Poll

Will the "cool" Pinstripe Bowl K-State be on the new field at BSFS?

Yes . . . it's cool.  Currie Prevails.
NO . . . OB Wins again.

Author Topic: BSFS Expansion Thread  (Read 4060728 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline sys

  • Contributor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *****
  • Posts: 40572
  • your reputation will never recover, nor should it.
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1425 on: August 01, 2011, 04:16:43 PM »
this is what happens when you don't hire populous.

props to everyone that bitched about it.
"experienced commanders will simply be smeared and will actually go to the meat."

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16709
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1426 on: August 01, 2011, 04:19:54 PM »
Probably should have just built bathrooms up there in the first place.  Send bill for funeral to Max Urick.  :frown:
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline MadCat

  • TIME's Person Of The Year - 2006
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 13781
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1427 on: August 01, 2011, 04:23:36 PM »
Dammit, if they just went with the tarps that look like limestone, we would have one more mason in the world.   :shakesfist:

Offline Rage Against the McKee

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 37188
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1428 on: August 01, 2011, 04:25:41 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

OSHA is gonna rape someone

They should. Also, the family of the guy who died will probably sue.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1429 on: August 01, 2011, 04:36:13 PM »
 :comeatme:

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile

Offline fatty fat fat

  • Katpak'r
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ***
  • Posts: 3020
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1431 on: August 01, 2011, 04:53:47 PM »
RIP.

Offline EMAWzified

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4244
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1432 on: August 01, 2011, 05:57:26 PM »
Now BSFS can be haunted like the old stadium.

Offline CyberToothCat

  • Combo-Fan
  • **
  • Posts: 673
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1433 on: August 01, 2011, 06:00:05 PM »
adds new meaning to the term "hit the bricks"  - okcat

That's a terrible thing to say.   :frown:

There's a time and a place for joking around.  A few hours after a tragic accident cost someone their life is not that time or place.  Have some respect for the poor guy that died, or at least just keep your mouth shut.

Offline DQ12

  • PCKK7DC Survivor
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • *******
  • Posts: 22301
  • #TeamChestHair
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1434 on: August 01, 2011, 06:04:23 PM »
adds new meaning to the term "hit the bricks"  - okcat

That's a terrible thing to say.   :frown:

There's a time and a place for joking around.  A few hours after a tragic accident cost someone their life is not that time or place.  Have some respect for the poor guy that died, or at least just keep your mouth shut.
uh oh...


"You want to stand next to someone and not be able to hear them, walk your ass into Manhattan, Kansas." - [REDACTED]

Offline hemmy

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 6676
  • RIP The After Party
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1435 on: August 01, 2011, 06:28:17 PM »
adds new meaning to the term "hit the bricks"  - okcat

That's a terrible thing to say.   :frown:

There's a time and a place for joking around.  A few hours after a tragic accident cost someone their life is not that time or place.  Have some respect for the poor guy that died, or at least just keep your mouth shut.

lol

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1436 on: August 01, 2011, 07:53:27 PM »
If only we had a thread to discuss the improvements being done to BSFS...

Offline Pett

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 4250
  • KLI GOD
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1437 on: August 01, 2011, 07:57:56 PM »
If only we had a thread to discuss the improvements being done to BSFS...

Didn't know the renovations included the killing of construction workers.

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1438 on: August 01, 2011, 08:01:20 PM »
The mason wasn't working on renovations at BSFS?  :confused:

Offline bigwillie20

  • Racist Piece of Shit
  • Katpak'r
  • ***
  • Posts: 2772
  • #FYJC #burnitdown
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1439 on: August 01, 2011, 08:05:44 PM »
Some noob not knowing his way around a construction site  :dunno:, sounds like a squawk to me









RIP tho

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1440 on: August 01, 2011, 08:15:05 PM »
i am apparently not as known as i think that i am.   :dubious:

Offline SkinnyBenny

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16709
  • good time rock-n-roll plastic banana FM type
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1441 on: August 01, 2011, 08:20:01 PM »
adds new meaning to the term "hit the bricks"  - okcat

That's a terrible thing to say.   :frown:

There's a time and a place for joking around.  A few hours after a tragic accident cost someone their life is not that time or place.  Have some respect for the poor guy that died, or at least just keep your mouth shut.


So I'm not the only one who has noticed an influx of ksf.com people recently, right?
"walking around mhk and crying in the rain because of love lost is the absolute purest and best thing in the world.  i hope i fall in love during the next few weeks and get my heart broken and it starts raining just to experience it one last time."   --Dlew12

Offline chum1

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 21964
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1442 on: August 01, 2011, 08:25:56 PM »
Did someone get this on webcam?

there may be renderings.  probably not good quality, though.

Offline OK_Cat

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16215
  • Hey
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1443 on: August 01, 2011, 08:37:38 PM »

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1444 on: August 01, 2011, 09:21:45 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

incorrect.


This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.   

Offline SdK

  • Libertine
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 20951
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1445 on: August 01, 2011, 09:33:36 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

incorrect.


This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.   

Quote
Employers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.

For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.

http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.html

I don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16771
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile
Re: Not good for karma....
« Reply #1446 on: August 01, 2011, 09:43:10 PM »
thoughts and prayers.

Offline Mikeyis4dcats

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 5040
  • pogonophobia: n. a fear of beards
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1447 on: August 01, 2011, 09:49:14 PM »
Why was he not wearing a harness? OSHA Violation.

incorrect.


This subcontractor is working on one of my projects, sad to hear the news.   

Quote
Employers are required to assess the workplace to determine if the walking/working surfaces on which employees are to work have the strength and structural integrity to safely support workers. Employees are not permitted to work on those surfaces until it has been determined that the surfaces have the requisite strength and structural integrity to support the workers. Once employers have determined that the surface is safe for employees to work on, the employer must select one of the options listed for the work operation if a fall hazard is present.

For example, if an employee is exposed to falling 6 feet (l .8 meters) or more from an unprotected side or edge, the employer must select either a guardrail system, safety net system, or personal fall arrest system to protect the worker. Similar requirements are prescribed for other fall hazards as follows.

http://www.osha.gov/doc/outreachtraining/htmlfiles/subpartm.html

I don't think a board that can slip out of place is adequate structural integrity.

the apparent plank failure is a seperate issue.

A worker on a properly erected scaffold with guardrails is not required to wear fall protection.

Offline 'taterblast

  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 16771
  • Hi, I'm James McGill.
    • View Profile

Offline jtksu

  • definitely not a racist piece of shit
  • Pak'r Élitaire
  • ****
  • Posts: 3673
    • View Profile
Re: BSFS Expansion Thread (Renderings on page 53)
« Reply #1449 on: August 01, 2011, 09:51:38 PM »
Guys, it's okay for a guy to not wear a harness if he has siderails.  The board being suspect is the real issue here.