Author Topic: Football Recruiting Thread (Read 6591554 times)

manpow5 · « **Reply #21825 on:** January 14, 2016, 02:13:04 PM »

Quote from: JeremyCrabtree on January 14, 2016, 11:13:14 AM

Quote from: Steffy08 on January 14, 2016, 10:57:11 AM
Quote from: Dlew12 on January 14, 2016, 10:04:05 AM
I'm not really sure how to take that.

Me either. But it seems bad. I mean, he is recruiting for Clemson, right? He can't be recruiting for KSU if he hasn't even be employed/announced yet, right?

Are these recruits that are juniors in high school? That might make a difference.

Seniors, and it's very much for Clemson and no reason to think he would be recruiting for anybody else any time soon.

Crabby is obviously in on it. They got us all watching their right hand while their doing the trick with their left.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #21826 on:** January 14, 2016, 09:00:03 PM »

Is the "Midlands" east or west of the middle east?

JeremyCrabtree · « **Reply #21827 on:** January 15, 2016, 12:45:27 PM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 14, 2016, 09:00:03 PM

Is the "Midlands" east or west of the middle east?

BV was at Olathe North today recruiting Isaiah Simmons. Might get him, too.

Also, will drop some news for ya'll... Since it looks like Josh Fatu is off the board (likely Hawaii bound), the Wildcats are making a late run at Butler DT Mychealon Thomas. He is a longtime Texas Tech commit and going to be tough to pull, but Blake Seiler is there today. Thomas told me he's likely going to visit Manhattan.

steve dave · « **Reply #21828 on:** January 15, 2016, 12:50:21 PM »

HI CRABBY

'taterblast · « **Reply #21829 on:** January 15, 2016, 12:54:44 PM »

thanks Crabby! no way he'll be able to say no to the jaw line of Blake Seiler.

Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) · « **Reply #21830 on:** January 15, 2016, 01:38:29 PM »

Ku fan boys have assured me o north guy is there's along with some de from lawrence ou is recruiting.

JeremyCrabtree · « **Reply #21831 on:** January 15, 2016, 01:57:02 PM »

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 15, 2016, 01:38:29 PM

Ku fan boys have assured me o north guy is there's along with some de from lawrence ou is recruiting.

FWIW, I think KU gets Bledsoe. Simmons has never seemed too high on KU, and Missouri, Nebraska and now Clemson would be a tough trio to beat out. For my money, Simmons is the top recruit in the state.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #21832 on:** January 15, 2016, 02:07:22 PM »

Quote from: JeremyCrabtree on January 15, 2016, 01:57:02 PM

Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 15, 2016, 01:38:29 PM
Ku fan boys have assured me o north guy is there's along with some de from lawrence ou is recruiting.

FWIW, I think KU gets Bledsoe. Simmons has never seemed too high on KU, and Missouri, Nebraska and now Clemson would be a tough trio to beat out. For my money, Simmons is the top recruit in the state.

Surely there are a few MHS guys we can ad who are way better than Simmons

Katpappy · « **Reply #21833 on:** January 15, 2016, 02:38:40 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 15, 2016, 02:07:22 PM

Quote from: JeremyCrabtree on January 15, 2016, 01:57:02 PM
Quote from: Fake Sugar Dick (WARNING, NOT THE REAL SUGAR DICK!) on January 15, 2016, 01:38:29 PM
Ku fan boys have assured me o north guy is there's along with some de from lawrence ou is recruiting.

FWIW, I think KU gets Bledsoe. Simmons has never seemed too high on KU, and Missouri, Nebraska and now Clemson would be a tough trio to beat out. For my money, Simmons is the top recruit in the state.
WD-40 got brothers?

Surely there are a few MHS guys we can ad who are way better than Simmons

'taterblast · « **Reply #21834 on:** January 15, 2016, 02:54:42 PM »

https://twitter.com/shackattack1997/status/688095856629690369

MadCat · « **Reply #21835 on:** January 15, 2016, 03:31:22 PM »

BackPayne · « **Reply #21836 on:** January 15, 2016, 03:40:26 PM »

Got damn we're good at this recruitin' stuff.

HELLHAMMER · « **Reply #21837 on:** January 15, 2016, 03:42:21 PM »

I'm sure there's a fat kid from Ellinwood to take his place.

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #21838 on:** January 15, 2016, 03:51:01 PM »

Is it interesting that BV is recruiting 2 kids out of Kansas this year. I don't think he has been involved with the state in sometime.

Dugout DickStone · « **Reply #21839 on:** January 15, 2016, 05:04:06 PM »

Did that Shack kid really flip?

Mixed-Nutz · « **Reply #21840 on:** January 15, 2016, 05:07:57 PM »

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 15, 2016, 05:04:06 PM

Did that Shack kid really flip?

Not yet, that is just announcement of him being on a UT official.

MadCat · « **Reply #21841 on:** January 15, 2016, 05:13:09 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on January 15, 2016, 03:51:01 PM

Is it interesting that BV is recruiting 2 kids out of Kansas this year. I don't think he has been involved with the state in sometime.

Hopefully he's just seeing if he can communicate with Kansas youths still.

muqluk · « **Reply #21842 on:** January 16, 2016, 02:31:53 PM »

Quote from: Mixed-Nutz on January 15, 2016, 05:07:57 PM

Quote from: Dugout DickStone on January 15, 2016, 05:04:06 PM
Did that Shack kid really flip?

Not yet, that is just announcement of him being on a UT official.

It will say more about the state of UT if he doesnt flip than KSU if he does. Would like to see him stay - and he should hopefully realize his chance of playing and excelling ate greater in Manhattan even as a TF thannif he goes to Austin bit not really expecting him to. If he goes, oh well.

BMWWcat · « **Reply #21843 on:** January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM »

At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Panjandrum · « **Reply #21844 on:** January 16, 2016, 07:23:21 PM »

Quote from: BMWWcat on January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM

At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Unless there is some sort of last minute surge, this could end up being the worst class in Snyder 2.0.

I mean it's awful. But who is actually going to commit to a coach that openly discussed retirement plans at the end of every season?

troubledscribe · « **Reply #21845 on:** January 16, 2016, 07:32:33 PM »

Quote from: Panjandrum on January 16, 2016, 07:23:21 PM

Quote from: BMWWcat on January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM
At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Unless there is some sort of last minute surge, this could end up being the worst class in Snyder 2.0.

I mean it's awful. But who is actually going to commit to a coach that openly discussed retirement plans at the end of every season?

I've been saying it all along that this class is shockingly bad.

bucket · « **Reply #21846 on:** January 16, 2016, 08:16:05 PM »

Quote from: Panjandrum on January 16, 2016, 07:23:21 PM

Quote from: BMWWcat on January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM
At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Unless there is some sort of last minute surge, this could end up being the worst class in Snyder 2.0.

I mean it's awful. But who is actually going to commit to a coach that openly discussed retirement plans at the end of every season?

Skylar and a young, solid o-line make it tolerable.

troubledscribe · « **Reply #21847 on:** January 16, 2016, 08:24:46 PM »

Quote from: bucket on January 16, 2016, 08:16:05 PM

Quote from: Panjandrum on January 16, 2016, 07:23:21 PM
Quote from: BMWWcat on January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM
At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Unless there is some sort of last minute surge, this could end up being the worst class in Snyder 2.0.

I mean it's awful. But who is actually going to commit to a coach that openly discussed retirement plans at the end of every season?

Skylar and a young, solid o-line make it tolerable.

What solid o-line?

bucket · « **Reply #21848 on:** January 16, 2016, 08:29:19 PM »

Quote from: troubledscribe on January 16, 2016, 08:24:46 PM

Quote from: bucket on January 16, 2016, 08:16:05 PM
Quote from: Panjandrum on January 16, 2016, 07:23:21 PM
Quote from: BMWWcat on January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM
At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Unless there is some sort of last minute surge, this could end up being the worst class in Snyder 2.0.

I mean it's awful. But who is actually going to commit to a coach that openly discussed retirement plans at the end of every season?

Skylar and a young, solid o-line make it tolerable.

What solid o-line?

Frantz and Applegate. Shack

meow meow · « **Reply #21849 on:** January 16, 2016, 11:39:55 PM »

Quote from: bucket on January 16, 2016, 08:29:19 PM

Quote from: troubledscribe on January 16, 2016, 08:24:46 PM
Quote from: bucket on January 16, 2016, 08:16:05 PM
Quote from: Panjandrum on January 16, 2016, 07:23:21 PM
Quote from: BMWWcat on January 16, 2016, 04:53:22 PM
At this point should we consider greyshirts as full scholarship commitments? I'm not sure how we fill this class otherwise...wow, effing terrible.

Unless there is some sort of last minute surge, this could end up being the worst class in Snyder 2.0.

I mean it's awful. But who is actually going to commit to a coach that openly discussed retirement plans at the end of every season?

Skylar and a young, solid o-line make it tolerable.

What solid o-line?

Frantz and Applegate. Shack

You know frantz and applegate are already red shirting right, dumbass?