Author Topic: The Official Bracketology Thread  (Read 367289 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline puniraptor

  • Tastemaker
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21335
  • nostalgic reason
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #275 on: January 09, 2014, 01:26:52 PM »
we will always be in a bracket with wisconsin. it's hopeless to dream otherwise.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44810
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #276 on: January 10, 2014, 10:00:31 AM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

They did that last year

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29139
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #277 on: January 10, 2014, 10:01:37 AM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

They did that last year

yeah, we definitely interrupted the crap out of that joke

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #278 on: January 13, 2014, 10:54:53 AM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #279 on: January 13, 2014, 11:07:54 AM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology

we would make it to the E8 in that bracket.

Offline ksu101

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #280 on: January 13, 2014, 11:52:17 AM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology
would rough ridin' take.

Offline MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 44810
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #281 on: January 13, 2014, 01:43:56 PM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology

we would make it to the E8 in that bracket.

Here's my obligatory post reminding you all that we have no size and no shooters. Wichita State and those athletic guards who play defense is an absolute matchup nightmare for us. We've played 2 teams this season who are interested in playing defense and they both completely embarrassed us.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #282 on: January 13, 2014, 01:44:58 PM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology

we would make it to the E8 in that bracket.

Here's my obligatory post reminding you all that we have no size and no shooters. Wichita State and those athletic guards who play defense is an absolute matchup nightmare for us. We've played 2 teams this season who are interested in playing defense and they both completely embarrassed us.

Nope, E8.

Offline kso_FAN

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29506
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #283 on: January 13, 2014, 01:50:53 PM »
Here's my obligatory post reminding you all that we have no size and no shooters. Wichita State and those athletic guards who play defense is an absolute matchup nightmare for us. We've played 2 teams this season who are interested in playing defense and they both completely embarrassed us.

I think if we played Georgetown again we could compete, I think this team is much better than we played that day.

I want no part of a team like KU though. KU, BU, and UT are the worst match-ups for us in this league because they have so much length. If we can win 2 games from those 6 games I'll be pretty pleased.

I haven't watched enough WSU to know, they aren't a huge team though. Their defense would be tough.

Offline ksu101

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 570
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #284 on: January 13, 2014, 03:26:16 PM »
If the committee has any sense of humor they'll match up either K-State or KU with Wichita State, even it isn't until the S16.

http://www.cbssports.com/collegebasketball/bracketology

we would make it to the E8 in that bracket.
Here's my obligatory post reminding you all that we have no size and no shooters. Wichita State and those athletic guards who play defense is an absolute matchup nightmare for us. We've played 2 teams this season who are interested in playing defense and they both completely embarrassed us.
mid major tho

Offline Powercat Posse

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4585
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #285 on: January 13, 2014, 07:36:52 PM »
10 seed is where I would have us right now.   

The top 4 teams in the Big 12 should be in the 2-4 seed range like CBS has it.

6 seed may be a little high for OU.   Good win vs Clonies but they don't have a signature win in the non con

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #286 on: January 16, 2014, 10:02:26 AM »

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #287 on: January 16, 2014, 11:23:25 AM »

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #288 on: January 16, 2014, 11:29:50 AM »
10 seed is where I would have us right now.   

The top 4 teams in the Big 12 should be in the 2-4 seed range like CBS has it.

6 seed may be a little high for OU.   Good win vs Clonies but they don't have a signature win in the non con

whoever wins the big 12 (KU) will be a 1...
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline Mixed-Nutz

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Square
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #289 on: January 16, 2014, 11:32:26 AM »
Here's my obligatory post reminding you all that we have no size and no shooters. Wichita State and those athletic guards who play defense is an absolute matchup nightmare for us. We've played 2 teams this season who are interested in playing defense and they both completely embarrassed us.

I think if we played Georgetown again we could compete, I think this team is much better than we played that day.

I want no part of a team like KU though. KU, BU, and UT are the worst match-ups for us in this league because they have so much length. If we can win 2 games from those 6 games I'll be pretty pleased.

I haven't watched enough WSU to know, they aren't a huge team though. Their defense would be tough.
Baylor's lack of fundamental basketball neutralizes any advantage of length. Hard to mark plays when you are never in the right spot.

Offline scottwildcat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16430
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #290 on: January 16, 2014, 11:51:15 AM »

Online BIG APPLE CAT

  • smelly poor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • slide rule enthusiast
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #291 on: January 16, 2014, 12:00:04 PM »
is there a team in that west bracket that we won't have played at least once this year?

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16725
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #292 on: January 16, 2014, 12:03:25 PM »
is there a team in that west bracket that we won't have played at least once this year?

yeah like, 12 of them, but those bottom 4 are kind of funny.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16725
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #293 on: January 16, 2014, 12:43:18 PM »

Offline The Tonya Harding of Twitter Users Creep

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9740
    • View Profile
I think what my friend Mitch is trying to say is that true love is blind.

Offline TownieCat

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 6993
  • I have no rhythm.
    • View Profile

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17072
    • View Profile

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7085
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #297 on: January 16, 2014, 02:22:08 PM »
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline Lucas Scoopsalot

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2757
    • View Profile
Re: The Official Bracketology Thread
« Reply #298 on: January 16, 2014, 02:26:39 PM »
http://dailybracket.wordpress.com/

 :surprised:
any bracket that doesn't include us in the same region as Wisconsin is irrelevant.
Luke's stock is rising as Winters continues to validate his greatness. Add Luke and Winters to my list! Also, EMAWBLAST! and Tobias!

Offline PowercatPat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4427
  • #BID
    • View Profile