Poll

Will the "cool" Pinstripe Bowl K-State be on the new field at BSFS?

Yes . . . it's cool.  Currie Prevails.
NO . . . OB Wins again.

Author Topic: BSFS Expansion Thread  (Read 4060560 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13781
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1450 on: August 01, 2011, 10:06:01 PM »
If only we had a thread to discuss the improvements being done to BSFS...

Didn't know the renovations included the killing of construction workers.

The restrooms have been christened...BSFS is appeased.

Offline Kat Kid

  • Global Moderator
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 20541
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1451 on: August 01, 2011, 10:12:21 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

incorrect.


This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.   

Quote
Employers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.

For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.

http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.html

I don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity.

the apparent plank failure is a seperate issue.

A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.

I don't know you personally, but you come off like a huge punk here.  "Plank failure?"  That is hard hat legalese if I've ever heard it.  Hope the morning pep talk goes well, Bobby Builder.

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13781
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1452 on: August 01, 2011, 10:17:39 PM »
Did someone get this on webcam?





This is almost exactly how I pictured it.  I hope they erect a statue in his honor and hide some secret Mason crap inside it that can only be found by deciphering a secret map or something.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1453 on: August 01, 2011, 10:19:54 PM »
They good news is- life insurance pays off double if it happens while on the job.   (Unless Fight Club was lying.  :shakesfist: )

Offline WillieWatanabe

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 19319
  • We'll always have Salt Lake
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1454 on: August 01, 2011, 10:27:17 PM »
Did someone get this on webcam?





put "OK_Cat" in the corner instead of goEMAW.com, imo.
Sometimes I think of the Book of Job and how God likes to really eff with people.
- chunkles

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40572
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1455 on: August 01, 2011, 10:45:29 PM »
snyder kills again.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline Stevesie60

  • Fattyfest Champion
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 17190
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1456 on: August 01, 2011, 11:18:02 PM »
They good news is- life insurance pays off double if it happens while on the job.   (Unless Fight Club was lying.  :shakesfist: )

Impossible.

Offline wes mantooth

  • freak and stud
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4137
  • #LIFE is good
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1457 on: August 02, 2011, 08:00:53 AM »
Isn't today the day dax was telling us about, BOR voting on this or something?

Offline sonofdaxjones

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 53791
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1458 on: August 02, 2011, 08:19:49 AM »
A public hearing is coming up, I believe since part of the funding for the project is going to be bonds, they have to hold a public hearing. 


Offline MeatSauce

  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 1127
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1459 on: August 02, 2011, 08:55:43 AM »
lots of people died building the pyramids, empire state building, panama canal, etc.  If anything it makes BSFS-E more distinguished, imo.

Offline 5601js

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1460 on: August 02, 2011, 09:22:24 AM »
NT
« Last Edit: August 02, 2011, 09:24:51 AM by 5601js »

Offline Belvis Noland

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3964
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1461 on: August 02, 2011, 12:12:51 PM »

A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.


Not true. 

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36812
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1462 on: August 02, 2011, 01:38:20 PM »
Pretty sure this is some sort of spiritual trade off Bill does to maintain life and some vitality.  Given how he has been looking lately, I don't know if just one will do the trick this time...

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13781
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1463 on: August 02, 2011, 02:23:30 PM »
Pretty sure this is some sort of spiritual trade off Bill does to maintain life and some vitality.  Given how he has been looking lately, I don't know if just one will do the trick this time...

Was he first to the scene?  Was the victims throat ripped out or were there paired puncture wounds?  :ohno:

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7109
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1464 on: August 02, 2011, 02:39:10 PM »
Pretty sure this is some sort of spiritual trade off Bill does to maintain life and some vitality.  Given how he has been looking lately, I don't know if just one will do the trick this time...

Was he first to the scene?  Was the victims throat ripped out or were there paired puncture wounds?  :ohno:
I think he just needs to marry a woman with green eyes.
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline 5601js

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1465 on: August 02, 2011, 02:41:16 PM »

A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.


Not true.  

yes, it is true.

It's obvious that the scaffolding system was not adequate. However, with a proper scaffolding system with guardrails, safety harnesses are not required.
http://www.osha.gov/SLTC/etools/scaffolding/supported/frame/fallprotection.html

Specifically:
   Each employee on a scaffold more than 10 feet above a lower level must be protected from falling to that lower level. [1926.451(g)(1)]

    Fall protection consists of either personal fall arrest systems or guardrail systems meeting OSHA requirements. [1926.451(g)(1)(vii)]

    Employees performing overhand bricklaying operations from a supported scaffold must be protected from falling from all open sides and ends of the scaffold, except at the side next to the wall being laid. [1926.451(g)(1)(vi)]

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16709
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1466 on: August 02, 2011, 03:35:42 PM »
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today?  Are they putting it on hold indefinitely? 
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline CNS

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 36812
  • I'm Athletes
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1467 on: August 02, 2011, 03:38:36 PM »
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today?  Are they putting it on hold indefinitely? 

Would imagine that they will be down a few days if not more for investigations/grief of other workers/etc.

Offline 5601js

  • Fan
  • *
  • Posts: 168
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1468 on: August 02, 2011, 03:43:59 PM »
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today?  Are they putting it on hold indefinitely? 

I wouldn't be surprised if they were gone for at least the rest of the week to allow the investigation to take place and give the guys a chance to clear their minds.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22301
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1469 on: August 02, 2011, 03:46:32 PM »
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today?  Are they putting it on hold indefinitely? 
I bet they hold off for a while in order to let  an investigation to occur and for the other workers to come to grips with what happened.


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1470 on: August 02, 2011, 03:48:48 PM »
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today?  Are they putting it on hold indefinitely? 

one would think that they would put everything on hold for a while so that an investigation could occur.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1471 on: August 02, 2011, 03:49:44 PM »
Did someone get this on webcam?





put "OK_Cat" in the corner instead of goEMAW.com, imo.

stop being so afraid of the outside world, willie watanabe.

Offline KITNfury

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7109
  • Eat My Ass Whole
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1472 on: August 02, 2011, 03:50:17 PM »
investigation
I once blew clove smoke in a guy's face that cut in front of me in the line to KJ's.

Offline wetwillie

  • goEMAW Poster of the WEEK
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 30608
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1473 on: August 02, 2011, 03:50:27 PM »
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today?  Are they putting it on hold indefinitely?  

rumblings of an investigation, heard from a guy that knows the employees have been offered extensive grief counseling until at least later next week.
When the bullets are flying, that's when I'm at my best

Online john "teach me how to" dougie

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 7664
  • 1cat
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1474 on: August 02, 2011, 04:02:08 PM »
Should name the restrooms after the guy.

(Name Here) Family Memorial Restrooms