Poll

Will the "cool" Pinstripe Bowl K-State be on the new field at BSFS?

Yes . . . it's cool.  Currie Prevails.
NO . . . OB Wins again.

Author Topic: BSFS Expansion Thread  (Read 4588908 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pissclams

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 47927
  • (worst non-premium poster at goEMAW.com)
    • View Profile
BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4425 on: November 20, 2012, 10:14:29 PM »
i hope there's a way to build the limestone wall and not kstate0 it up with advertisements. 

i doubt very much that our AD would give up the precious revenue those stupid redneck signs provide us, but i wish we could just keep it clean.

lol, I didn't read this before I made my post
damn it I don't believe you.

I just don't think it makes sense to spend money on a wall if you're just going to ugly it up with led boards.  I would want a classic look.  but I don't like led boards much in hoops either.

are they a necessary evil? ya I suppose but I'm talking about what I would want to see.


Cheesy Mustache QB might make an appearance.

New warning: Don't get in a fight with someone who doesn't even need to bother to buy ink.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13887
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4426 on: November 20, 2012, 10:14:57 PM »
i hope there's a way to build the limestone wall and not kstate0 it up with advertisements. 

i doubt very much that our AD would give up the precious revenue those stupid redneck signs provide us, but i wish we could just keep it clean.
I hope they can move that stuff up to the video/ribbon boards.

That isn't moving anything, the ribbon boards should be generating new revenues ad higher price points.  Your proposal wouldn't be moving anything it would be completely eliminating a revenue stream.
I admit that my hopes don't make the most business sense.

Offline Panjandrum

  • 5 o'clock Shadow Enthusiast
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 11221
  • Amateur magician and certified locksmith.
    • View Profile
    • Bring on the Cats [An SB Nation Blog]
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4427 on: November 20, 2012, 10:17:55 PM »
I hope they put so many LED video boards on the field wall that it looks like the side of a stock car.

Offline Super PurpleCat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3576
  • purple hugs are back! get yours today
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4428 on: November 20, 2012, 10:43:05 PM »
Mount a bunch of skulls on the limestone wall.  Deer and cow skulls if necessary.

Offline j-von

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1632
  • Hates The Band
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4429 on: November 20, 2012, 11:26:39 PM »
i hope there's a way to build the limestone wall and not kstate0 it up with advertisements. 

i doubt very much that our AD would give up the precious revenue those stupid redneck signs provide us, but i wish we could just keep it clean.

lol, I didn't read this before I made my post
damn it I don't believe you.

I just don't think it makes sense to spend money on a wall if you're just going to ugly it up with led boards.  I would want a classic look.  but I don't like led boards much in hoops either.

are they a necessary evil? ya I suppose but I'm talking about what I would want to see.

I'd also like to see a classic look without led boards or signs and I'd like to think it might happen.  I mean, with 2 jumbo-trons, 2 led boards in the SE/SW corners, and new ribbon boards, do we really need more advertising going on at once?

Online MakeItRain

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 45929
  • big roas man
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4430 on: November 20, 2012, 11:28:29 PM »
i hope there's a way to build the limestone wall and not kstate0 it up with advertisements. 

i doubt very much that our AD would give up the precious revenue those stupid redneck signs provide us, but i wish we could just keep it clean.

lol, I didn't read this before I made my post
damn it I don't believe you.

I just don't think it makes sense to spend money on a wall if you're just going to ugly it up with led boards.  I would want a classic look.  but I don't like led boards much in hoops either.

are they a necessary evil? ya I suppose but I'm talking about what I would want to see.

I'd also like to see a classic look without led boards or signs and I'd like to think it might happen.  I mean, with 2 jumbo-trons, 2 led boards in the SE/SW corners, and new ribbon boards, do we really need more advertising going on at once?

nah, we have enough money, we're like what 8th in the conference in revenue, we're good

Offline michigancat

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 55918
  • change your stupid avatar.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4431 on: November 21, 2012, 01:30:13 AM »
Did you guys know that Michigan doesn't have ANY advertising in their stadium? Like, not even on the jumbotron. They also hate playing games that don't start at noon. They're so odd.

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 59321
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4432 on: November 21, 2012, 06:17:56 AM »
UNC doesn't have any advertising signage, albeit I do think they run a few ads for things like UNC Healthcenter on the Videoboard.


Offline Emo EMAW

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 17891
  • Unrepentant traditional emobro
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4433 on: November 21, 2012, 01:39:16 PM »
Have you guys heard of aeroponics?  If not look it up.  Anyway we could grow walls of wheat instead of limestone.  Would be like Wrigley.

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4434 on: November 21, 2012, 03:53:28 PM »
Limestone walls seems like the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to make the stadium look loads better. Like doing a tasteful upgrade on rims for the hooptie.

We've been over this before.  I seem to remember someone saying something about foundation issues, maybe a low water table.  Anyway, they said building the foundation for it would be alot more time consuming and costly than you would think.  There's alot more to it than someone just piling up some limestone and grout as if they were building a limestone fence on their property.  For the amount of $$$ it would take, there are better upgrades that could be made first and the $$$ spent would have alot bigger impact on something functional. 


I'm not saying I know, just saying I remember this has been discussed and that's what I remember without going back in the thread.

 :dubious: there's not much required for a foundation for the proposed limestone wall even if the the capacity of the soil is terrible. Want evidence? Have we had to fix any settlement issues with the lower part of the seating bowl or the field...no.

It would still likely require a frost footing, say 24" x 36".     That is, unless the current toe footing at the base of the railing is adequate, but I doubt.

No frost required, one side of the wall is not a temperature controlled space. Freeze thaw damage will only happen if drainage system is crap. Soil over the heel or toe of the footing is to prevent overturning when required and this wall is not tall.

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4435 on: November 21, 2012, 04:44:26 PM »
Limestone walls seems like the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to make the stadium look loads better. Like doing a tasteful upgrade on rims for the hooptie.

We've been over this before.  I seem to remember someone saying something about foundation issues, maybe a low water table.  Anyway, they said building the foundation for it would be alot more time consuming and costly than you would think.  There's alot more to it than someone just piling up some limestone and grout as if they were building a limestone fence on their property.  For the amount of $$$ it would take, there are better upgrades that could be made first and the $$$ spent would have alot bigger impact on something functional. 


I'm not saying I know, just saying I remember this has been discussed and that's what I remember without going back in the thread.

 :dubious: there's not much required for a foundation for the proposed limestone wall even if the the capacity of the soil is terrible. Want evidence? Have we had to fix any settlement issues with the lower part of the seating bowl or the field...no.

It would still likely require a frost footing, say 24" x 36".     That is, unless the current toe footing at the base of the railing is adequate, but I doubt.

No frost required, one side of the wall is not a temperature controlled space. Freeze thaw damage will only happen if drainage system is crap. Soil over the heel or toe of the footing is to prevent overturning when required and this wall is not tall.

huh, looky there.   
 



Frost footing is required.   Has not so much to do with temperature control, but the fact that if you do not bear below the frost line (accepted as 36" in Kansas) then frost could heave the wall and cause it to fracture and deteriorate.    Examples of such as seen below


This is what I imagine the wall would look like.   Approximately 5' above grade, on a footing, with a trench drain along the seating side to collect water.  CanConfirm did a lovely architectural rendering for me.


Offline eastcat

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2502
  • Labeled by children.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4436 on: November 21, 2012, 04:54:02 PM »
Limestone walls seems like the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to make the stadium look loads better. Like doing a tasteful upgrade on rims for the hooptie.

We've been over this before.  I seem to remember someone saying something about foundation issues, maybe a low water table.  Anyway, they said building the foundation for it would be alot more time consuming and costly than you would think.  There's alot more to it than someone just piling up some limestone and grout as if they were building a limestone fence on their property.  For the amount of $$$ it would take, there are better upgrades that could be made first and the $$$ spent would have alot bigger impact on something functional. 


I'm not saying I know, just saying I remember this has been discussed and that's what I remember without going back in the thread.

 :dubious: there's not much required for a foundation for the proposed limestone wall even if the the capacity of the soil is terrible. Want evidence? Have we had to fix any settlement issues with the lower part of the seating bowl or the field...no.

It would still likely require a frost footing, say 24" x 36".     That is, unless the current toe footing at the base of the railing is adequate, but I doubt.

No frost required, one side of the wall is not a temperature controlled space. Freeze thaw damage will only happen if drainage system is crap. Soil over the heel or toe of the footing is to prevent overturning when required and this wall is not tall.

huh, looky there.   
 



Frost footing is required.   Has not so much to do with temperature control, but the fact that if you do not bear below the frost line (accepted as 36" in Kansas) then frost could heave the wall and cause it to fracture and deteriorate.    Examples of such as seen below


This is what I imagine the wall would look like.   Approximately 5' above grade, on a footing, with a trench drain along the seating side to collect water.  CanConfirm did a lovely architectural rendering for me.



Wow, how much did that cost? Send these secret plans to J Currie ASAP!

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4437 on: November 21, 2012, 07:07:28 PM »
Limestone walls seems like the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to make the stadium look loads better. Like doing a tasteful upgrade on rims for the hooptie.

if we all do about 20' in MS Paint, we can do it for FREE!

We've been over this before.  I seem to remember someone saying something about foundation issues, maybe a low water table.  Anyway, they said building the foundation for it would be alot more time consuming and costly than you would think.  There's alot more to it than someone just piling up some limestone and grout as if they were building a limestone fence on their property.  For the amount of $$$ it would take, there are better upgrades that could be made first and the $$$ spent would have alot bigger impact on something functional. 


I'm not saying I know, just saying I remember this has been discussed and that's what I remember without going back in the thread.

 :dubious: there's not much required for a foundation for the proposed limestone wall even if the the capacity of the soil is terrible. Want evidence? Have we had to fix any settlement issues with the lower part of the seating bowl or the field...no.

It would still likely require a frost footing, say 24" x 36".     That is, unless the current toe footing at the base of the railing is adequate, but I doubt.

No frost required, one side of the wall is not a temperature controlled space. Freeze thaw damage will only happen if drainage system is crap. Soil over the heel or toe of the footing is to prevent overturning when required and this wall is not tall.

huh, looky there.   
 



Frost footing is required.   Has not so much to do with temperature control, but the fact that if you do not bear below the frost line (accepted as 36" in Kansas) then frost could heave the wall and cause it to fracture and deteriorate.    Examples of such as seen below


This is what I imagine the wall would look like.   Approximately 5' above grade, on a footing, with a trench drain along the seating side to collect water.  CanConfirm did a lovely architectural rendering for me.



Wow, how much did that cost? Send these secret plans to J Currie ASAP!

Online star seed 7

  • hyperactive on the :lol:
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 67309
  • good dog
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4438 on: November 21, 2012, 08:34:44 PM »
fuckin architects.... right mikey?    :bang:

 :lol:
Hyperbolic partisan duplicitous hypocrite

Offline ednksu

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 9862
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4439 on: November 21, 2012, 08:38:01 PM »
screw the people in the front row.  Build up from where the current railing is.  Cover face with limestone.
Quote from: OregonHawk
KU is right on par with Notre Dame ... when it comes to adding additional conference revenue

Quote from: Kim Carnes
Beer pro tip: never drink anything other than BL, coors, pbr, maybe a few others that I'm forgetting

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4440 on: November 21, 2012, 10:04:32 PM »
Limestone walls seems like the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to make the stadium look loads better. Like doing a tasteful upgrade on rims for the hooptie.

We've been over this before.  I seem to remember someone saying something about foundation issues, maybe a low water table.  Anyway, they said building the foundation for it would be alot more time consuming and costly than you would think.  There's alot more to it than someone just piling up some limestone and grout as if they were building a limestone fence on their property.  For the amount of $$$ it would take, there are better upgrades that could be made first and the $$$ spent would have alot bigger impact on something functional. 


I'm not saying I know, just saying I remember this has been discussed and that's what I remember without going back in the thread.

 :dubious: there's not much required for a foundation for the proposed limestone wall even if the the capacity of the soil is terrible. Want evidence? Have we had to fix any settlement issues with the lower part of the seating bowl or the field...no.

It would still likely require a frost footing, say 24" x 36".     That is, unless the current toe footing at the base of the railing is adequate, but I doubt.

No frost required, one side of the wall is not a temperature controlled space. Freeze thaw damage will only happen if drainage system is crap. Soil over the heel or toe of the footing is to prevent overturning when required and this wall is not tall.

huh, looky there.   
 



Frost footing is required.   Has not so much to do with temperature control, but the fact that if you do not bear below the frost line (accepted as 36" in Kansas) then frost could heave the wall and cause it to fracture and deteriorate.    Examples of such as seen below


This is what I imagine the wall would look like.   Approximately 5' above grade, on a footing, with a trench drain along the seating side to collect water.  CanConfirm did a lovely architectural rendering for me.



Dood, the weight of the wall would resist any heaving if the subgrade was properly prepared. The footing in your drawing just gets around subgrade prep. I'm an SE. They could also drill and epoxy the wall footing to the base of the seating bowl, and it wouldn't ever move.

Ps-the footing in your wall detail does not meet the ACI minimum requirements for reinforcement
« Last Edit: November 21, 2012, 10:11:23 PM by ArchE_Cat »

Offline GoodForAnother

  • It was all a scheme I used to read emaw magazine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6045
  • You hate to see this Mike
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4441 on: November 21, 2012, 10:20:20 PM »
awwwww crap
emaw

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4442 on: November 21, 2012, 10:26:12 PM »
Limestone walls seems like the cheapest, fastest, easiest way to make the stadium look loads better. Like doing a tasteful upgrade on rims for the hooptie.

We've been over this before.  I seem to remember someone saying something about foundation issues, maybe a low water table.  Anyway, they said building the foundation for it would be alot more time consuming and costly than you would think.  There's alot more to it than someone just piling up some limestone and grout as if they were building a limestone fence on their property.  For the amount of $$$ it would take, there are better upgrades that could be made first and the $$$ spent would have alot bigger impact on something functional. 


I'm not saying I know, just saying I remember this has been discussed and that's what I remember without going back in the thread.

 :dubious: there's not much required for a foundation for the proposed limestone wall even if the the capacity of the soil is terrible. Want evidence? Have we had to fix any settlement issues with the lower part of the seating bowl or the field...no.

It would still likely require a frost footing, say 24" x 36".     That is, unless the current toe footing at the base of the railing is adequate, but I doubt.

No frost required, one side of the wall is not a temperature controlled space. Freeze thaw damage will only happen if drainage system is crap. Soil over the heel or toe of the footing is to prevent overturning when required and this wall is not tall.

huh, looky there.   
 



Frost footing is required.   Has not so much to do with temperature control, but the fact that if you do not bear below the frost line (accepted as 36" in Kansas) then frost could heave the wall and cause it to fracture and deteriorate.    Examples of such as seen below


This is what I imagine the wall would look like.   Approximately 5' above grade, on a footing, with a trench drain along the seating side to collect water.  CanConfirm did a lovely architectural rendering for me.



Dood, the weight of the wall would resist any heaving if the subgrade was properly prepared. The footing in your drawing just gets around subgrade prep. I'm an SE. They could also drill and epoxy the wall footing to the base of the seating bowl, and it wouldn't ever move.

Ps-the footing in your wall detail does not meet the ACI minimum requirements for reinforcement

My buddy the SE who detailed the 2 walls above disagrees.    What's heavier, that wall or a building.    But the building still needs a footing, right?    So that argument makes no sense.  Frost is amazingly destructive.    If a cold winter sets in and the frost sets in good, you will see sidewalks, slabs, walls, etc. all over begin moving and cracking.    We did a job a few years ago where the frost later heaved the sidewalk outside the main entrance even though it was doweled to the footing.   We had to cut it out and replace a section of sidewalk so the doors could open.

As I said in my first post, if the existing footing is sufficient, yes, you could simply build on top of it and dowel the wall to the turndown wall on the riser.

And yeah, my reinforcing is still being detailed.

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4443 on: November 21, 2012, 10:27:29 PM »
fuckin architects.... right mikey?    :bang:

 :lol:

He's an ARE.  I started out as ARE, so I can't complain.   

Offline wabash909

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6346
  • scattered all over like seeds in the wind
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4444 on: November 21, 2012, 10:30:57 PM »
Fight, fight, fight!!!
Texas Christian University coach Gary Patterson has been hired as Kansas State's 34th football coach, multiple sources have confirmed to GoPowercat.com.  Patterson replaces Ron Prince, who was fired Wednesday. - Tim Fitzgerald   Nov, 7, 2008

Offline ArchE_Cat

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4445 on: November 21, 2012, 10:42:23 PM »
I see what you're saying about heaving. But IMO it depends completly on the soil type at the project site and the subgrade prep. Most gravity retaining walls simple have a compacted fill base that doesn't extend to frost level but only acts in bearing. BSFS show no signs of settlement or heaving at the field level where it interfaces with the first riser of the seating bowl. I just don't buy the argument that the foundation system for the proposed wall would make it cost prohibitive compared to other projects.

Frost footings on buildings create a perimeter to keep the interior subbase in a temp controlled area separated from the exterior. Interior footings don't need to extend to frost because they are not located at a location with a temperature differential. The heaving is caused by the tramp diff and gets worse with certain soils.
« Last Edit: November 21, 2012, 10:54:06 PM by ArchE_Cat »

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7173
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4446 on: November 21, 2012, 10:46:06 PM »
Can we stop nerding out? Let's all just admit its feasible to put up a limestone wall.....you know since it is part of the plan and all. No need for all you dirt experts to get into a dick measuring contest.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline Trim

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 42605
  • Pfizer PLUS Moderna and now Pfizer Bivalent
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4447 on: November 21, 2012, 10:53:52 PM »
Doom can probably get some limestone wallpaper and knock this thing out in an evening.

Offline Tobias

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 29365
  • hypoclique lieutenant
    • View Profile
BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4448 on: November 21, 2012, 10:57:10 PM »
I kinda enjoy builder bros talking about building stuff, especially when the ksu cats are involved :dunno:

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 32461
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread
« Reply #4449 on: November 21, 2012, 11:00:25 PM »
Until BSaC (hope proper usage) shows up and says otherwise I'm going to believe its not only doable, but pudder than pud.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best