-State dismantle the Miami Hurricanes last Saturday that schemes played a major role in the dismantling. Why? Well- let's pretend for a minute that you are a white kid that Perry Ellis played against in high school in 'Ta Town. And Miami is Perry Ellis. I don't think anyone needs an electron microsope to see the talent disparity between the two programs here, hehe.
So what was the difference? Schemes. Our scheme was better than their scheme? Yes,- no doubt about it. LHCBS knows that a solid/proven scheme will beat the more talent laden program every single time. OU, 03, consider yourself schemed sooner losers. I can't imagine a better display of proper schemes being implemented in college sports than LHC Bill Snyder and his band of merry schemers.
*So- this begs the question: When the other team expects you to scheme, is the best scheme no scheme at all? Do you scheme the scheme with the lack of a scheme? And does the lack of a scheme qualify as a scheme? What about if the other team is expecting a great scheme so they develop a great scheme to counter yours and yet you come with a really bad scheme- which scheme trumps the other scheme?