There is no better definition of a hypothesis than the big bang...
The Big Bang is not a hypothesis. It's a scientific theory and model supported by a vast amount of evidence and observation. Please don't try to make statements about science if you don't know what the hell you're talking about.
I was raised as a Catholic, but I never enjoyed being one. I hated the authoritarianism of the religion, its texts and its hierarchy. I questioned its central tenets. I hated church. And yet I still believed in God, Heaven and Hell, because their existence was never questioned, they was just taken for granted. As a result, I was miserable, always afraid I would make God unhappy and end up in hell. Worse, I started having doubts about God's existence, which would definitely land me in hell if God did exist.
I'm sorry that you feel the way the you do, but it is easy to see through what you're saying. You don't like the Catholic church, I don't either. A lot going on there is unnecessary and distracting and does not get to the core message of Christianity. I suggest you look into what Christianity really is.
I've looked extensively into many forms of Christianity. I've heard all the arguments. They're all illogical, false, and shitty.
It would be incredible if there really were a god, much more incredible than, say, discovering an advanced alien civilization. But if it were true, then why hasn't this deity made an appearance to the world? Like, "Yo, world, here I am, check out all the mind-blowing stuff I can do! I can make all the all the animals sing your favorite songs, and bring back your dead loved ones for a visit, and take away all human suffering! Make sure all your cameras are focused. Believe me now?" Don't you think an all-powerful, all-knowing, all-loving God would at least do that? It would have to be a pretty bad person god to leave such ambiguous "evidence" as nature, ancient books, and purported miracles, and leave the humans to argue and kill each other over it, and others to go to hell because the "evidence" is so flimsy that they dismiss it.
Religionists laugh at Pacific Island cargo cults, who believe a guy named John Frum is God because he delivered a whole bunch of cargo one day. Cargo cultists couldn't fathom how this big metal flying thing could bring all this awesome stuff without the answer being god. Well, followers of most mainstream religions can't fathom how all this amazing stuff got on the planet without the answer being God. They don't know (or won't accept) that it can all be explained by science. Most religions (and definitely Christian literalism) are just bigger versions of a cargo cult.
Also, lol at the people in this thread arguing about what the right version of religion is.