0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Quote from: jtksu on August 01, 2011, 07:53:27 PMIf only we had a thread to discuss the improvements being done to BSFS...Didn't know the renovations included the killing of construction workers.
If only we had a thread to discuss the improvements being done to BSFS...
Quote from: Sundance_Kid on August 01, 2011, 09:33:36 PMQuote from: Mikeyis4dcats on August 01, 2011, 09:21:45 PMQuote from: Sundance_Kid on August 01, 2011, 03:50:29 PMWhy was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.incorrect.This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news. QuoteEmployers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.htmlI don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity. the apparent plank failure is a seperate issue.A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.
Quote from: Mikeyis4dcats on August 01, 2011, 09:21:45 PMQuote from: Sundance_Kid on August 01, 2011, 03:50:29 PMWhy was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.incorrect.This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news. QuoteEmployers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.htmlI don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity.
Quote from: Sundance_Kid on August 01, 2011, 03:50:29 PMWhy was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.incorrect.This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.
Employers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.
Quote from: MadCat on August 01, 2011, 04:02:05 PMDid someone get this on webcam?
Did someone get this on webcam?
They good news is- life insurance pays off double if it happens while on the job. (Unless Fight Club was lying. )
A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.
Pretty sure this is some sort of spiritual trade off Bill does to maintain life and some vitality. Given how he has been looking lately, I don't know if just one will do the trick this time...
Quote from: CNS Casey on August 02, 2011, 01:38:20 PMPretty sure this is some sort of spiritual trade off Bill does to maintain life and some vitality. Given how he has been looking lately, I don't know if just one will do the trick this time...Was he first to the scene? Was the victims throat ripped out or were there paired puncture wounds?
Quote from: Mikeyis4dcats on August 01, 2011, 09:49:14 PMA worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.Not true.
So...are they working on the bathrooms again today? Are they putting it on hold indefinitely?
Quote from: OK_Cat on August 01, 2011, 08:37:38 PMQuote from: MadCat on August 01, 2011, 04:02:05 PMDid someone get this on webcam?put "OK_Cat" in the corner instead of goEMAW.com, imo.